Hello Reuben,
* Reuben Thomas wrote on Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 04:44:17PM CET:
2010/3/22 Russell Shaw:
Steffen Dettmer wrote:
* On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
BTW, execution of built programs like this makes your package unsuitable
for cross-compilation. Just so
Hello William,
* William Drozd wrote on Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 03:48:58PM CET:
I have configured/make/make install on autoconf with no problems.
I have run automake's configure with no problems.
However, when I run make while trying to install automake I get the error:
-bash-3.1$ make
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Reuben Thomas r...@sc3d.org wrote:
Not true. automake does not have explicit support for building
programs with the host compiler when cross-compiling, but I
have done this successfully in the past when I needed precisely
to build a program on the host when
Steffen Dettmer wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Reuben Thomas r...@sc3d.org wrote:
Not true. automake does not have explicit support for building
programs with the host compiler when cross-compiling, but I
have done this successfully in the past when I needed precisely
to build a
(OT)
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:50 PM, John Calcote john.calc...@gmail.com wrote:
Reuben, you've just hit upon one of the two most significant
problems with Javadoc and the like (including doxygen, man
pages, and info pages):
sorry, I cannot leave this, because this would be an excuse for
On 23 March 2010 06:03, Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello Reuben,
* Reuben Thomas wrote on Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 04:44:17PM CET:
2010/3/22 Russell Shaw:
Steffen Dettmer wrote:
* On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
BTW, execution of built programs
On 23 March 2010 10:15, Steffen Dettmer steffen.dett...@googlemail.com wrote:
This illustrates a weirdness of autotools: poor support for
installing interpreted languages, and also conversely for
build-time compiled programs.
Yes, also for coffee-cooking there is poor support only. :-)
Sure,
2010/3/22 Alfred M. Szmidt a...@gnu.org:
If searching is the problem
*Web* searching is the answer, not the problem.
It isn't when you are not connected to a network.
how does the indices not fix the problem?
I rarely find anything useful in the indices other than particular
On 23 March 2010 17:15, Alfred M. Szmidt a...@gnu.org wrote:
2010/3/22 Alfred M. Szmidt a...@gnu.org:
If searching is the problem
*Web* searching is the answer, not the problem.
It isn't when you are not connected to a network.
I usually wait until I am; it often takes me rather
You say that the manuals are poor and that it is obvious, but I cannot
figure out from your explanation how they are poor. I've looked at a
few manuals, glibc, emacs, coreutils, autoconf, and m4, and all of
them have good indices, are organised cleanly, etc.
Can you mention one or two manuals,
On 23 March 2010 18:12, Alfred M. Szmidt a...@gnu.org wrote:
You say that the manuals are poor
I said that the indices are poor, specifically at indexing concepts
rather than just keywords, function names c., in general. I also said
that the manuals in general are excellent.
and that it is
Hi all,
I have been using automake for a while now, however I recently came
across an issue i haven't had to worry about before, which is having
duplicate named source files under different directory structures
producing conflicting object files.
Say i have a source directory structure like:
12 matches
Mail list logo
