I have just been investigating the state of the art for LaTeX support.
As far as I can tell there's nothing official; the most official
things I can find are some unwritten documentation in the autotoolset
manual:
http://autotoolset.sourceforge.net/tutorial.html
and this project suggestion by
I'm just reading the current FAQ under
1.3 Where can I get the latest versions of these tools?
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/faq/autotools-faq.html#Where-can-I-get-the-latest-versions-of-these-tools_003f
Wouldn't it be useful to give a little script that installs know-good
combinations
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/faq/autotools-faq.html#How-do-I-add-a-question-to-this-FAQ_003f
Do you think, it would be a good idea to just open up a git repo (on
github.com, for example) and put the autotools-faq.texi file there?
Or is there already a git repo for this?
Ralf
On 02/22/2011 11:35 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 22:30 +0100, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
That Linux distributions usually come with a good set of autotools is
irrelevant, since in my understanding all developers of *one* project
should work with the *same* autotools versions. Of
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 22:30 +0100, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
That Linux distributions usually come with a good set of autotools is
irrelevant, since in my understanding all developers of *one* project
should work with the *same* autotools versions. Of course, the project
might also compile
Ralf Hemmecke hemme...@gmail.com writes:
Sure. But it is also relevant if one developer adds a macro which is
only available in some recent version of automake, say. Another
developer might not yet have that automake version.
It doesn't really seem any worse than _any_ potential tool
* Ralf Hemmecke wrote on Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:41:20PM CET:
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/faq/autotools-faq.html#How-do-I-add-a-question-to-this-FAQ_003f
Do you think, it would be a good idea to just open up a git repo (on
github.com, for example) and put the autotools-faq.texi file
