Hi Bob,
On 9/18/19 3:22 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2019, Jerry Lundström wrote:
>>
>> With v1.16 this step is executed during `make dist` and using
>> `EXTRA_DIST` for that whole directory would also mean that _the built
>> library_ would be included in the dist.
>
>
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019, Jerry Lundström wrote:
With v1.16 this step is executed during `make dist` and using
`EXTRA_DIST` for that whole directory would also mean that _the built
library_ would be included in the dist.
`EXTRA_DIST` only goes so far. In my own project I use `dist-hook` to
Hi Nick,
On 9/17/19 8:25 PM, Nick Bowler wrote:
> ... I just ran this example with Automake 1.16.1 and neither ext/built.c
> nor ext/built.o are included in the distribution tar file generated by
> 'make dist'.
Exactly! Then why are they built during `make dist`?
$ make dist
make
Hi Jerry,
On 9/17/19, Jerry Lundström wrote:
> This problem seems to have been introduced in v1.16 with:
>
> - "./configure && make dist" no longer fails when a distributed file
> depends on one from BUILT_SOURCES.
>
> And what I can see in the Makefile output is that $(BUILT_SOURCES) has
> been
On Tue, 17 Sep 2019, Jerry Lundström wrote:
I can't really see how this change got approved, isn't the point of
BUILT_SOURCES to be sources built when building!? Including them into
distributions seems wrong.
I see considerable documentation regarding BUILT_SOURCES at
Hi,
This problem seems to have been introduced in v1.16 with:
- "./configure && make dist" no longer fails when a distributed file
depends on one from BUILT_SOURCES.
And what I can see in the Makefile output is that $(BUILT_SOURCES) has
been added to distdir.
I can't really see how this change
