Re: bug#11356: automake 1.12 and (C) 2011

2012-05-01 Thread Peter Johansson
Hi Stefano, Sorry about this late reply. On 04/28/2012 12:34 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: --- a/bootstrap +++ b/bootstrap @@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ dosubst () { rm -f $2 in=`echo $1 | sed 's,^.*/,,'` + current_year=`date +%Y` test -n $current_year \ +|| { echo $me: cannot get current

Re: bug#11356: automake 1.12 and (C) 2011

2012-05-01 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hi Peter, thanks for the feedback. On 05/01/2012 02:23 AM, Peter Johansson wrote: Hi Stefano, Sorry about this late reply. On 04/28/2012 12:34 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: --- a/bootstrap +++ b/bootstrap @@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ dosubst () { rm -f $2 in=`echo $1 | sed 's,^.*/,,'`

Re: bug#11356: automake 1.12 and (C) 2011

2012-04-28 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 04/28/2012 12:51 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: I think I'll steal the wording from coreutils' README: For any copyright year range specified as - in this package note that the range specifies every single year in that closed interval. Patch coming up tomorrow (unless someone

Re: bug#11356: automake 1.12 and (C) 2011

2012-04-28 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 04/27/2012 04:34 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: Hi Eric, thanks for the suggestion. On 04/27/2012 02:05 PM, Eric Blake wrote: aclocal (GNU $PACKAGE) $VERSION -Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. +Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. But this is still prone to

Re: bug#11356: automake 1.12 and (C) 2011

2012-04-28 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-04-27 16:34, Stefano Lattarini wrote: -# Copyright (C) 1996-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. +# Copyright (C) 1996-$RELEASE_YEAR Free Software Foundation, Inc. Isn't a paradigm like that risky for the case of a late maintenance release a couple of years after the last release on some

Re: bug#11356: automake 1.12 and (C) 2011

2012-04-27 Thread Stefano Lattarini
tags 11356 + patch severity 11356 minor close 11356 thanks On 04/27/2012 05:30 AM, Peter Johansson wrote: Hello, Hi Peter, thanks for the report. Just a tiny nit. After installing the new version (1.12) of automake I noticed that 'automake --version' outputs: automake (GNU automake) 1.12

Re: bug#11356: automake 1.12 and (C) 2011

2012-04-27 Thread Eric Blake
On 04/27/2012 03:18 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: tags 11356 + patch severity 11356 minor close 11356 thanks On 04/27/2012 05:30 AM, Peter Johansson wrote: Hello, Hi Peter, thanks for the report. Just a tiny nit. After installing the new version (1.12) of automake I noticed that

Re: bug#11356: automake 1.12 and (C) 2011

2012-04-27 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hi Eric, thanks for the suggestion. On 04/27/2012 02:05 PM, Eric Blake wrote: aclocal (GNU $PACKAGE) $VERSION -Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. +Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. But this is still prone to error next year. Since this is already a .in

Re: bug#11356: automake 1.12 and (C) 2011

2012-04-27 Thread Jack Kelly
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/27/2012 03:18 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: On 04/27/2012 05:30 AM, Peter Johansson wrote: +++ b/aclocal.in @@ -840,9 +840,8 @@ $output;    # name in the header.    $output = # generated automatically by aclocal

Re: bug#11356: automake 1.12 and (C) 2011

2012-04-27 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 04/28/2012 12:36 AM, Jack Kelly wrote: On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/27/2012 03:18 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: On 04/27/2012 05:30 AM, Peter Johansson wrote: +++ b/aclocal.in @@ -840,9 +840,8 @@ $output; # name in the header. $output =