bug#7995: Guile support in Automake

[ http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7995 aka http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.automake.bugs/5303 ] * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 11:22:57PM CET: Automake should support Guile. I actually have patches for some tests, documentation and half an

bug#7995: [PATCH 1/4] Documentation for Guile support.

* doc/automake.texi (Guile): New chapter. (Top, Other GNU Tools): Update menus. * NEWS: Update. Initial suggestion and lots of ideas and from Andy Wingo and Ludovic Courtè. --- ChangeLog |9 +++ NEWS |5 ++ doc/automake.texi | 154

bug#7995: [PATCH 2/4] Testsuite coverage for Guile support.

* tests/guile1.test, tests/guile2.test, tests/guile3.test, tests/guile4.test: New tests. * tests/Makefile.am (TESTS, XFAIL_TESTS): Update. --- ChangeLog |5 ++ tests/Makefile.am |8 +++ tests/Makefile.in |7 ++- tests/guile1.test | 54 ++

bug#7995: [PATCH 4/4] Implement Guile support.

* automake.in: Register new language 'Guile'. (handle_guile): New function. (generate_makefile): Call it. (am_install_var): Treat 'GUILE' primary like JAVA and PYTHON. * lib/am/guile.am: New file. * lib/am/Makefile.am (dist_am_DATA): Add guile.am. --- ChangeLog |8

bug#7995: [PATCH 3/4] Guile macro AM_PATH_GUILE.

* m4/guile.m4 (AM_PATH_GUILE): New file, new macro. * m4/Makefile.am (dist_m4data_DATA): Add guile.m4. --- ChangeLog |4 +++ m4/Makefile.am |3 +- m4/Makefile.in |3 +- m4/guile.m4| 63 4 files changed, 71

Re: [PATCH] {maint} tests: tempdirs with restrictive permissions are cleaned correctly

Hi Stefano, sorry for the silence, I've been traveling. My plan is to do slowly but steady catchup over the next week(end)s ... * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:26:17PM CET: * tests/defs: Ensure that all the subdirectories of a temporary test directory have the 'read',

Re: debbugs, and a FAQ, for Autotools

Hello everyone, * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 07:12:02PM CET: 2) Autotools should have a FAQ document. I've done a brain dump now, here's a rough initial version: http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/faq/autotools-faq.html and

Re: debbugs, and a FAQ, for Autotools

Hi Russell, * Russell Shaw wrote on Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:00:14AM CET: I'd ask more about how the internals of ./configure and autoconf works. Can you formulate more specific questions? And questions on how to make bison get handled without being forced to mimic standard yacc. I've added

Re: debbugs, and a FAQ, for Autotools

On 20/02/11 06:10, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Russell, * Russell Shaw wrote on Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:00:14AM CET: I'd ask more about how the internals of ./configure and autoconf works. Can you formulate more specific questions? And questions on how to make bison get handled without being

Re: about what goes into a distribution file

Hi Vincent, * Vincent Torri wrote on Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 08:33:01AM CET: from the automake documentation, all the files read by AC_CONFIG_FILES are added in the distribution. But why aren't the generated files not in the tarball (the .pc.in are in but not the .pc for example) ? Just to

Re: dynamic executables for check_PROGRAMS?

Hello Jeff, * Daily, Jeff A wrote on Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:06:13AM CET: I wrote a profiling layer for my library utilizing weak symbols. I thought for starters it would be nice to profile some of my test programs, to make sure things are working okay. I'm using autoconf, automake, and