WOW. I will definitely study your message. It will take time to all of us.
But my scepticism was not about templates but about writing embedded code in C++ instead of C/Assembler/InlineAssembler. Interesting what would you get if you would write one more example in plain good
WOW. I will definitely study your message. It will take time to all of us.
But my scepticism was not about templates but about writing embedded code in
C++ instead of C/Assembler/InlineAssembler. Interesting what would you get
if you would write one more example in plain good C.
I pasted some
On Apr 27, 2006, at 11:31 PM, dimax un wrote:
WOW. I will definitely study your message. It will take time to all
of us.
But my scepticism was not about templates but about writing
embedded code in C++ instead of C/Assembler/InlineAssembler.
Interesting what would you get if you would
On Apr 25, 2006, at 10:48 AM, dimax un wrote:
Never heard that C++ makes small code especially templates and
especially in embedded systems.
Actually, templates are the best hope for small code using C++.
The secret is to have the right kind of templates, and to use the
compiler to do as
Never heard that C++ makes small code especially templates and especially in embedded systems.
Micro Connection to the Macro Vision
http://www.xdimax.com
No, it just occurred to me
