Hello Peter,
* Peter Breitenlohner wrote on Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 03:35:48PM CEST:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Peter Breitenlohner wrote:
are there any plans that Automake supports ObjC++ (as implemented in
gcc-4.x)?
AFAIK nobody else is working on patches yet; they would be very welcome.
I suppose
Hello Rhys,
* Rhys Ulerich wrote on Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 01:10:04AM CEST:
I noticed that the default 'make tags' target creates a toplevel TAGS
file that includes all the TAGS files in subdirectories. This is
goodness. At least on automake 1.10.1 it seems that a similar,
toplevel tags file
Hello Braden,
* Braden McDaniel wrote on Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 06:21:14AM CEST:
When using -Wall, I get this warning from automake:
tests/Makefile.am:79: user variable `CLASSPATH_ENV' defined here...
/usr/share/automake-1.11/am/java.am: ... overrides Automake variable
Could the ctags -a argument (or some other mechanism) be used to
simulate the inclusion mechanism?
AFAIK there is no such mechanism in ctags files, nor in vi or its clones
who read tags files.
It may be possible to use ctags' -a/--append option here. Maybe having
'make ctags' run in
I'm trying to get a binary to compile only if a certain --enable-xxx is
specified to ./configure. There may be a filename collision that's causing
problems. Maybe someone here can check my math.
Near the top of Makefile.am, I start with:
sbin_PROGRAMS = openfoo openfoo-util1 openfoo-util2
Hello Murray,
* Murray S. Kucherawy wrote on Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 05:44:48PM CEST:
sbin_PROGRAMS = openfoo openfoo-util1 openfoo-util2
One of the source files for openfoo is a file called stats.c.
if STATS
sbin_PROGRAMS += openfoo-stats
openfoo_stats_SOURCES = openfoo-db.c openfoo-stats.c
