Is there any way to place a variable [in my case an array of char] at an
absolute position using just C statements ?
I am aware of the method of defining a section, placing the variable
into the section and then using a linker flag to define where this
section is supposed to be located.
I
As Wojtek Kaniewski wrote:
What about the SIG_ prefix? If we'll move to something else than
SIGNAL(), I think that it should be dropped or somehow hidden from
the users.
Very good point. I've been thinking about adding a second set of
vector names anyway. Our names are completely
For the whole SIGNAL vs INTERRUPT flame:
I'm with 'deprecate booth', cause of ambiguous (and maybe a bit
stupid) naming.
SIGNAL is a normal interrupt, (I'd like INT for it, but integer is
already int, so) i really like the ISR name idea.
since INTERRUPT is an eXtended interrupt (with a sei) it
Joerg Wunsch wrote:
As Wojtek Kaniewski wrote:
What about the SIG_ prefix? If we'll move to something else than
SIGNAL(), I think that it should be dropped or somehow hidden from
the users.
Very good point. I've been thinking about adding a second set of
vector names anyway. Our names
On Sep 9, 2005, at 2:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Be careful ! You use an 15ns SRAM (as I see so far in the part
number). They will draw a bit more current than 70ns SRAM's. Can
you post the Currents from the datasheet ?
Back in the bad old days a -15 was a 150 ns part. To answer the
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Szikra István wrote:
BTW, util/... would be a good place for avr/crc16.h too.
Unfortunately crc16.h is not completely independent from avr hw on the
account it uses inline asm, and not (ansi) c.
I believe that it's about functionality, not implementation. Delays and
CRC
I purchased the part from Jameco. I wanted the NS62256H-15NC, Jameco
shows ATT7C199P-15. . The part I receied was UM61m256K-15, with a
fancy 'm'. The data sheet is for an AS7C256(5v)/
From the data sheet, Max operating current is 115 ma.
Standby is 4 ma.
I do not have the exact datasheet for
2005/9/9, E. Weddington [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- I do like the idea that Royce has (above) about naming the ISR
function any name. However, I agree with Joerg, in that it would take an
awful lot of effort. Perhaps someday, but not now.
mspgcc interrupts are handled that way.
Quoting from the
Dave,
This creates a pointer to a specific memory location but does *not*
allocate the memory. The linker will still place other variables into
this memory space.
What I actually want to achieve is reserving a memory space from 0x100
onwards by allocating an absolute variable or a memory
Wojtek Kaniewski wrote:
Joerg Wunsch wrote:
My only concern is to not pollute the include/avr subdirectory itself
too much.
I'd prefer those functions to be in util/* than avr/generic/*.
Me too
and, if it avr specific than rather avr/util/* than avr/generic/*
i also suggest moving
Hi,
I did some more work on an experimetal utility to parse the part description
XML files from AVRStudio into device specific include files. I still have to
do a bit more work on it, but I think that the idea will work. I was able
to generate vector macros, register macros and bit macros from
Joerg Wunsch wrote:
As Wojtek Kaniewski wrote:
Very good point. I've been thinking about adding a second set of
vector names anyway. Our names are completely self-invented. In the
long run, I'd rather like to migrate the names as they appear in the
Atmel XML files, which incidentally
Oh well, yet another mass followup. Sorry if that's messing up your
thread displays. ;-)
As Szikra Istvan wrote:
I'd prefer those functions to be in util/* than avr/generic/*.
Me too and, if it avr specific than rather avr/util/* than
avr/generic/*
As that still has the problem of adding
Joerg Wunsch wrote:
Oh well, yet another mass followup. Sorry if that's messing up your
thread displays. ;-)
I think it's hopeless now. :-)
Do we still need copies to avr-gcc-list? Or can everyone agree to go
take this to avr-libc-dev only? (I'd like to not get two copies of
14 matches
Mail list logo
