OK for master?
* m4/regex.m4: Document the `AM_WITH_REGEX' macro as obsoleted,
and tell that it should be removed two years from now.
(AM_WITH_REGEX): Raise an m4-time warning of the obsolete
category when this macro is used.
* doc/automake.texi (Public Macros): Move description of
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:32:49PM CET:
* m4/regex.m4: Document the `AM_WITH_REGEX' macro as obsoleted,
I think technically obsolete is right here, without trailing d.
and tell that it should be removed two years from now.
s/tell/state/
(AM_WITH_REGEX): Raise an
* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 08:14:38PM CET:
This updated patch passes the tests suggested by Stefano. Considering
that Automake will rarely if ever be invoked from outside, MSYS, I stuck
with the colon as the sole separator for ACLOCAL_PATH.
The test suites leaves the
On Saturday 13 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:32:49PM CET:
* m4/regex.m4: Document the `AM_WITH_REGEX' macro as obsoleted,
I think technically obsolete is right here, without trailing d.
OK. All instances fixed.
and tell that it
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 01:39:04PM CET:
On Saturday 13 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:32:49PM CET:
Is rx a package? Where did you find traces to it?
There was this in automake.texi:
@cindex rx package
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:18:44PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Ideally, I would like to see testsuite coverage for each code path
(branch coverage) for new code. I understand that only Stefano is
able to produce this in reasonable amount of time, so whatever you guys
can manage is better
On Saturday 13 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 01:39:04PM CET:
On Saturday 13 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:32:49PM CET:
Is rx a package? Where did you find traces to it?
