Re: release schedule for 1.9? (Was: Re: automake -vs- huge projects (1st patch))

2004-01-22 Thread Tom Tromey
adl == Alexandre Duret-Lutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: adl Also, since we have switched to API-numbering, bumping that adl version number has a cost. For instance Debian distributes adl automake1.4, automake1.6, automake1.7, and automake1.8. If we adl add another API, it'd better be worth it.

release schedule for 1.9? (Was: Re: automake -vs- huge projects (1st patch))

2004-01-20 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Thomas == Thomas Fitzsimmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Thomas I was wondering about the time frame for the next Thomas release of automake. Our libgcj configury upgrade Thomas depends on changes that are currently only available in Thomas automake's CVS HEAD, so we anxiously await an

Re: automake -vs- huge projects (1st patch)

2004-01-15 Thread Thomas Fitzsimmons
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 16:39, Tom Tromey wrote: Tom == Thomas Fitzsimmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [ suggestions ] Tom Anyway, this patch brings us closer to using automake-1.8 for libgcj. Tom Thanks! I think all the patches are in now. Could you try CVS automake and see how big the

Re: automake -vs- huge projects (1st patch)

2004-01-02 Thread Tom Tromey
Tom == Thomas Fitzsimmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [ suggestions ] Tom Anyway, this patch brings us closer to using automake-1.8 for libgcj. Tom Thanks! I think all the patches are in now. Could you try CVS automake and see how big the resulting Makefile.in is? Tom

Re: automake -vs- huge projects (1st patch)

2003-12-30 Thread Thomas Fitzsimmons
On Sat, 2003-12-27 at 21:25, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: adl == Alexandre Duret-Lutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] adl 1999-11-22 Tom Tromey [EMAIL PROTECTED] adl adl * automake.in (handle_single_transform_list): Generate explicit adl rule for subdir objects.

Re: automake -vs- huge projects (1st patch)

2003-12-30 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Thomas == Thomas Fitzsimmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Thomas The size could still be reduced further though. I Thomas discussed the following with Tom on IRC: Thomas - all libgcj objects are listed in Thomas am__libgcj_la_SOURCES_DIST which is included in Thomas DIST_SOURCES.