Re: [avr-gcc-list] possible optimize bugg

2018-01-16 Thread David Brown
- From: "Erik Christiansen" > <dva...@internode.on.net> > To: <avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org> > Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 4:59 AM > Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] possible optimize bugg > > >> Reply-To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org >> >> On 16.

Re: [avr-gcc-list] possible optimize bugg

2018-01-16 Thread georg chambert
nts are lumped together. - Original Message - From: "Erik Christiansen" <dva...@internode.on.net> To: <avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 4:59 AM Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] possible optimize bugg Reply-To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org On 16.01.18 01:

Re: [avr-gcc-list] possible optimize bugg

2018-01-15 Thread Erik Christiansen
Reply-To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org On 16.01.18 01:17, georg chambert wrote: > > msg_on[0] = 0b10001000; // address > > msg_on[1] = 0b; // PWZS Tmmm : (?) mmm = cool > > msg_on[2] = 0b1100; // , ; 23c , high vent > > msg_on[3] = 0b1100; // , 0 ; parity > > -

[avr-gcc-list] possible optimize bugg

2018-01-15 Thread georg chambert
Hi, I have been doing a bit uggly/lazy thing, which I think the optimiztion guys thought was stupid enough to do something to, however I think they messed up; // ON msg_on[0] = 0b10001000; // address msg_on[1] = 0b; // PWZS Tmmm : (?) mmm = cool msg_on[2] = 0b1100; // , ;