* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:22:48PM CET:
On Thursday 18 November 2010, Nick Bowler wrote:
On 2010-11-18 20:31 +0100, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
+...@vindex @code{AM_V_GEN}
+...@c FIXME: wouldn't $(AM_V_SILENT) be clearer? Should we deprecate
+...@c $(AM_V_at)?
I came across an interesting bug: the perl coverage output for a full
run of the Automake test suite was showing a single invocation of the
installed automake program, rather than the uninstalled
$builddir/tests/automake-1.11a
which should have been run.
Some tracking revealed that this
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:15:12AM CET:
On Monday 15 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Well then we should adjust maintainer-check to not complain. Either
way, maintainer-check results should not deteriorate.
I'm not keen on meddling with the current
On Saturday 20 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:18:33PM CET:
I've realized that my patch on instspc.test split refactoring has
broken the release-stats target, since now there are other generated
tests besides the `*-p.test' tests.
I pushed this:
-*-*-*-
release-stats: account for more generated tests.
* Makefile.am (release-stats): Be sure to take into account all
the generated tests, by grepping the test scripts to decide which
ones of them are automatically generated.
---
ChangeLog |7 +++
Makefile.am |2
On Saturday 20 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:29:57PM CET:
On Thursday 18 November 2010, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
The `--output-dir' option of automake has been deprecated since versions
1.6.1 and 1.7, but then never removed.
On Saturday 20 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:22:48PM CET:
On Thursday 18 November 2010, Nick Bowler wrote:
On 2010-11-18 20:31 +0100, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
+...@vindex @code{AM_V_GEN}
+...@c FIXME: wouldn't
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 06:26:05PM CET:
* tests/defs: In the loop on $required tools: avoid subshells
where not neded.
OK except for the last hunk:
--- a/tests/defs
+++ b/tests/defs
@@ -297,12 +297,12 @@ do
*)
# Generic case: the tool must support
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 06:27:43PM CET:
* tests/defs.in: In the loop on $required tools, for gcc
and g++, also run gcc -v (resp. g++ -v), to get more
information, and for consistency with gcj.
Did this help you for anything in any way?
Patch is OK.
Thanks,
Ralf
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 06:18:15PM CET:
Tests defs: don't let useless variables leak in test scripts.
Tests defs: new subroutine `skip' for test skipping.
Tests defs: some cleanup and minor fixes.
No ticking clock for this patches at the moment; the clock will
On Saturday 20 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 06:26:05PM CET:
* tests/defs: In the loop on $required tools: avoid subshells
where not neded.
OK except for the last hunk:
--- a/tests/defs
+++ b/tests/defs
@@ -297,12 +297,12
On Saturday 20 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 06:27:43PM CET:
* tests/defs.in: In the loop on $required tools, for gcc
and g++, also run gcc -v (resp. g++ -v), to get more
information, and for consistency with gcj.
Did this help
On Saturday 20 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 06:18:15PM CET:
Tests defs: don't let useless variables leak in test scripts.
Tests defs: new subroutine `skip' for test skipping.
Tests defs: some cleanup and minor fixes.
No
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 02:14:57PM CET:
On Saturday 20 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 06:26:05PM CET:
# Generic case: the tool must support --version.
echo $me: running $tool --version
-
On Saturday 20 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:15:12AM CET:
On Monday 15 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Well then we should adjust maintainer-check to not complain. Either
way, maintainer-check results should not
15 matches
Mail list logo