Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0

2009-05-06 Thread Steven Michalske
for any of us to help You must provide the options you used to compile. provided compilable code snippets with the exact command line options you used. it would be great if you made a makefile that ran the tests too. -Os between the GCC versions most likely don't have the same options,

Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0

2009-05-06 Thread David Kelly
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 12:44:42PM -0600, Sean D'Epagnier wrote: I was trying to reduce the size of my binary so it would fit on some 128kb parts. I normally used gcc 4.2.2 for this project, but decided to try gcc 4.5.0. To my surprise, the resulting binary was 3.5kb _larger_ with the

RE: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0

2009-05-06 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org [mailto:avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu. org] On Behalf Of Sean D'Epagnier Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 12:45 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list]