Re: [Babel-users] babels bug with uninitialized data somewhere?

2014-06-27 Thread Dave Taht
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr wrote: There's nothing obviously wrong. Here's an example of a source-specific TLV (the one at time 06:20.362230 in the wifi capture): So this does imply some sort of memory corruption issue on parsing that

[Babel-users] Babel in Dave's network [was: babels bug with uninitialized data...]

2014-06-27 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
I turn it off (it has a noisy fan) and for sane values of boom, the whole network switches over to going through the wan or adhoc ports. You appear to be running with a very high hello interval, It usually seems much faster than that... but I'll go measure. I am using the default hello

Re: [Babel-users] babels bug with uninitialized data somewhere?

2014-06-27 Thread Dave Taht
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr wrote: There's nothing obviously wrong. Here's an example of a source-specific TLV (the one at time 06:20.362230 in the wifi capture): So this does imply some sort of memory corruption issue on parsing that

Re: [Babel-users] babels bug with uninitialized data somewhere?

2014-06-27 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
I'm sure Dave can deal with our dirty rebasing habit. There is one other major user of babels over on homewrt I know of that would be surprised if you rebased without warning. We're not rebasing the babeld trunk. We have a private branch that we intend to merge, and that branch is being

Re: [Babel-users] babels bug with uninitialized data somewhere?

2014-06-27 Thread Dave Taht
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr wrote: I'm sure Dave can deal with our dirty rebasing habit. There is one other major user of babels over on homewrt I know of that would be surprised if you rebased without warning. We're not rebasing the