Re: [Babel-users] babel on an otherwise transparent bridge
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Juliusz Chroboczekwrote: >> like it to do is have a dedicated ipv6 ULA ip address for management >> purposes (not using a vlan here), and announce that to the network, but >> never offer itself as a routing opportunity to anything > > [...] > >> out br-lan something deny? >> in? >> inflate the metric? > > out br-lan ula/128 allow > out deny It's nice to know that both of us can struggle with babel syntax. The first line there doesn't parse. Should it? out ip fd42:a3d6:5621::1/128 allow out deny Parses. the route appears elsewhere, it doesn't show up as a router, but the box is unpingable via ipv6. -- Dave Täht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! http://blog.cerowrt.org ___ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
Re: [Babel-users] alternate source specific encoding?
>>> is that in a branch somewhere yet? >> No, sorry. > Got an ETA? Dave, it's September. Do you imagine what September looks like at university? > I'm in the process of rebuilding the yurtlab, Lucky man. I am in the process of grading undergrad internships. -- Juliusz ___ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
Re: [Babel-users] babel on an otherwise transparent bridge
> like it to do is have a dedicated ipv6 ULA ip address for management > purposes (not using a vlan here), and announce that to the network, but > never offer itself as a routing opportunity to anything [...] > out br-lan something deny? > in? > inflate the metric? out br-lan ula/128 allow out deny ___ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
[Babel-users] babel on an otherwise transparent bridge
I have a box setup to be a transparent wifi/ethernet bridge. What I'd like it to do is have a dedicated ipv6 ULA ip address for management purposes (not using a vlan here), and announce that to the network, but never offer itself as a routing opportunity to anything on any side of the bridge, except for stuff trying to get to that specific IP. It also needs to have a route table internally to get around the network (snmp). If I just blithely leave babel at the defaults, new devices on the bridge tend to get routes from it, first, leading to a 30-60 second period where those devices can (and do) choose that 2 hop route rather than the "1 hop" one. out br-lan something deny? in? inflate the metric? -- Dave Täht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! http://blog.cerowrt.org ___ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users