Hi,
On 12/01/11 06:24, John Calcote wrote:
On 01/11/2011 04:31 AM, Russell Shaw wrote:
Hi,
On debian, there is /usr/bin/bison, and
/usr/bin/bison.yacc just does:
exec '/usr/bin/bison' -y $@
How can i get autoconf to use bison?
The problem with yacc is that you can't rename
the output
Russell Shaw wrote:
How can i get autoconf to use bison?
The problem with yacc is that you can't rename
the output files and always get: y.tab.h y.tab.c
Is there a way i can get yacc to give better output
file names like myproj.tab.h myproj.tab.c ?
Is this really an autoconf question? Seems
On 01/11/2011 04:31 AM, Russell Shaw wrote:
Hi,
On debian, there is /usr/bin/bison, and
/usr/bin/bison.yacc just does:
exec '/usr/bin/bison' -y $@
How can i get autoconf to use bison?
The problem with yacc is that you can't rename
the output files and always get: y.tab.h y.tab.c
Is
On 12/01/11 06:24, John Calcote wrote:
On 01/11/2011 04:31 AM, Russell Shaw wrote:
Hi,
On debian, there is /usr/bin/bison, and
/usr/bin/bison.yacc just does:
exec '/usr/bin/bison' -y $@
How can i get autoconf to use bison?
The problem with yacc is that you can't rename
the output files
Hello Tys,
* tys lefering wrote on Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 07:43:53PM CET:
GNU bison is using autotest with 'make maintainer-check'
and that works fine. at failed test lines appear like:
./regression.at:941: $CXX $CXXFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS -o dancer dancer.cc
$LIBS
is it possible to have the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey
This works for me. But i have a problem it works only if i use 1
yacc/lex. But when i move to add in multiple lexer's etc not too sure
how to make this work..
I see stuff on the gdb hack to redefine all the variables but not too
sure how this is
Hello Philip,
please don't top-post, thank you. Also, what do you think about moving
to the automake list, where this topic fits better? Followup set.
* Philip Herron wrote on Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 03:20:00PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Philip Herron wrote on Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at
Hello Philip,
* Philip Herron wrote on Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:51:50PM CEST:
I am not sure if this is autoconf or automake.
If you use Automake, then this is an Automake question. :-)
I see there is AC_PROG_YACC and AC_PROG_LEX to get the apropriate
programs for the configure.ac. But how do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Philip,
* Philip Herron wrote on Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:51:50PM CEST:
I am not sure if this is autoconf or automake.
If you use Automake, then this is an Automake question. :-)
I see there is AC_PROG_YACC and
On 10/24/06, Paulo J. Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some unknown reason when I use AC_PROG_YACC, I get when I run configure:
checking for bison... byacc -d
The reason is not unknown anymore and it was my fault which copied a
bunch of bash configuration to my .bashrc and one of the lines
Akim == Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK. I've suggested splitting the autotest test suite before.
Let's look at that idea again sometime later (one file per test, and
source them for execution from the main test suite script), it's bound
to give both execution time
OK. I've suggested splitting the autotest test suite before.
Let's look at that idea again sometime later (one file per test, and
source them for execution from the main test suite script), it's bound
to give both execution time improvements and portability improvements.
Using functions should
* H.Merijn Brand wrote on Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:28:16PM CEST:
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 20:38:38 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Paul Eggert wrote on Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:27:17PM CEST:
H.Merijn Brand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's a long-known fact that the AIX /bin/sh
Hi,
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 07:51:01PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
Does 'make dist' automatically include them in the distro though?
supposing you are using Automake, yes.
Stepan
___
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@gnu.org
Does 'make dist' automatically include them in the distro though?
supposing you are using Automake, yes.
And if you don't use Automake, the answer is `maybe'. groff doesn't
use Automake, but it's `make dist' *does* ensure that all bison and
texinfo generated files go into the tarball; (none
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 02:13:26PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know if bison generated files typically get checked into the
source repository, and build system the same way flex generated files
are? That way, other developers or users do not need bison installed if
they do not
Bob Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone know if bison generated files typically get checked into the
source repository, and build system the same way flex generated files
are? That way, other developers or users do not need bison installed if
they do not change the bison grammar
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:48:56PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
Bob Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone know if bison generated files typically get checked into the
source repository, and build system the same way flex generated files
are? That way, other developers or users do not
Hi Bob,
* Bob Rossi wrote on Wed, May 24, 2006 at 01:51:01AM CEST:
Does 'make dist' automatically include them in the distro though?
Yes. info Automake Yacc and Lex
Cheers,
Ralf
___
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@gnu.org
Gary == Gary V Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gary As far as shell functions are concerned, it seems to me that
Gary m4sh could provide shell function wrapper macros which expand to
Gary a function/function call if that is supported by the shell, or
Gary else an inline function if not...
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 06:00:38PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
Gary == Gary V Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gary As far as shell functions are concerned, it seems to me that
Gary m4sh could provide shell function wrapper macros which expand to
Gary a function/function call if that is
Paul == Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 04 Oct 2001 17:31:18
+0200
First let's find a portable LINENO, *then* move to another shell.
Paul But the attempt to find a portable LINENO is not cost-free.
Paul It is broken now, and it will take
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 10:56:04AM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
People, the question is:
If we look for a reasonable shell and re-exec configure once
we found one, are you OK with keeping $LINENO used in
configure, even if the shell does not treat $LINENO
Hi, Akim!
People, the question is:
If we look for a reasonable shell and re-exec configure once
we found one, are you OK with keeping $LINENO used in
configure, even if the shell does not treat $LINENO specially?
*And*, keep in mind the decision involves M4sh too
From: Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 05 Oct 2001 10:56:04 +0200
So am I understanding that LINENO is a POSIX feature?
Yes.
The current implementation in CVS Autoconf might be broken, but
really, I fail to understand what makes you fear the LINENO stuff that
much. Why do you say
25 matches
Mail list logo
