[Autogen-users] 5.16.1 make check failure

2012-06-18 Thread Harlan Stenn
On pogo, after fixing the zNotStr instance: ... PASS: loop.test PATH is

Re: [Autogen-users] 5.16.1 make check failure

2012-06-18 Thread Bruce Korb
On 06/17/12 23:26, Harlan Stenn wrote: On pogo, after fixing the zNotStr instance: ... PASS: loop.test PATH is

Re: [Autogen-users] 5.16.1 make check failure

2012-06-18 Thread Dave Hart
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Bruce Korb bruce.k...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/17/12 23:26, Harlan Stenn wrote: On pogo, after fixing the zNotStr instance: ... PASS: loop.test PATH is

Re: [Autogen-users] 5.16.1 make check failure

2012-06-18 Thread Bruce Korb
On 06/18/12 10:57, Dave Hart wrote: On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Bruce Korbbruce.k...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/17/12 23:26, Harlan Stenn wrote: On pogo, after fixing the zNotStr instance: I have not seen Harlan's message about zNotStr, so I don't know what the issue is. That does not

Re: [Autogen-users] 5.16.1 make check failure

2012-06-18 Thread Dave Hart
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Bruce Korb bruce.k...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/18/12 10:57, Dave Hart wrote: On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Bruce Korbbruce.k...@gmail.com  wrote: On 06/17/12 23:26, Harlan Stenn wrote: On pogo, after fixing the zNotStr instance: I have not seen Harlan's

Re: [Autogen-users] 5.16.1 make check failure

2012-06-18 Thread Bruce Korb
Hi Dave, You missed the point. I do not want two functions: char const * fnc(char const * in) as well as char * fnnc(char * in) any more than libc wants two flavors of strstr(), for example. So strstr() returns char * and it is up to the caller to be careful. Perhaps the right thing is to

Re: [Autogen-users] 5.16.1 make check failure

2012-06-18 Thread Bruce Korb
On 06/18/12 11:22, Bruce Korb wrote: I have not seen Harlan's message about zNotStr, so I don't know what the issue is. I've found the problem: It exists in an atrophied section of code for Guile 1.6 only code. I've fixed it in my source now. Since I don't have access to any platform with 6

Re: [Autogen-users] 5.16.1 make check failure

2012-06-18 Thread Harlan Stenn
Bruce wrote: I've found the problem: It exists in an atrophied section of code for Guile 1.6 only code. I've fixed it in my source now. Since I don't have access to any platform with 6 year old Guile, I have to depend on others to alert me during the pre release phase. Guile 1.8 was