RE: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] Constant address to programmemory in C

2007-11-23 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Shaun Jackman Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 1:57 PM To: Joerg Wunsch; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] Constant address to programmemory in C On

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] Constant address to programmemory in C

2007-11-25 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Shaun Jackman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 10:39 AM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: Joerg Wunsch; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] Constant address to programmemory in C On Nov 23, 2007 10

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Intel hex record types

2007-11-25 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Wouter van Gulik Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 2:51 AM To: Scott Morken Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Intel hex record types Scott Morken schreef: What

RE: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized

2007-12-11 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K. Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 3:44 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Cc: Nathan Moore Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized Alas, the usage of div()

RE: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized

2007-12-11 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K. Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 5:37 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized On Wednesday 12 December 2007 09:29, Weddington

RE: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized

2007-12-12 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Nathan Moore Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 9:26 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized Thank you for your explination Bjoern. I

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Howto put constants on fixed address

2007-12-19 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Zizka Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 9:13 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] Howto put constants on fixed address Hi, I need to put some constants on specific

[avr-gcc-list] WinAVR 20071221 Released

2007-12-20 Thread Weddington, Eric
Hi All, It's finally here, just in time for the holidays! WinAVR 20071221. Very Special Thanks to all the contributors and all the toolchain maintainers: Joerg Wunsch, Anatoly Sokolov, Dmitry Xmelkov, Denis Chertykov, Marek Michalkiewicz, and anyone else I may have forgotten. Because we're

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Bug 31786 spill in class 'BASE_POINTER_REGS'

2008-01-01 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Andrew Hutchinson Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 1:11 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] Bug 31786 spill in class 'BASE_POINTER_REGS' In particular 31786 - which is

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Where to find linker script examples? (was Howtoput constants on fixed address)

2008-01-02 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Jan Fristedt Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 1:05 PM To: avr-gcc List Subject: [avr-gcc-list] Where to find linker script examples? (was Howtoput constants on fixed address) Hi all,

[avr-gcc-list] WinAVR 20071221 patches

2008-01-08 Thread Weddington, Eric
Hi All, Just a quick note to let interested parties know that the patches used for WinAVR 20071221 have been committed to the WinAVR project on SourceForge (in the patches module of the CVS repository) and it is tagged with WinAVR-20071221. Thanks, Eric Weddington

RE: [avr-gcc-list] GCC-AVR Register optimisations

2008-01-10 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Andrew Hutchinson Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 6:52 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] GCC-AVR Register optimisations Hi all, just spend some days going over

RE: [avr-gcc-list] GCC-AVR Register optimisations

2008-01-10 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 11:48 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org; Weddington, Eric Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] GCC-AVR Register optimisations - Changing the register order, while it seems promising

Simulator for GCC Testing [was: RE: [Fwd: Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC-AVR Register optimisations]]

2008-01-11 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Andrew Hutchinson Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 6:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC-AVR Register optimisations] Here my

AVR Benchmark Test Suite [was: RE: [avr-gcc-list] GCC-AVR Register optimisations]

2008-01-11 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Dave N6NZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 1:35 PM To: gEDA user mailing list (by accident) Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC-AVR Register optimisations Hi, Over the course of years I have worked in and managed various

RE: Simulator for GCC Testing [was: RE: [Fwd: Re: [avr-gcc-list]GCC-AVR Register optimisations]]

2008-01-13 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Paulo Marques [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 8:21 AM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: Andrew Hutchinson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Klaus Rudolph Subject: Re: Simulator for GCC Testing [was: RE

RE: [avr-gcc-list] '-morder' option with Avr-libc: comparison table

2008-01-13 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K. Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 3:34 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] '-morder' option with Avr-libc: comparison table Hi. Summary results for Avr-libc

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Simulator for GCC Testing

2008-01-13 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Andrew Hutchinson Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 6:39 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Simulator for GCC Testing I has resurrected my testsuite setup for

RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr gcc for java

2008-01-13 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of andi Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 7:27 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] avr gcc for java Is there avr gcc for java ? The last time I tried to build the Java

RE: AVR Benchmark Test Suite [was: RE: [avr-gcc-list] GCC-AVR Register optimisations]

2008-01-13 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Dave N6NZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 4:19 PM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: John Regehr; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: AVR Benchmark Test Suite [was: RE: [avr-gcc-list] GCC-AVR Register optimisations] Weddington

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Missed optimisations

2008-01-14 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of David Brown Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 7:01 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] Missed optimisations I've just tried out the crc code I posted recently on avr-chat:

RE: [avr-gcc-list] '-morder' option with Avr-libc: comparison table

2008-01-14 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:30 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] '-morder' option with Avr-libc: comparison table Weddington, Eric [EMAIL

RE: AVR Benchmark Test Suite [was: RE: [avr-gcc-list] GCC-AVRRegisteroptimisations]

2008-01-14 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of John Regehr Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:33 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: RE: AVR Benchmark Test Suite [was: RE: [avr-gcc-list] GCC-AVRRegisteroptimisations] application

RE: AVR Benchmark Test Suite [was: RE: [avr-gcc-list]GCC-AVRRegisteroptimisations]

2008-01-14 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of John Regehr Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 2:07 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: RE: AVR Benchmark Test Suite [was: RE: [avr-gcc-list]GCC-AVRRegisteroptimisations] Okaaayy. The

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Cygwin GCC build cc1.exe file size

2008-01-15 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Andrew Hutchinson Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 6:13 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] Cygwin GCC build cc1.exe file size My build of gcc under windows (cygwin)

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Cygwin GCC build cc1.exe file size

2008-01-16 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of David Brown Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 4:09 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Cygwin GCC build cc1.exe file size I think I heard somewhere that some of

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Success running the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-16 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Paulo Marques Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 7:38 AM To: Dmitry K. Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Success running the testsuite with avrtest Paulo Marques

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Success running the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-17 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Paulo Marques Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 5:13 AM To: Dmitry K. Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Success running the testsuite with avrtest I guess most of

RE: [avr-gcc-list] How to get low byte off a function address?

2008-01-19 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Wouter van Gulik Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 8:16 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] How to get low byte off a function address? Dear list, How do I do this:

RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-19 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Paulo Marques Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 11:27 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest Hi, all I've been running the

RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-19 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Paulo Marques Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 11:27 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest Hi, all I've been running the

RE: [avr-gcc-list] testsuite needs sys/types.h

2008-01-20 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Paulo Marques Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 8:03 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] testsuite needs sys/types.h Hi, all I'm still chasing down bugs with the

RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-21 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Paulo Marques Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 5:15 PM To: Andrew Hutchinson Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org; Andy Hutchinson Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with

RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-21 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Paulo Marques Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 5:14 PM To: Andrew Hutchinson Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest One

RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-21 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Paulo Marques [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 6:14 PM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: Andrew Hutchinson; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest Thanks, but please bare

RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-21 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Andrew Hutchinson Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 6:56 PM To: Paulo Marques; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest Ok my latest

RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-21 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: John Regehr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 8:58 PM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: Paulo Marques; Andrew Hutchinson; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org; Andy Hutchinson Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Typo in help message of avr-as 2.18

2008-01-22 Thread Weddington, Eric
Hi Dmitry, It may take some time to get to this bug. Could you fill out a bug report at the GNU Binutils project?: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ That way the issue won't get lost. Thanks! Eric W. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Whetstone Benchmark

2008-01-22 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K. Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 3:08 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Whetstone Benchmark On Monday 21 January 2008 11:00, Weddington, Eric wrote

[avr-gcc-list] AVR GCC bug #34932

2008-01-22 Thread Weddington, Eric
Hi All, For those who are interested, I filed GCC bug #34932: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34932 Which is from WinAVR bug #1860717: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1860717group _id=68108atid=520074 This is also now listed in the AVR toolchain bug list.

Delta [was: RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest]

2008-01-22 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: John Regehr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 8:58 PM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: Paulo Marques; Andrew Hutchinson; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org; Andy Hutchinson Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Whetstone Benchmark

2008-01-22 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Andy H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 7:35 PM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: Dmitry K.; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Whetstone Benchmark Sorry libc seems to be at 1.2.0 - I have not got around to updating

RE: [avr-gcc-list] C code calling ASM functions

2008-01-25 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Gre7g Luterman Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 9:48 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] C code calling ASM functions --- David Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You

RE: [avr-gcc-list] testsuite saga continues

2008-01-30 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Andrew Hutchinson Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 3:55 PM To: Wouter van Gulik Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] testsuite saga continues gcc uses its own status

[avr-gcc-list] GCC 4.3 20080215 snapshot broken for AVR

2008-02-16 Thread Weddington, Eric
Hi All, I just filed GCC bug report #35218: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35218 GCC 4.3 20080215 snapshot is broken for the AVR. Last week's snapshot 20080208 built fine for the AVR. The issue seems to be in building the documentation, nothing AVR specific. This is important as the

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Bug35013 - Incomplete check for pm() annotation

2008-02-16 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Andrew Hutchinson Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 2:23 PM To: Wouter van Gulik; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug35013 - Incomplete check for pm() annotation

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Bug35013 - Incomplete check for pm() annotation

2008-02-16 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Andrew Hutchinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 2:47 PM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: Wouter van Gulik; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug35013 - Incomplete check for pm() annotation Thanks Eric

RE: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 4.3 20080215 snapshot broken for AVR

2008-02-16 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Paulo Marques [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 5:20 PM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 4.3 20080215 snapshot broken for AVR Quoting Weddington, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi

[avr-gcc-list] RE: tool chain buglist

2008-02-18 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Andrew Hutchinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 6:29 AM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: Paulo Marques; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: tool chain buglist Eric, can you get toolchain list updated? I can try, but I'm under some

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Function Pointers on AT90USB1287 and ATmega2561

2008-02-22 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Peter LaDow Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 9:17 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Function Pointers on AT90USB1287 and ATmega2561 Right. Though I did say

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Function Pointers on AT90USB1287 and ATmega2561

2008-02-22 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Peter LaDow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 10:45 AM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Function Pointers on AT90USB1287 and ATmega2561 Weddington, Eric wrote: It would be helpful

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Function Pointers on AT90USB1287 and ATmega2561

2008-02-22 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Stu Bell Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 11:19 AM To: Peter LaDow; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] Function Pointers on AT90USB1287 and ATmega2561 Pete wrote: My

RE: [avr-gcc-list] 32m1/c1 64m1/c1 status?

2008-03-01 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Dave N6NZ Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 10:50 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] 32m1/c1 64m1/c1 status? One can presume that those with NDA access have been getting

RE: [avr-gcc-list] 32m1/c1 64m1/c1 status?

2008-03-01 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Dave N6NZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 3:49 PM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] 32m1/c1 64m1/c1 status? Weddington, Eric wrote: Was there a particular device that you

RE: [avr-gcc-list] programmer notepad lost

2008-03-04 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Andi Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 1:27 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] programmer notepad lost Hi, I just recently installed WinAVR-20071221-install.exe, but

RE: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 4.3.0 release, a few of bugs

2008-03-08 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K. Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 6:02 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 4.3.0 release, a few of bugs Hi. GCC 4.3.0 is available to download. A few

[avr-gcc-list] RE: AVR bug fix status

2008-03-16 Thread Weddington, Eric
. Eric Weddington -Original Message- From: Andrew Hutchinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 10:06 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org; Weddington, Eric; Anatoly Sokolov Subject: AVR bug fix status Here is status of the bugs I have looked at. Bug status needs

RE: [avr-gcc-list] (no subject)

2008-03-18 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of FRANCISCO ESPINOLA Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 8:50 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] (no subject) Iam trying to built a gcc 4.3.0 target avr but I am getting

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Error: illegal opcode movw for mcu avr3

2008-03-18 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: FRANCISCO ESPINOLA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 10:10 AM To: Weddington, Eric; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] Error: illegal opcode movw for mcu avr3 Yes you right. But I do not have the patches

RE: [avr-gcc-list] cannot open shared object: No such file or

2008-03-19 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of FRANCISCO ESPINOLA Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 1:34 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] cannot open shared object: No such file or Even when I have the libmpfr.so.1

RE: [avr-gcc-list] gcc testing..

2008-03-21 Thread Weddington, Eric
Hi Neil, Thanks for doing this! Would you also be willing to send your entire test results to the gcc-testresults mailing lists: http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html Thanks! Eric Weddington -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Neil

RE: [avr-gcc-list] RE: Class Interrupts

2008-03-24 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Ron Kreymborg Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 2:28 PM To: 'Marek Michalkiewicz' Cc: 'Joerg Wunsch'; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] RE: Class Interrupts The idea was

RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc build errors

2008-03-26 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Mark Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 2:33 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc build errors Hello, I am trying to build the AVR-GCC tool chain

RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc build errors

2008-03-26 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Mark Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 2:33 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc build errors Hello, I am trying to build the AVR-GCC tool chain

RE: [avr-gcc-list] RFC: Patch for signal argument

2008-03-31 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Andy H Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 8:26 PM To: Ron Kreymborg; AVR-GCC Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] RFC: Patch for signal argument It's possible to have a target specific compilation flag

RE: [avr-gcc-list] reentrant interrupt service routine

2008-04-01 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Sven Schlender Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 10:46 AM To: AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] reentrant interrupt service routine Hi all, I just wondering if there are some

RE: [avr-gcc-list] RFC: Patch for signal argument

2008-04-01 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Ron Kreymborg Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 6:18 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] RFC: Patch for signal argument Another little gotcha is that the Atmel

[avr-gcc-list] Removal of ATmega32HVB device

2008-04-02 Thread Weddington, Eric
Hi All, Just a note to mention that Atmel has temporarily removed support for the ATmega32HVB device. The latest release of WinAVR will no longer support this device. Anatoly, Joerg, I'll take care of submitting the patches to remove support from binutils, gcc, and avr-libc. Anatoly, I will need

RE: [avr-gcc-list] RE: Internal linking path Issues WinAVR-20080402

2008-04-03 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Preston Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 9:30 AM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: avr-gcc-list; Robert Nelson Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] RE: Internal linking path Issues WinAVR-20080402 Importance: High From Cygwin bash

RE: [avr-gcc-list] RE: Internal linking path Issues WinAVR-20080402

2008-04-03 Thread Weddington, Eric
Weddington -Original Message- From: Robert Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 9:43 AM To: Preston Wilson Cc: Weddington, Eric; avr-gcc-list; Robert Nelson Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] RE: Internal linking path Issues WinAVR-20080402 Guys, Tested on one

RE: [avr-gcc-list] RE: Internal linking path Issues WinAVR-20080402

2008-04-03 Thread Weddington, Eric
Weddington -Original Message- From: Robert Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 12:58 PM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: Preston Wilson; avr-gcc-list; Robert Nelson Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] RE: Internal linking path Issues WinAVR-20080402 Hi Eric, I'm

RE: [avr-gcc-list] RE: Internal linking path Issues WinAVR-20080402

2008-04-03 Thread Weddington, Eric
subsequently been fixed). Give me 2-3 hours to re-build GCC and get it uploaded. Eric Weddington -Original Message- From: Robert Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 1:25 PM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: Preston Wilson; avr-gcc-list; Robert Nelson Subject: Re: [avr-gcc

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Add builtins in avr target.

2008-04-04 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Anatoly Sokolov Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 2:51 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] Add builtins in avr target. Hello. This patch add '__builtin_avr_swap',

RE: AW: [avr-gcc-list] reentrant interrupt service routine

2008-04-07 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Mark Litwack Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 8:23 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: AW: [avr-gcc-list] reentrant interrupt service routine I don't mean to carry on a conversation

RE: [avr-gcc-list] reentrant interrupt service routine

2008-04-07 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Bernard Fouché [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 9:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Weddington, Eric; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] reentrant interrupt service routine Malloc() and friends

RE: AW: [avr-gcc-list] reentrant interrupt service routine

2008-04-07 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Mark Litwack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 10:26 AM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: AW: [avr-gcc-list] reentrant interrupt service routine Ok, that sounds like a plan. I'll collect whatever

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Optimizer bug, again?

2008-04-08 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Erik Zane Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 5:24 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] Optimizer bug, again? I'm working on Ubuntu, and I've downloaded GCC 4.3.0 and

RE: [avr-gcc-list] ATMEGA2560 support

2008-04-08 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Dale Whitfield Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 12:06 AM To: Erik Christiansen Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] ATMEGA2560 support Hi Erik

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Odd prologue for ATmega256x in WinAVR20080407

2008-04-10 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Jeff Barlow Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 9:10 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Odd prologue for ATmega256x in WinAVR20080407 Stu Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Odd prologue for ATmega256x in WinAVR20080407

2008-04-10 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 12:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Weddington, Eric; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Odd prologue for ATmega256x in WinAVR20080407 I

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Odd prologue for ATmega256x in WinAVR20080407

2008-04-10 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 12:53 PM To: Weddington, Eric; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Odd prologue for ATmega256x in WinAVR20080407 Hey ! I

RE: [avr-gcc-list] gcc 4.3.0

2008-04-14 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Andreas Kaiser Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 1:30 PM To: Ruud Vlaming Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc 4.3.0 The WinAVR/avr-libc library appears to be compiled

[avr-gcc-list] RE: Patch Fix PR35013, PR27192

2008-04-16 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Andy H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 9:02 PM To: AVR-GCC Cc: Anatoly Sokolov; Weddington, Eric Subject: Re: Patch Fix PR35013, PR27192 3) Give up and dont permit any arithmetic. (Perhaps error or warning would still

RE: [avr-gcc-list] optimization flags causes problems??

2008-04-17 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Ramazan Kerek Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 1:16 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] optimization flags causes problems?? Hello, I have started using AT90CAN128 with

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Add builtins in avr target.

2008-04-17 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Anatoly Sokolov Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 3:44 PM To: Oleksandr Redchuk; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Add builtins in avr target. Hi. 2008/4/17, Wouter

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Add builtins in avr target.

2008-04-18 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K. Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 9:24 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Add builtins in avr target. On Friday 18 April 2008 12:56, Weddington, Eric wrote

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Latest working versions (ATmega324p)?

2008-04-18 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Rick Mann Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 10:55 AM To: avr-gcc List Subject: [avr-gcc-list] Latest working versions (ATmega324p)? Hi. Is binutils 2.18 and gcc-4.3.0 okay to build for AVR? In

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Global Memory

2008-04-19 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of John Wicking Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 6:21 PM To: Avr List Subject: [avr-gcc-list] Global Memory I am using a AT90USB1287 with code based on the HOST CDC. I have been having a

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Bug? gcc silently assumes mcu model when linking, creating bad executable

2008-04-21 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 7:21 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug? gcc silently assumes mcu model when linking,creating bad executable My

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Add builtins in avr target.

2008-04-21 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Rolf Ebert Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 10:24 AM To: Anatoly Sokolov Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Add builtins in avr target. Anatoly Sokolov schrieb: Hi.

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Bug? gcc silently assumes mcu model when linking, creating bad executable

2008-04-21 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Joerg Wunsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 10:34 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Cc: Weddington, Eric Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug? gcc silently assumes mcu model when linking,creating bad executable As Weddington, Eric

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Bug? gcc silently assumes mcu model when linking, creating bad executable

2008-04-21 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Dave N6NZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 1:38 PM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: Joerg Wunsch; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug? gcc silently assumes mcu model when linking, creating bad executable Weddington

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Latest working versions (ATmega324p)?

2008-04-24 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Rick Mann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:08 PM To: Bernard Fouché Cc: Weddington, Eric; avr-gcc List Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Latest working versions (ATmega324p)? On Apr 24, 2008, at 3:55 AM, Bernard Fouché wrote

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Latest working versions (ATmega324p)?

2008-04-25 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Graham Davies Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 5:08 AM To: avr-gcc List Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Latest working versions (ATmega324p)? Bernard Fouché wrote: ... there should be

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Latest working versions (ATmega324p)?

2008-04-25 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Bernard Fouché [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 2:48 AM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: Rick Mann; avr-gcc List Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Latest working versions (ATmega324p)? Weddington, Eric wrote: I'm currently working on a new

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Multiply improvement [1]

2008-04-27 Thread Weddington, Eric
Hi Anatoly, Thanks for the patch! Do you think that this patch is ok to put into the next WinAVR release? Eric -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Anatoly Sokolov Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 11:47 AM To: avr-GCC Subject:

RE: [avr-gcc-list] OS X 4.2.2 -- simplest way today?

2008-04-28 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Steve Franks Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 8:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] OS X 4.2.2 -- simplest way today? Dave, You could steal

RE: [avr-gcc-list] OS X 4.2.2 -- simplest way today?

2008-04-28 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Dave N6NZ Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 10:33 PM To: AVR-GCC Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] OS X 4.2.2 -- simplest way today? Well, OS X, especially the new 10.5 release has just enough

RE: [avr-gcc-list] ATmega2560 and r30/31 save in function prologue

2008-05-02 Thread Weddington, Eric
Anatoly, Andy, can you look at this? Stu, at minimum you can always submit a bug report at the WinAVR project on SourceForge. I'll take care of getting it to the right place. Eric Weddington -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of

RE: [avr-gcc-list] What has changed between WinAVR 20070525rc2andWinAVR 20080430?

2008-05-13 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Bob Paddock Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 5:48 PM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] What has changed between WinAVR 20070525rc2andWinAVR 20080430? On Monday 12 May

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >