Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc 'documentation'

in the binutils src dir exec: make do-install-html you'll get quite a bit of documentation in ${PREFIX}/share/doc -- Scanned by: ClamAV 0.88.7/2661/Tue Feb 27 04:36:59 2007 ___ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org

Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc-avr/avr-libc wiki

David McNab wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong, but that sounds like we'd better not have a wiki, because I can't think of anyone who's got the time to ensure it's perfect. Maybe it sounds like that to you. You might want to try taking meaning from what is actually written though. I wrote: Who

Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc-avr/avr-libc wiki

On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 07:23 -0500, Graham Davies wrote: Wikipedia is full of problems - systemic bias, errors, conflicting agendas etc, but it's a heck of a lot better than having no wikipedia at all. Wikipedia is not full of problems. Pages with bias are marked as such. Some pages are

[avr-gcc-list] Should this code work? 4.1.1

In what many or may not be a continuation of my problems with out-of-order code execution, with 4.1.1, I'd like to know why this code does not work (comments below the code): /* Code for AT90CAN64. */ #include avr/io.h #include util/delay.h void SPI_MasterInit(void); void SPI_MasterInit(void)

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Should this code work? 4.1.1

Shouldn't the declaration of shift be OUTSIDE the for block (or in the for expression). Otherwize, shift is always 1 and the if (0 == shift) can be optimized away. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Paddock Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007

RE: [avr-gcc-list] gcc-avr/avr-libc wiki

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of David McNab Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 11:52 AM Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc-avr/avr-libc wiki I'm still concerned that helping with the golden

RE: [avr-gcc-list] avrdude: Using debugWire to program flash

Hi Shaun, Emails have a tendency to get lost easily. Can you fill out a bug report on the avrdude project on Savannah? That way this issue won't be forgotten. Thanks, Eric Weddington -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Shaun

Re: [avr-gcc-list] Should this code work? 4.1.1

On Friday 02 March 2007 18:42, Francesco Sacchi wrote: Bob Paddock ha scritto: you see that the last rjmp is jumping to the point where shift is reinitialized with '1' (r18/r19). Moving 'uint16_t shift = 1;' out of the for(;;){} and into the top of main(){} makes the code work ok.

Re: [avr-gcc-list] Should this code work? 4.1.1

Bob Paddock wrote: for(;;){} is a endless loop, how is until execution of that block ends in any way. being fulfilled here? The block begins with the open brace and ends with the close brace. The block ends when control falls out of the bottom and for ( ; ; ) takes over for the next

Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc-avr/avr-libc wiki

Eric Weddington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For example, the current documentation is done via this Doxygen tool. It's not a perfect tool. Of course, if someone would want to see something else used, say some SGML or XML dialect, as long as it's readily available and operating system independent