Re: [Babel-users] Some notes on seqno requests in Babel

2017-10-29 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 04:48:25PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > > IMHO for uninformed person the RFC6126bis version of that section is > > even harder to understand properly than one form RFC6126. > > Ondrej, you need to give me more information. I've been staring at this > document for so

Re: [Babel-users] Some notes on seqno requests in Babel

2017-10-29 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 03:22:19AM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > Dear Ondrej, > > I think that RFC6126bis answers all of your comments except this one: Hi Thanks for all your answers. The first comment is clear. The second one, well, once one knows what to expect then one would understand

Re: [Babel-users] Babel in Bird

2016-05-11 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 03:02:55PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > What you describe is perfectly correct. > > > I have two questions w.r.t. this sequence of events: > > > 1) How is router restart and seqnos supposed to be handled without > > waiting for route timeout? > > It's worse than

Re: [Babel-users] Babel in Bird

2016-05-11 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 03:04:21PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > > Well, section 2.8 (and in more detail section 3.5.5) specifies that we > > should keep unreachable entries, but IMHO it does not specify that the > > old route is considered selected/installed for a purpose of conditions in >

Re: [Babel-users] Babel in Bird

2016-05-02 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 03:59:35PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Ondrej Zajicek <santi...@crfreenet.org> writes: > > > I have two questions w.r.t. this sequence of events: > > > > 1) How is router restart and seqnos supposed to be handled without

Re: [Babel-users] Version 1.6.0

2016-05-01 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:32:58PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Ondrej Zajicek <santi...@crfreenet.org> writes: > > > - in some cases (e.g. babel_handle_route_request()), check for plen == 0 > >or check if prefix is IPA_NONE is used where check for AE

Re: [Babel-users] Babel in Bird 1.6.0

2016-04-30 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 03:15:52PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Baptiste Jonglez writes: > > While I'm not sure what the purpose of this is (a null update with a > null router ID with infinity metric and interval?) it *is* technically > in spec. I think the

Re: [Babel-users] [PATCH] Add the Babel routing protocol to Bird

2015-09-09 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:10:34PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > This adds the Babel routing protocol (RFC6126) to Bird. It is a complete > implementation of the IPv6 subset of RFC6126, but does not implement any > of the extensions. Thanks, i will review the patch ASAP. > Compared to