On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Bob Rossi b...@brasko.net wrote:
Autotools is a great build system. However, after configuring it to
place as many files as possible in a subdirectory, it still takes up
87.5% of my projects root directory.
aclocal.m4
autom4te.cache
build
On 29/04/2013 20:16, Bob Rossi wrote:
Autotools is a great build system. However, after configuring it to
place as many files as possible in a subdirectory, it still takes up
87.5% of my projects root directory.
And?
Do you really think that just for the sake of ls output you should mess
up
The original question was a question, not a cry.
It is legitimate desire to have clean ways of organizing build system files
and source files.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
flamee...@flameeyes.euwrote:
On 29/04/2013 20:16, Bob Rossi wrote:
Autotools is a great build
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 06:52:32PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 04/24/2013 06:44 PM, Andy Tai wrote:
The GNU Build system is generally set up such that the Makefile.am,
configure.ac, etc. files are in the root directory of a software project.
Is there a way to place these files in a
Bob Rossi writes:
Autotools is a great build system. However, after configuring it to
place as many files as possible in a subdirectory, it still takes up
87.5% of my projects root directory.
aclocal.m4
autom4te.cache
build
configure
configure.ac
Makefile.am
The GNU Build system is generally set up such that the Makefile.am,
configure.ac, etc. files are in the root directory of a software project.
Is there a way to place these files in a subdirectory of the root
directory, like this as an example:
./
README
COPYING
GNUBuild/
On 04/24/2013 06:44 PM, Andy Tai wrote:
The GNU Build system is generally set up such that the Makefile.am,
configure.ac, etc. files are in the root directory of a software project.
Is there a way to place these files in a subdirectory of the root
directory, like this as an example:
./
