15.3.3.1 Command-line arguments for test drivers
--test-name=NAME
The name of the test, with VPATH prefix (if any) removed. This can
have a suffix and a directory component (as in e.g., sub/foo.test), and is
mostly meant to be used in console reports about testsuite advancements and
On 26 April 2015 at 16:30, Arthur Schwarz aschwarz1...@att.net wrote:
15.3.3.1 Command-line arguments for test drivers
--test-name=NAME
The name of the test, with VPATH prefix (if any) removed. This can
have a suffix and a directory component (as in e.g., sub/foo.test), and is
On 26 April 2015 at 01:25, Arthur Schwarz aschwarz1...@att.net wrote:
Well, putting it gently you have a good product and one of (maybe, the)
worst manual on earth describing it.
I'd like to see improvements as well, but calling other people's work
the worst manual on earth is not conducive to
(thanks by the way)
On 26 April 2015 at 18:39, Arthur Schwarz aschwarz1...@att.net wrote:
Now for the case you mentioned in identifying a program, which is
really a test case renamed in the manual for mystifying and unknowable
reasons. Well, there is no mechanism for The first
-Original Message-
From: Gavin Smith [mailto:gavinsmith0...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2015 1:42 PM
To: Arthur Schwarz
Cc: Automake Mailing List
Subject: Re: Question on --test-name=NAME
As a point, 15.3.3.1 Command-line arguments for test drivers shows all
options
-Original Message-
From: Gavin Smith [mailto:gavinsmith0...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2015 9:03 AM
To: Arthur Schwarz
Cc: Automake Mailing List
Subject: Re: Question on --test-name=NAME
On 26 April 2015 at 16:30, Arthur Schwarz aschwarz1...@att.net wrote:
As a point, 15.3.3.1 Command-line arguments for test drivers shows all
options as having the syntax --option=value. Your example does not have
this syntax. Will your example work? Should this be in the manual, as in
--option[=| ]value?
I am sure that both should be supported although I
On 26 April 2015 at 18:39, Arthur Schwarz aschwarz1...@att.net wrote:
Now for the case you mentioned in identifying a program, which is really a
test case renamed in the manual for mystifying and unknowable reasons. Well,
there is no mechanism for The first non-option argument passed to the
