Re: Building prog first

2010-03-22 Thread Steffen Dettmer
* On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: noinst_PROGRAMS = unimain unimain_SOURCES = unimain.c unidata.tab.c: unimain$(EXEEXT) /usr/share/unicode/UnicodeData.txt ./unimain$(EXEEXT) $ $@ BTW, execution of built programs like this makes your package unsuitable

Re: Building prog first

2010-03-22 Thread Russell Shaw
Steffen Dettmer wrote: * On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: noinst_PROGRAMS = unimain unimain_SOURCES = unimain.c unidata.tab.c: unimain$(EXEEXT) /usr/share/unicode/UnicodeData.txt ./unimain$(EXEEXT) $ $@ BTW, execution of built programs like this makes your

Re: Building prog first

2010-03-22 Thread Reuben Thomas
2010/3/22 Russell Shaw rjs...@netspace.net.au: Steffen Dettmer wrote: * On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: BTW, execution of built programs like this makes your package unsuitable for cross-compilation.  Just so you're aware of that. Not true. automake does not have

Re: Building prog first

2010-03-22 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
If searching is the problem how does the indices not fix the problem? What about using a info browser to search through the manual?

Re: Building prog first

2010-03-22 Thread John Calcote
On 3/22/2010 4:34 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote: What about using a info browser to search through the manual? I often do that. The trouble is that often what I want to know has to be deduced from the manual, which is natural enough, because the manual tends to be structured according to the

Automake Installation Error

2010-03-22 Thread William Drozd
I have configured/make/make install on autoconf with no problems. I have run automake's configure with no problems. However, when I run make while trying to install automake I get the error: -bash-3.1$ make CDPATH=${ZSH_VERSION+.}: cd . perllibdir=/home/wdrozd/cmake/automake-1.11.1/lib:./lib

Re: Building prog first

2010-03-22 Thread Robert J. Hansen
On 3/22/10 6:50 PM, John Calcote wrote: Reuben, you've just hit upon one of the two most significant problems with Javadoc and the like (including doxygen, man pages, and info pages): Agreed -- which is why I think it would be wonderful if there was strong Autotools support for literate