Re: gettext-0.14.2 fails on parallel build

2005-03-16 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hi, On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:08:06PM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote: mv -f elc-temp $@ .. mv -f elc-temp $@ || { touch $@; rm -f elc-temp; } But this change is incorrect. It canmcels the whole trick: touch tmp ... mv tmp $@ ensures that the stamp file will be older

Re: gettext-0.14.2 fails on parallel build

2005-03-16 Thread Bruno Haible
Stepan Kasal wrote: mv -f elc-temp $@ .. mv -f elc-temp $@ || { touch $@; rm -f elc-temp; } But this change is incorrect. It canmcels the whole trick: touch tmp ... mv tmp $@ ensures that the stamp file will be older than the files created by OK, then

Re: gettext-0.14.2 fails on parallel build

2005-03-16 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:08:06PM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote: Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: Thanks, I'm installing the following fix on HEAD and branch-1-9. ... -## Recover from the removal of $@ - @if test ! -f $@; then \ +## Recover from the removal of [EMAIL PROTECTED] +## +##

Re: gettext-0.14.2 fails on parallel build

2005-03-16 Thread Bruno Haible
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: Thanks, I'm installing the following fix on HEAD and branch-1-9. ... -## Recover from the removal of $@ - @if test ! -f $@; then \ +## Recover from the removal of [EMAIL PROTECTED] +## +## Make sure not to call `make elc-stamp' if emacs is not available, +##

Re: Including local macros with ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS

2005-03-16 Thread Rohnny Moland
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 08:12, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Oh, or are you invoking aclocal directly? Then you should do aclocal -I m4 ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS are only respected by the rebuilding rules put in Makefile.in and by autoreconf. Thanks for your help, Ralf. I was invoking aclocal

help with these errors

2005-03-16 Thread Hong Liu
Hi, I see the following errors during buildconf or configure and don't know what is causing them. Please advise what they mean and how to troubleshoot them. thanks, Hong Liu checking for ANSI C header files... no .. checking size of char... 0 checking size of int... 0 checking size of

make uninstall could do rmdir

2005-03-16 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, recently, I run make uninstall with a package I previously installed by make install. The package heavily uses the feature foodir = ... foo_HEADERS = ... and thus created many directories. After the uninstall, the directories are empty. I imagined that make uninstall

Re: make uninstall could do rmdir

2005-03-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Stepan, * Stepan Kasal wrote on Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:40:01PM CET: recently, I run make uninstall with a package I previously installed by make install. The package heavily uses the feature foodir = ... foo_HEADERS = ... and thus created many directories. After the

Re: builddir vs. srcdir

2005-03-16 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 06:56:20PM +0200, Paul Pogonyshev wrote: Everything seems to work just fine and as expected, your code, which is in whole cited below, doesn't actually know about the dependency foo.c foo.h: foo.list So if you change the .list file, the other files won't be

Re: I: adjust test suite for upcoming GNU Make 3.83

2005-03-16 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
pds == Paul D Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] pds I'm interested in discussing the issue and possible solutions. The one pds I added to the bug report involves using :=, since simply-expanded pds variables in GNU make are always only expanded one time, no matter how pds many times