- From: "Erik Christiansen"
> <dva...@internode.on.net>
> To: <avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 4:59 AM
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] possible optimize bugg
>
>
>> Reply-To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
>>
>> On 16.
nts are lumped
together.
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Christiansen" <dva...@internode.on.net>
To: <avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 4:59 AM
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] possible optimize bugg
Reply-To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
On 16.01.18 01:
Reply-To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
On 16.01.18 01:17, georg chambert wrote:
>
> msg_on[0] = 0b10001000; // address
>
> msg_on[1] = 0b; // PWZS Tmmm : (?) mmm = cool
>
> msg_on[2] = 0b1100; // , ; 23c , high vent
>
> msg_on[3] = 0b1100; // , 0 ; parity
>
> -
Hi,
I have been doing a bit uggly/lazy thing, which I think the optimiztion guys
thought was stupid enough to do something to,
however I think they messed up;
// ON
msg_on[0] = 0b10001000; // address
msg_on[1] = 0b; // PWZS Tmmm : (?) mmm = cool
msg_on[2] = 0b1100; // , ;