On Apr 27, 2006, at 11:31 PM, dimax un wrote:
WOW. I will definitely study your message. It will take time to all
of us.
But my scepticism was not about templates but about writing
embedded code in C++ instead of C/Assembler/InlineAssembler.
Interesting what would you get if you would writ
WOW. I will definitely study your message. It will take time to all of us.
But my scepticism was not about templates but about writing embedded code in
C++ instead of C/Assembler/InlineAssembler. Interesting what would you get
if you would write one more example in plain good C.
I pasted some ci
WOW. I will definitely study your message. It will take time to all of us.
But my scepticism was not about templates but about writing embedded code in C++ instead of C/Assembler/InlineAssembler. Interesting what would you get if you would write one more example in plain good C.
On Apr 25, 2006, at 10:48 AM, dimax un wrote:
Never heard that C++ makes small code especially templates and
especially in embedded systems.
Actually, templates are the best hope for small code using C++.
The secret is to have the right kind of templates, and to use the
compiler to do as
Never heard that C++ makes small code especially templates and especially in embedded systems.
Micro Connection to the Macro Vision
http://www.xdimax.com
No, it just occurred to me
On Apr 23, 2006, at 2:08 PM, Anton Erasmus wrote:
On 22 Apr 2006 at 10:09, Ned Konz wrote:
On Apr 21, 2006, at 11:18 PM, Björn Haase wrote:
"Anton Erasmus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wouldn't it be worthwhile to add a method of specifying device
fuses
in the C or assembler source file