On 2013-02-04 00:10, Peter Rosin wrote:
On 2013-02-03 21:42, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
I've pushed the promised patches to the rewindable branch
'experimental/preproc' (based off of maint). I'll also soon
send them to the list to simplify review (I will drop the
bug tracker from CC:, to avoid
On 02/04/2013 12:10 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
On 2013-02-03 21:42, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
I've pushed the promised patches to the rewindable branch
'experimental/preproc' (based off of maint). I'll also soon
send them to the list to simplify review (I will drop the
bug tracker from CC:, to
On 2013-02-04 12:23, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
On 02/04/2013 12:10 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
On 2013-02-03 21:42, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
I've pushed the promised patches to the rewindable branch
'experimental/preproc' (based off of maint). I'll also soon
send them to the list to simplify
On 2013-02-04 12:33, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
On 02/04/2013 10:35 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
Not sure what to do about it, or if it matters...
It does IMHO, since the failure you pointed out, albeit easy to
work around, wouldn't be very obvious to diagnose, from the point
of view of a
On 2/4/13 9:33 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
What about doubling the curly braces? As in '{{RELDIR}}'.
Would that be tolerable? Other possibilities (none particularly
pleasant either, IMHO):
{+RELDIR+}
{:RELDIR:}
{.RELDIR.}
{-RELDIR-}
Other proposals?
Using Automake's namespace,
On 02/04/2013 01:44 PM, Peter Johansson wrote:
On 2/4/13 9:33 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
What about doubling the curly braces? As in '{{RELDIR}}'.
Would that be tolerable? Other possibilities (none particularly
pleasant either, IMHO):
{+RELDIR+}
{:RELDIR:}
{.RELDIR.}
On 02/04/2013 01:04 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
On 2013-02-04 12:33, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
On 02/04/2013 10:35 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
Not sure what to do about it, or if it matters...
It does IMHO, since the failure you pointed out, albeit easy to
work around, wouldn't be very obvious to
On 2013-02-04 14:43, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
On 02/04/2013 01:04 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
I {{think}} this one will be the easiest on us of all.
BTW, that was a mix of on us all and on all of us, if
anyone didn't notice...
I tend to agree (but see Peter Johansson's proposal to use
On 02/04/2013 03:06 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
On 2013-02-04 14:43, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
On 02/04/2013 01:04 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
I {{think}} this one will be the easiest on us all.
I tend to agree (but see Peter Johansson's proposal to use
{AM_RELDIR} instead; what do you think about it?)
On 02/04/2013 10:19 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Because it would mix up very different concepts: a '@...@' substitution
is meant for something that depends on configure-time check (or at
least from code in configure), and is substituted the same in *every*
Makefile and makefile fragment;
Not
On 02/04/2013 06:33 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/04/2013 10:19 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Because it would mix up very different concepts: a '@...@' substitution
is meant for something that depends on configure-time check (or at
least from code in configure), and is substituted the same in
11 matches
Mail list logo
