On Friday 11 February 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:10:15AM CET:
Subject: [PATCH] python: extend and improve tests, fix minor glitches
[...]
* tests/python-vars.test: New test, checking that AM_PATH_PYTHON
correctly set
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:49:28AM CET:
OK to apply? I will push in 72 hours if there are no further
objections.
The patch is OK as it is a strict improvement IIUC, but I still have a
question below.
Thanks,
Ralf
Subject: [PATCH] python: fix spurious failure in
On Sunday 13 February 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:49:28AM CET:
OK to apply? I will push in 72 hours if there are no further
objections.
The patch is OK as it is a strict improvement IIUC, but I still have a
question below.
Thanks,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 02:09:03PM CET:
On Sunday 13 February 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:49:28AM CET:
+ cat pythondir
+ case `cat pythondir` in '$${prefix}'/*);; *) exit 1;; esac
+ cat pyexecdir
+ case
Hello Peter,
* Peter Johansson wrote on Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 05:18:10PM CET:
The `INSTALL' file provided by autotools has the following blurp
On MacOS X 10.5 and later systems, you can create libraries and
executables that work on multiple system types--known as fat or
universal
You mean, as a workaround until Automake is improved? You could
overwrite the rule in your Makefile.am:
mostlyclean-compile:
-find . -name \*.lo -o -name \*.$(OBJEXT) -print | xargs rm -f
But note that automake may generate other files that would need to be
mostlyclean'ed too, so the
* Ralf Hemmecke wrote on Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 03:10:39PM CET:
You mean, as a workaround until Automake is improved? You could
overwrite the rule in your Makefile.am:
mostlyclean-compile:
-find . -name \*.lo -o -name \*.$(OBJEXT) -print | xargs rm -f
But note that automake may
We have a bug tracker. Just write to the bug-automake list.
This is documented at
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Reporting-Bugs.html
Oh yes, but it's not completely clear to me whether I get only an email
for a bug that I submitted or whether I can explicitly can
* Ralf Hemmecke wrote on Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 06:46:12PM CET:
We have a bug tracker. Just write to the bug-automake list.
This is documented at
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Reporting-Bugs.html
Oh yes, but it's not completely clear to me whether I get only an
email
[ Cross post; Reply-To and Mail-Followup-To set. Please followup to
the automake list only, to avoid excessive spammage. Thank you. ]
Hello everyone,
I've been advertising debbugs before, I think we should be a good
example. So, two proposals:
1) Autoconf and Libtool should also use
Thanks Ralf for your quick reply,
On 2/13/11 2:44 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I would prepend all lines of a rule with a TAB, not just those not
following a backslash-escaped newline. I'm actually not totally sure
whether that was for portability to non-Posix make or so automake would
parse
Ralf Wildenhues wrote (on Sun, 13 Feb 2011 at 19:01 +0100):
I glanced over the debbugs documentation at debbugs.gnu.org now, but
couldn't find a place that said something about subscribing to
individual bugs. Glen, do you happen to know more about this?
I know that it doesn't work, and
ping 3 :)
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.comwrote:
ping2 :)
Vincent Torri
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
Hey,
Wasn't what i want (see below) clear enough ?
Vincent Torri
First, it seems that i have
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Daily, Jeff A jeff.da...@pnl.gov wrote:
From: automake-bounces+jeff.daily=pnl@gnu.org
[automake-bounces+jeff.daily=pnl@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Ralf Hemmecke
[hemme...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 11:18 AM
To: automake@gnu.org
Subject:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
I think I would get too many (to me irrelevant) mails if I subscribe to the
bug-automake mailing list.
That is true, but you don't need to subcribe to the list in order to
post to it and it is normal to be Cc:ed on any response. A list
moderator
This is a copy of
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2011-02/msg00017.html
It's not really a bug, but rather a feature request.
Ralf
Original Message
Subject: slow make clean
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 23:46:55 +0100
From: Ralf Hemmecke hemme...@gmail.com
To:
Hi Ralf,
On 2/13/11 3:32 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Yep. I think that was one reason we explicitly documented the thing in
INSTALL. With this configuration, your preprocessor will be wrong
(because CFLAGS are not passed to it) which means macro values may be
computed wrongly.
I'm not sure I
17 matches
Mail list logo
