We always welcome contributions. Please raise a jira and attach your changes
as a patch.
Regards
Nandika
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 6:24 AM, slowpoison slowpoi...@comcast.net wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana
sanj...@opensource.lk wrote:
Why not get the script to run
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana
sanj...@opensource.lk wrote:
Why not get the script to run the generated code thru a pretty printer?
True. But, why add an extra step.
Besides, I have seen that running the code through pretty printer
still leaves something to be desired. For
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
Should be a matter of updating the XSLTs used for code generation.
OK, great. I'll try to see what I can add.
Also, is there interest in fixing the formatting of the generated
code? The formatting is, sorry to say, awful.
Why not get the script to run the generated code thru a pretty printer?
Sanjiva.
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 6:21 AM, slowpoison slowpoi...@comcast.net wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com
wrote:
Should be a matter of updating the XSLTs used for code
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:23 AM, slowpoison slowpoi...@comcast.net wrote:
I noticed that there is no validation for integers in the generated
code. For example if I define by integer to be of type
positiveInteger, the code won't check that it's zero.
I'm wondering if there is a way to do
I noticed that there is no validation for integers in the generated
code. For example if I define by integer to be of type
positiveInteger, the code won't check that it's zero.
I'm wondering if there is a way to do this.
If not, I'd like to know how easy/hard will it be to add it. I'm
willing to
