Hi all,
With a bit of help from Sam I got the Unity JHBuild module to cleanly
build the entire Compiz stack as well - keeping *everything* installed
and running cleanly under ~/unity/install.
This comes in very handy when fx. debugging branches requiring ABI
breaks etc (i am looking at you
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 16:44 +0800, Sam Spilsbury wrote:
Q: What do you plan to do with this in the future
A: We can probably use this as a test harness for the new stacking code
to compare what's on the server with what the stacking code thinks the
stack is to nip any problems in the bud.
S. Christian Collins s.chriscoll...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/05/2011 07:47 AM, Christian Rupp wrote:
This is a good thing, but will this programs and others be updated to
the newest version or have we still to wait half a year for the next
version of ubuntu?
I usually want to have only
Thank you for your comments! I too hope the design team will consider
this for 12.04, even if it's not accepted as it is...
@Stefanos
I know what you're saying about the maximized-window control buttons,
and the problem is partly because they're hidden when cursor is not on
top panel. I cannot
Oops, I have to correct myself with the last part there:
PS: Note that it seems like the mockup for autohide Launcher and
un-maximized window seems to be missing but the proposed behavior is
exactly like the proposed behavior here:
http://i54.tinypic.com/qzm2l0.png So, essentially, the
I'm with James on this one. It would be nice to have a definition of
what an Ubuntu application is, but let's face it - that would drive a
wedge in the wider community even wider than what currently exists.
People would label Canonical as Apple and us users as fanboys, and
essentially seek
Hi all,
this morning I had an idea about the Unity dash. I didn't prepare any
mockups, because it's not an idea about how it is designed but how it
could appear.
Actually the user press the Super button and the dash window
appears, covering/shadowing what is below it.
My idea is to make it
I don't think it would drive the community apart at all. In fact, this would
most likely promote key apps that fit best within Ubuntu, and by doing so,
would increase the competition for better apps across the whole of the
ecosystem. As someone who is more visual than code oriented, I can easily
I think this icon is meant to replace the desktop icon, in which case a
down arrow wouldn't be needed.
On 06/09/11 06:41, Ian Santopietro wrote:
Those do look nice. The only thing I would change would be to show a
down-arrow pointing to a line, to indicate a download.
On Sep 5, 2011 11:36
Its interesting that there are 2 different opinions on this.
I think that how it is managed will be the definitive factor on whether
it drive the community apart or not. If there is an Ubuntu 'team' that
would apply themes, Unity and panel integration etc, then it should be
ok as long as bugs
I agree that there's a small problem with users installing gobs of KDE
dependencies that they might not want (without even knowing that they
don't want them). But good looks is so subjective as to make any
attempt to define it in any formal way very problematic.
1) Maybe it would be wise to give
You misunderstand: I do not propose a good looks badge. I am proposing a
standards compliance badge.
As for your (1), I would not argue against a soft warning.
As for (2) Then let us not speak of it here ;)
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:46 PM, topdownjimmy topdownji...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree
What in addition to being GTK-based would you propose as a requirement
for being standards-compliant?
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Jonathan Meek shrouded.cl...@gmail.com wrote:
You misunderstand: I do not propose a good looks badge. I am proposing a
standards compliance badge.
As for your
That is what the former half of the original post is about. Those guidelines
for what this hypothetical standards-compliance do not quite exist yet.
Before we worry about singling out ANY applications, we have to figure out
what exactly that application would entail, no?
With that in mind, we
True and an excellent point. I'm not saying this is for all developers. But
for those who what to create that... *experience* for others, this will be
the thing for them to go by.
As for fragmentation. There's no real-- I don't see it as an issue
(personally). Because, the guidelines will
Maybe this should strictly be the set of applications that gets
installed-by-default, or included-on-the-cd/dvd? These would typically
constitute the Ubuntu experience, right?
Maybe it's everything in main, and not in restricted/universe/multiverse?
Further, maybe anything that's not part of the
How about putting the U with the downward arrow
(http://ubuntuone.com/30SgZIkoCLbxKWGhS2CUpY) on the side of the bag?
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Ian Santopietro isan...@gmail.com wrote:
I see, thanks for pointing that out.
Going on that theme, many people recognise that a down arrow
2011/9/6 Eylem Koca eylemk...@gmail.com:
How about putting the U with the downward arrow
(http://ubuntuone.com/30SgZIkoCLbxKWGhS2CUpY) on the side of the bag?
Don't. Please.
I pointed an alternative to show that it is possible to come up with
something different than a shopping bag in a simple,
Jeremy Nickurak jer...@nickurak.ca wrote:
Maybe this should strictly be the set of applications that gets
installed-by-default, or included-on-the-cd/dvd? These would typically
constitute the Ubuntu experience, right?
Maybe it's everything in main, and not in
restricted/universe/multiverse?
I don't think people necessarily associate shopping bags with paid apps.
People using Android (Which uses a bag as it's icon) tend to get more free
apps than paid ones. They still use the Market icon, which looks like a
shopping bag. I very rarely see any Android users opening up the browser to
go
First: who is people? You need to define an audience.
Do you assume that newcomers are people who come from Android phones
to a desktop OS?
If Ubuntu's audience is computer literate people with smartphones and
previous experience with appstores that use a shopping bag as an icon,
then great. We're
Javier Jardón has proposed merging lp:~jjardon/indicator-datetime/optimizations
into lp:indicator-datetime.
Requested reviews:
Indicator Applet Developers (indicator-applet-developers)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~jjardon/indicator-datetime/optimizations/+merge/74210
--
Javier Jardón has proposed merging lp:~jjardon/indicator-datetime/checkforpow
into lp:indicator-datetime.
Requested reviews:
Indicator Applet Developers (indicator-applet-developers)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~jjardon/indicator-datetime/checkforpow/+merge/74224
--
Javier Jardón has proposed merging
lp:~jjardon/indicator-datetime/remove_death_code into lp:indicator-datetime.
Requested reviews:
Indicator Applet Developers (indicator-applet-developers)
For more details, see:
Conor Curran has proposed merging
lp:~cjcurran/indicator-session/hide-user-menu-via-gsettings-key into
lp:indicator-session.
Requested reviews:
Ted Gould (ted)
Related bugs:
Bug #834137 in Session Menu: user menu says [Invalid UTF-8]
Review: Approve
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~cjcurran/indicator-session/hide-user-menu-via-gsettings-key/+merge/74262
Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:indicator-session.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits
The proposal to merge
lp:~cjcurran/indicator-session/hide-user-menu-via-gsettings-key into
lp:indicator-session has been updated.
Status: Needs review = Approved
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~cjcurran/indicator-session/hide-user-menu-via-gsettings-key/+merge/74262
--
The proposal to merge
lp:~cjcurran/indicator-session/hide-user-menu-via-gsettings-key into
lp:indicator-session has been updated.
Status: Approved = Merged
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~cjcurran/indicator-session/hide-user-menu-via-gsettings-key/+merge/74262
--
Review: Approve
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~cjcurran/indicator-session/null-error-user-dbus-mgr/+merge/74080
Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:indicator-session.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits
Post to
The proposal to merge lp:~cjcurran/indicator-session/null-error-user-dbus-mgr
into lp:indicator-session has been updated.
Status: Needs review = Approved
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~cjcurran/indicator-session/null-error-user-dbus-mgr/+merge/74080
--
The proposal to merge lp:~jjardon/indicator-datetime/checkforpow into
lp:indicator-datetime has been updated.
Status: Needs review = Approved
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~jjardon/indicator-datetime/checkforpow/+merge/74224
--
Review: Approve
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~jjardon/indicator-datetime/checkforpow/+merge/74224
Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:indicator-datetime.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits
Post to :
The proposal to merge lp:~jjardon/indicator-datetime/remove_death_code into
lp:indicator-datetime has been updated.
Status: Needs review = Approved
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~jjardon/indicator-datetime/remove_death_code/+merge/74227
--
Review: Approve
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~jjardon/indicator-datetime/remove_death_code/+merge/74227
Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:indicator-datetime.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits
Post to :
Review: Approve
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~jjardon/indicator-datetime/optimizations/+merge/74210
Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:indicator-datetime.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits
Post to :
The proposal to merge lp:~jjardon/indicator-datetime/optimizations into
lp:indicator-datetime has been updated.
Status: Needs review = Approved
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~jjardon/indicator-datetime/optimizations/+merge/74210
--
Review: Needs Information
It seems that the wall-clock isn't in 3.1.91 which is what is in Oneiric:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/oneiric/amd64/libgnome-desktop-3-dev/filelist
So that would mean the pkgconfig check is wrong there.
Also, I'm a little uncomfortable using a schema that isn't in our
The proposal to merge lp:~jjardon/indicator-datetime/remove_death_code into
lp:indicator-datetime has been updated.
Status: Approved = Merged
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~jjardon/indicator-datetime/remove_death_code/+merge/74227
--
The proposal to merge lp:~jjardon/indicator-datetime/checkforpow into
lp:indicator-datetime has been updated.
Status: Approved = Merged
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~jjardon/indicator-datetime/checkforpow/+merge/74224
--
The proposal to merge lp:~jjardon/indicator-datetime/optimizations into
lp:indicator-datetime has been updated.
Status: Approved = Merged
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~jjardon/indicator-datetime/optimizations/+merge/74210
--
It seems that the wall-clock isn't in 3.1.91 which is what is in Oneiric:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/oneiric/amd64/libgnome-desktop-3-dev/filelist
So that would mean the pkgconfig check is wrong there.
It's : http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-desktop/tree/libgnome-desktop?id=3.1.91
Should
The proposal to merge lp:~sargentd/libindicate/opional-mono into lp:libindicate
has been updated.
Status: Needs review = Approved
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~sargentd/libindicate/opional-mono/+merge/73989
--
Review: Approve
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~sargentd/libindicate/opional-mono/+merge/73989
Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:libindicate.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits
Post to :
The proposal to merge lp:~sargentd/libindicate/opional-mono into lp:libindicate
has been updated.
Status: Approved = Merged
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~sargentd/libindicate/opional-mono/+merge/73989
--
No currently a new enough version of GLib in Oneiric to test. Need to circle
back when that gets updated.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~jjardon/indicator-datetime/fix-775113/+merge/73846
Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:indicator-datetime.
45 matches
Mail list logo
