For those that care, and ignoring the flame war, I believe that your
(Klaus) problem likely stems from the following GCC bug:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70435
Sadly, support for C++ in AVR GCC is not a priority, so I wouldn't expect
it to be fixed. I've been able to work around
On 11/4/21 8:36 am, Trampas Stern wrote:
Actually C++ is not slower or more bloat than C, depending on the features used.
For example I do not use RTTI or exceptions, so that makes it about the same as
C for size. Yes you have to turn these features off in your compiler (-fno-rtti,
Trampas Stern,
I'm sorry, but I've got to chime in here grasshopper. David Kelly put
it well: just "don't use C++"!
I somehow knew that this would start a flame war. :-)
[FLAME ON] We've been there, done that, bought the T-shirt, here in
forums like this before, going back many decades!
Actually C++ is not slower or more bloat than C, depending on the features
used.
For example I do not use RTTI or exceptions, so that makes it about the
same as C for size. Yes you have to turn these features off in your
compiler (-fno-rtti, -fno-exceptions). Sure you have trampolines or jump
On Apr 10, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Trampas Stern wrote:
> If you guys have a better way I would love to know.
Don’t use C++?
What does object-oriented coding do for embedded projects? It’s akin to using
printf(). Slow and lots of bloat.
Time once was I put uint32 in a union so as to code ++
Hi,
Am 10.04.21 um 17:26 schrieb Jonathan Wakely:
Dummy<1> d1;
This doesn't cause the instantiation of the member function.
Have you tried an explicit instantiation?
template class Dummy<1>;
Did not change anything.
If I use my original code, I get the instantiation of the
I wish there was a better way to interrupt handlers in classes, for
embedded. For example I write a UART class as a driver which I
initialize by passing a pointer to hardware address. However because
different UARTs use different interrupt vectors I end up having to have the
extern C and create
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021, 15:07 Klaus Rudolph via Gcc-help,
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> if I write a class with static member function I can use it as an
> interrupt handler as follows:
>
> class Dummy
> {
> static void Handler() __asm__("__vector_10")
> __attribute__((__signal__, __used__,
Hi all,
if I write a class with static member function I can use it as an
interrupt handler as follows:
class Dummy
{
static void Handler() __asm__("__vector_10")
__attribute__((__signal__, __used__, __externally_visible__));
};
void Dummy::Handler()
{
}
I can see the vector is entered
