On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Ralf Wildenhues
ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote:
Another possible change, in addition to messing with the documentation,
would be to make the dvi a variable that such non-dvi-generating
people can override with pdf if they wish. Then they could get the
benefit
However, there are cases where dvi output just
isn't feasible in practice.
Yep. Therein lies the essence of the problem.
not bother checking dvi output and rather test PDF output seems
like another good alternative.
I can't agree with that. That's trading DVI-generation
Hi Jack,
New automake options? Something like:
I like my idea of a variable better :).
Seems simpler/less intrusive/more general.
Best,
k
* Karl Berry wrote on Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:28:59PM CET:
not bother checking dvi output and rather test PDF output seems
like another good alternative.
I can't agree with that. That's trading DVI-generation problems for
PDF-generation problems. Believe me, there will be just as
Hi Robert,
thanks for the feedback. I have a couple of questions:
* Robert Collins wrote on Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 05:10:16AM CET:
TAP is an extremely simple protocol, and the extensions to it to
support things like not needing to maintain the count of tests,
additional debug data and so on
Hello Pippijn,
* Pippijn van Steenhoven wrote on Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:47:35AM CET:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:38:39AM +0100, Pippijn van Steenhoven wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 05:26:58PM -0700, Harlan Stenn wrote:
If there was a student interested in showing how easy it was to use
Hello Robert, and thanks for the feedback.
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Stefano Lattarini
stefano.lattar...@gmail.com wrote:
ABSTRACT:
The Test Anything Protocol (TAP) is a simple text-based protocol
that allows communication between
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Robert,
thanks for the feedback. I have a couple of questions:
* Robert Collins wrote on Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 05:10:16AM CET:
TAP is an extremely simple protocol, and the extensions to it to
support things
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Stefano Lattarini
stefano.lattar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Robert, and thanks for the feedback.
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Stefano Lattarini
stefano.lattar...@gmail.com wrote:
ABSTRACT:
The Test
* Robert Collins wrote on Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:03:10AM CET:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Robert Collins wrote on Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 05:10:16AM CET:
TAP is an extremely simple protocol, and the extensions to it to
support things like not needing to maintain
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:40:39AM CET:
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Are TAP and subunit compatible on their common subset? If not, why not?
You can convert TAP to subunit, and you can
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Stefano Lattarini
stefano.lattar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Robert, and thanks for the feedback.
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Stefano Lattarini
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:40:39AM CET:
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Are TAP and subunit compatible on their common subset? If not, why
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Or add a subunit parser and a quick tap2subunit perl module today
and have the best of both worlds? (This is meant as an honest question,
even if it looks like a rhetoric one.)
I think that's a good approach. I don't really use either framework,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 01:41:07PM CET:
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Or add a subunit parser and a quick tap2subunit perl module today
[perl module? what about portability?]
awk should be sufficient, for text-mode output at least.
and have the
On 03/19/2011 01:45 PM, Harlan Stenn wrote:
Pippijn wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 05:26:58PM -0700, Harlan Stenn wrote:
If there was a student interested in showing how easy it was to use
automake to do non-recursive Makefiles for a project, I'd be willing to
co-mentor and work with them to
Hi Ralf,
I've got a convenience library where the LDFLAGS includes -R:
noinst_LTLIBRARIES = libsomething.la
...
libsomething_la_LDFLAGS = -Rsomewhere
and I indeed see -Rsomewhere appear within libsomething.la's
dependency_libs
line the way I expect.
In another directory, I
17 matches
Mail list logo
