What is this warning and what array is it referring to?
Thank you!
--
Best Regards,
-- Royce Pereira
Test
--
Best Regards,
-- Royce Pereira
it did not delete the path entries.
after deleting them manually, problem solved1
Thank you !!
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 11:50, wrote:
>
> On 13.10.21 17:31, Royce Pereira wrote:
>> Today I started getting this error when i run make:
>>
>> make: *** No rule to make t
:
I'm using windows 10 and make.exe is in :
C:\MinGW\msys\1.0\bin\make.exe
Which is defined in my path.
Please advise. Thank you!
--
Best Regards,
-- Royce Pereira
dows" those strange errors disappear..
>>
>> Another thing you can try is:
>> make --dry-run
>> You can examine the commands that make would generate for any errors.
>>
>>
>> -- Nigel
>>
>> On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 at 11:48, Georg-Johan
op.
Again, this is probably because of the invalid path above (c\;\...) but i
cant figure out the source of this invalid path.
Could someone kindly shed some light on this? Thanks!
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 15:13, Royce Pereira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ok, I deleted all generated files save my c file
Hi,
Ok, I deleted all generated files save my c file.
Now the error is not displayed, and the project compiles.
However, it would be interesting to know what causes it !
Thank you,
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 15:08, Royce Pereira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I am getting a strange er
=.s)
$(REMOVE) $(SRC:.c=.d)
$(REMOVE) .dep/*
# Include the dependency files.
-include $(shell mkdir .dep 2>/dev/null) $(wildcard .dep/*)
# Listing of phony targets.
.PHONY : all begin finish end sizebefore sizeafter gccversion \
build elf hex eep lss sym coff extcoff \
clean clean_list program debug gdb-config
--
Best Regards,
-- Royce Pereira
*), (const void *)eepLoc, num) ;
>
> What is num?
>
>-=Dave
> --
> *From:* AVR-GCC-list
> on behalf of Royce Pereira
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 9, 2020 8:18 AM
> *To:* avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
> *Subject:* Saving & retreiving a structure
rn 0 ;
}
//---
The getPgm function uses the read block api but retreives garbage(0x);
What am I doing wrong ?
Thank you!
--
Best Regards,
-- Royce Pereira
--
Best Regards,
-- Royce Pereira
)
I ignored this warning for a long time.
Recently, I got curious as to the nature of the error.
So what has changed recently ? Thanks!
--
Best Regards,
-- Royce Pereira
install
mingw C/C++ compiler. Or give Atmel Studio another try.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Royce Pereira royc...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, as suggested, I tried MHV AVR tools,
If I run make clean (or make all) I get the following errors
make.exe clean all
The system cannot find the path
at 5:10 PM, Royce Pereira royc...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you!
Your link solved the issue ;-)
Best regards,
Royce
On Sep 10, 2014 10:09 AM, Dhakshinamoorthy, Soundararajan
soundararajan.dhakshinamoor...@atmel.com wrote:
Perhaps you could give this a try, in case you haven't.
http
saying that msys-intl-8.dll is missing.
So what's going on ?
Thank you.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Royce Pereira royc...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you.
I'll try it and report back in 24 hrs.
On Mar 27, 2015 1:47 PM, vasi vasi funl...@gmail.com wrote:
Royce, I did that already. https
Regards,
-- Royce Pereira
___
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
Lay a...@gjlay.de wrote:
Royce Pereira schrieb:
Hi,
What is the differenence between:
__flash const char myString[] = Hello There! ;
myString is a const array in flash that's initialized with Hello There!.
and
__flash const char *myString = Hello There! ;
myString is a non-const
Thank you, Georg-Johann,
I will try this and report. :)
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Georg-Johann Lay a...@gjlay.de wrote:
Am 06/13/2014 12:06 PM, schrieb Royce Pereira:
Hi all,
Continuing with the latest avr-gcc, and playing with the new '__flash'
qualifier, I'm facing some new
Thank you, Georg-Johann,
That was very informative !
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Georg-Johann Lay a...@gjlay.de wrote:
Am 06/12/2014 12:23 PM, schrieb Royce Pereira:
Hi,
I recently updated WinAVR to a newer version of the AVR-GCC toolchain,
downloaded from the Atmel site.
My version
, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Joerg Wunsch j...@uriah.heep.sax.de wrote:
Royce Pereira royc...@gmail.com wrote:
Even the libc documentation, which was once the bible of avr-gcc on
this is not accurate. The sample code just does not work.
Apparently, nobody noticed before. Please, file a bug
Thank you, all, for the guidance.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
senthil_kumar.selva...@atmel.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:02:58PM +0530, Royce Pereira wrote:
Thanks, Joerg,
This is news to me :) !
I googled for '__flash qualifier in AVR-GCC' and I
me an idea of what's happening and how to get rid of
the warnings ?
Thank You ! ^
--
Best Regards,
-- Royce Pereira
___
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc
((progmem))'
//-
But I have followed the avr-libc example exactly.
So why is this error thrown and whats the correct way to do this ?
Thank You.
--
Best Regards,
-- Royce Pereira
___
AVR-GCC-list mailing
...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Newer version of gcc have changed the progmem behaviour, it cannot be
applied to typedef anymore if I remember well.
const char * pgtmp_msg[] should solve your issue
Regards
Francois
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Royce Pereira royc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I
,};
^
Is there a proper way of doing this, now that the libc example too is
inaccurate ?
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Royce Pereira royc...@gmail.com wrote:
Francois,
No, that does not work.
In fact, it was *exactly* what i was using before (which was not as
per the libc examples).
But it gave
Sorry, the 'word' type means 'unsigned integer'.
I have a header that defines 'word'. :-)
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Royce Pereira royc...@gmail.com wrote:
I found that this does not throw an error:
const word pgtmp_msg[]PROGMEM =
{ ptmpUP_msg, ptmpDN_msg, ptmpCLG_msg
++.
___
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
--
Best Regards,
-- Royce Pereira
___
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list
senthil_kumar.selva...@atmel.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:58:54PM +0530, Royce Pereira wrote:
I'll try the various suggestions tomorrow.
But I'm surprised at the diverse replies.
Don't people declare an array of strings anymore ? :-)
Well, the compiler is now stricter
Hi, all,
Indeed there is no (code wise) difference between 32, 32L 32A (also
applies to other MPUs like Mega8 etc).
I recently tried a commercial compiler, where selection for 32, 32L,
32A was given separately, and posed the same query to them.
The answer was
All three are the same for the
Hi,
Your link opens a page that says This item is private .
I guess I need to login ? I am not registered there.
Is there another link or can the matter be reproduced here please ?
Regards,
--Royce
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Joerg Wunsch j...@uriah.heep.sax.de wrote:
Royce Pereira
Hi,
I had posted this issue a year ago, but got no reply. In the meantime,
I was using AVR studio for programming, so I forgot about this.
Now I'm returning to avrdude, and I again encountered curious problem .
My avrdude command line is:
avrdude -p t26 -u -U micro-cntr.hex -U
Hi,
I have a project built around a Tiny26.
It was compiled with WinAVR-20070525.
I'd stuck to this version for a long time, until recently when I upgraded to
20090313.
Soon after, I had to recompile my project due some change in specs.
Imagine my shock when AVRstudio complained that the
Hi,
Today I decided to try our Windows 7 (beta build 7077). This is the
build just before RC1.
I aso installed just today WinAVR 2090313.
I'm not sure if either one could be at fault.
When I try to use Avrdudein the DOS window, or thru a bat file,it
reads funny garbage at the end of the
Hi,
--
From: Weddington, Eric eric.wedding...@atmel.com
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 10:55 PM
To: Royce Pereira royc...@gmail.com; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] Windows 7 issue ? Avrdude - strange garbage at
endof filename
I dont think there exists a 'lcd.h' file with avr-gcc.
You need to write your own lcd code for the lcd you are using.
--Royce.
- Original Message -
From: ankit agarwal
To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
Sent: Sunday, 08 March, 2009 3:17 PM
Subject: [avr-gcc-list] inquiry
dear
Hi,
I'm using AVRdude.
While programming, I'm trying to retreive, and then write into the 1st 4
eeprom locations,, the calibration bytes.
The device gets programmed. Also the the calibration bytes are read to the
specifie file, but fails while writing to eeprom.
The command line, subsequent
Hi Eric,
- Original Message -
From: Royce Pereira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Eric Weddington [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Dean
Hi,
- Original Message -
From: Eric Weddington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recently I posted a rebased msys DLL (located in utils\bin in your
installation) in the AVR
Hi,
I found that this problem was removed after uninstalling 'Spyware Doctor'
from my PC.
Is there anyone else with similar experience - who knows what settings to do
in Spyware Doct ?
Thanks,
--Royce
- Original Message -
From: Royce Pereira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: avr-gcc-list
Hi,
Sorry for my rusty C,
In the following union
union
{
uint32_t as_ul;
struct
{
uint8_t by0;
uint8_t by1;
uint8_t by2;
uint8_t by3;
}
asbyte;
}
lvar;
What is the
Hi all,
What does the following warning mean?
warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
Here is the context:
I have a AVR I'm trying to connect to a DS1307 RTC chip via TWI.
To check the integrity of the DS1307 internal ram, I plan to write 4 bytes,
Hi,
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 19:57:54 +0530, David Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 11:25:30PM -0700, Dave N6NZ wrote:
#define CHK_13070x55
if(twi_read() != ~CHK_1307) ok= 0;
// ^^
//The offending line.
I believe what is going on is the C standard
Hi,
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:02:32 +0530, David Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Royce Pereira wrote:
So I have to write more 'C' code :) to get the same stuff done, in
the 'new smarter' compiler! Interesting.
Doesn't seem right, some how.
Regards, --Royce.
It might not seem right
Hi, David,
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 02:24:16 +0530, David Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So? Why did *you* change compilers if the old one did what you wanted?
If it doesn't do what you want then its your choice whether to change
your code to conform or to revert to the compiler that did what you
Hi all,
In the latest WinAVR (avr-gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 (WinAVR 20070525) I found this.
Check this out:
//==
void delay(unsigned del_cnt)
{
while(del_cnt--);
return;
}
//===
Compiles as (from the .lss file):
//===
Hi,
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:47:26 +0530, David Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is probably in the FAQ somewhere - if not, it should be!
The compiler is smart enough to figure out that your delay function does
no useful work - thus the optimiser does not generate any code. This is
) {
volatile unsigned int n = del_cnt;
while (n--);
}
So I have to write more 'C' code :) to get the same stuff done, in the 'new
smarter' compiler! Interesting.
Doesn't seem right, some how.
Regards,
--Royce.
mvh.,
David
Royce Pereira wrote:
Hi all,
In the latest WinAVR (avr-gcc
Hi,
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:42:18 +0530, Klaus Rudolph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The code has been optimized. Well done!
If you need the variable access use 'volatile'
Why does it get optimised?
I understand the meaning of 'volatile', but why is it required here ?
It is clear that the variable
Hi Klaus,
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:57:14 +0530, Klaus Rudolph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please use optimizer! Something like -O2 -O3 -Os ... as you need!
My makefile already has
OPT = s
Simplify your delay loop:
void delay(volatile word cnt) { ...
Already tried that. No change.
If it's
Hi all,
OK fine I agree.
we have to use 'volatile' and all.
But why must it generate such horrid code...
(I reproduce the comparison again below to get the *real* issue into focus)
The compiler output with the 'correct' code ('volatile' used):
Hi David,
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 02:07:54 +0530, David McNab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Surely it can't be too hard to place a table of function pointers into
flash, retrieve function pointers from this table, and 'call' them.
I remember as a newbie to the list, I'd asked this very question a
Hi all,
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:45:09 +0530, Gavin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is another key located at:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\WinAVR
What I've done to work around this problem is have a
generic name in the registry and rename the folder the
I've not been able to
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:14:21 +0530, kitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 22 November 2006 05:57 IST, David Kelly wrote:
Some MCU families (believe HC12 is one) have a separate register for
reading the port's actual input/external value, and another for
reading output latches
Hi,
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 13:39:36 +0530, Nigel Winterbottom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: larry barello
Specifically I was looking for an efficient way to encode
(bSomeBool ^ (SomeBitMask SomeVariable))
to get a true/false output.
Hi all,
I have a delay loop thus:
//
void delay(unsigned long count)
{
while(count)
--count;
}
//
When I call :
delay(2*33000);
I get:
878: 60 ed ldi r22, 0xD0 ; 208
87a: 71 e0
hi,
so what was the problem?
--royce
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 08:00:36 +0530, Trampas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I went and rewrote the code and it all works now.
Trampas
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Trampas
Sent: Friday, August 11,
Hi,
On Wed, 05 Jul 2006 17:57:50 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a total newbie to avr-gcc and just compiled a first program. It merely
fits the program memory so I've started to optimize..
In my code there lots of places where 1-2-3 bits are flipped in I/O port:
My suggestion is to
Hu Justin,
should'nt the array be declared as const unsigned char
Ut doesnt matter here as I wont be doing any math or arithmetic on the
elements. If it was not a string, then we would have to be more careful.
--Royce.
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client:
Hi,
Sorry for my rusty C, but how does one insert a hex value into a string?
I tried
const char messg[] PROGMEM= Temp= \xdfC; //display temperature in deg
Centigrade
and
const char messg[] PROGMEM= Temp= \xdf\C;
I'm using a 16x2 LCD, where 0xdf is the hex value of the little 'o' degree
Hi Ned,
On Mon, 01 May 2006 19:08:13 +0530, Ned Konz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I get the same in my AVR-GCC .lst, .lss etc output files thru
my makefile ?
Sure... just postprocess the files to add a header.
Attached is a Perl script that adds such a header.
Great - Thanks !
--Royce.
Hi,
On Tue, 02 May 2006 01:07:29 +0530, Joerg Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Royce Pereira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I get the same in my AVR-GCC .lst, .lss etc output files thru my
makefile ?
Even though Ned already showed you a way, I'm curious: what additional
information would gain
Hi,
I am using besides AVR-GCC, SDCC(freeware mcs51 compiler). The latter generates the
following lines at the start of every output, which I find very useful - the date
time actually:
1 ;
2 ; File
Hi,
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:37:18 +0530, Abdul Malik Khan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tried
const unsigned char mask[] = {1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128};
but compiler places it in RAM istead of ROM.
---
Have you read the avr-libc manual the FAQ therein?
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:39:26 +0530, Eric Weddington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, let's see if anything is broken on this one. Please let me know ASAP
if you see anything wrong. Or if anything looks right for that matter.
in the last WinAVR, I used to get a summary of memory usage at the end
Hi,
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 00:26:57 +0530, Eric Weddington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in the last WinAVR, I used to get a summary of memory usage at the end
of the compilation.
The new 2006 version does not do this.
Yes, and my apologies for not explaining it properly in the user manual.
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 04:42:22 +0530, developer2112 (sent by Nabble.com) [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem is solved... I was using the internal clock, but I didn't think that
would stop me from getting a 2400 baudratebut I found that if I disconnect
the cable for the port and jiggle it
Hi,
There was an error in my example, corrected below!
//
unsigned todayssunset;
const unsigned sunrise[2][4] PROGMEM ={ 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9 };
todayssunset= pgm_read_byte(sunrise[x][y]);
Sorry, thats:
todayssunset= pgm_read_word(sunrise[x][y]);
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:42:38 +0530, David Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2. In a Win98-SE installation, paths were not added to the environment
automatically (more serious).
I can see how setting the path at install time can be convenient for some
people, but it should never be more than
Hi,
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:54:03 +0530, Eric Weddington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. In a Win98-SE installation, paths were not added to the environment
automatically (more serious).
We (Colin and I) have had difficulties with that one. I'm not sure that
I can reliably add paths on a Win98
Hi,
Good to know the new WinAVR relase might be out next week. Thanks Eric !
Just to summarise a couple o'gaffs from the last version (so they dont
repeat).
But I'm sure this stuff is corrected in the new version.
1. Even after unselecting PN during installation, the shortcut for PN
still
Hi
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 13:00:03 +0530, varsha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello all,
i'm using avr-gcc (GCC) 3.4.3 compiler and Atmega 16 as a MCU.
for crc calculation i'm using inline assembly code.
for example..
__asm__ __volatile__
(
lsl r11\n\t
rol r12\n\t
rol r13
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 12:37:40 +0530, varsha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
what is the proper way to write a delay routine?
I use this:
//
void delay(unsigned count)
{
while(count--);
return;
}
Hi,
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 01:00:44 +0530, Joerg Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As Zane D. Purvis wrote:
How about changing the name to ISR, which would do the same thing
as the existing SIGNAL?
Then, SIGNAL and INTERRUPT can both be deprecated (avoiding future
confusion).
It has been
Hi,
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 11:26:49 +0530, Joerg Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The only fix that is needed is to state prominantly in the first few
few paragraphs what the difference is, and all confusion will
disappear.
Nope, I rather did what we (avr-libc-dev) agreed quite some time ago:
Hi,
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 00:26:11 +0530, Joerg Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/avr-libc-user-manual/group__avr__interrupts.html
Yep, I find it a lot better/clearer :-)
Thanks for the feedback, I committed the new description to CVS.
Just asking - why not have
Hi,
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 00:52:08 +0530, Joerg Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For the rare cases where __attribute__((interrupt)) is really needed,
One typical case where I use it is to interrupt my keyboard/display
scanning interrupt routine, whenever a zero crossover of mains occurs.
Hi,
On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 21:36:23 +0530, Vincent Trouilliez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, new to the list and avr C programming... first question on here,
about interrupt routines...
In the relevant part of the avr-libc PDF, section 6.20.1, it says :
An interrupt routine is defined with
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:22:53 +0530, Mitchell James
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This is a little off subject
I cant answer your query, but AVR-CHAT is a better place for non AVR-GCC
queries :)
--Royce.
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Hi,
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 03:04:02 +0530, Nigel Winterbottom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From:James A.R. Koehler
If the consensus is that we need to be protected against ourselves by
having all the existing prolog in the two existing interrupt service
methods, perhaps
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:11:17 +0530, Gaël Rossignol
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have info about KamAVR the new editor for windows based on
avr-gcc and does anyone use it?
I just would like if the C++ will be aviaible on this platform and
eventually when this will be released?
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 01:19:04 +0530, Joerg Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
David Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just recently written a program for an AVR Tiny 12 using
avr-gcc, and thought others might be interested.
Interesting approach. Bruce Lightner once also reported
hI,
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 09:35:38 +0530, Russell Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Royce Pereira wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 06:18:20 +0530, Hugo González Monteverde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why exactly do you want to return to a different place? Looks like
another, less complicated
Hello,
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:41:20 +0530, Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Royce Pereira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Is there a macro to read or write a long word (32 bits) to eeprom?
For the last hour I've been trying to write one unsuccessfully.
Not directly, but you can do
81 matches
Mail list logo
