Ian Kent wrote:
That sounds a bit like bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632471
I don't have permission to view that bug ...
It was fixed in development revision 152, which I happen to have on
people.redhat.com. You could give that a try.
From: Ian Kent ra...@themaw.net
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 20:20 +0100, Colin Simpson wrote:
Hi
I was just wondering what the thoughts (maybe plans) are for making
autofs/nfs more dynamic in the new world of dynamic networking with
the likes of Network Manager now being the default.
I've
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 05:34 +0100, Ian Kent wrote:
The problem with that is just gone can't be defined.
The remove server could be rebooting and be available soon.
That's true, but I wonder if it is largely machine type dependant. On a
server or a workstation it may pay to wait for ever. If on
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 15:13 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
On 2011-04-27 09:22 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
On 2011-04-21 17:25 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 03:44:03PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
Just saw this on 2.6.39-rc2 after half a day or so of uptime. I've
never
Hi Steven, and sorry for the delay.
On 2011-06-13 20:43 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
I'm going to wrap this up and send it out as a proper patch. Can I add
your Reported-by and Tested-by tags?
Sure, but please only add Tested-by if the code changes are the same as
the patch I actually tested.
