Le 27 juin 2014 à 20:39, Juliusz Chroboczek a écrit :
the two captures are at: http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/babcap/
There's nothing obviously wrong. Here's an example of a source-specific
TLV (the one at time 06:20.362230 in the wifi capture):
0d 16 02 20 00 00 06 40 65 8a
what about putting the latest version in the public git?
Done. (forced update)
Matthieu
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
SS-Update/src-prefix ::/0 from 2001:470:8236:261::/64 metric 224 seqno
25993 interval 160.0s
SS-Update/prefix ::/0 from ::/128 metric 224 seqno 25993 interval 160.0s
Ah, there's an SS-aware version of tcpdump? Cool. Where do I get a copy?
-- Juliusz
Ah, there's an SS-aware version of tcpdump? Cool. Where do I get a copy?
On *your* web page !
http://git.wifi.pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr/?p=tcpdump-babels.git;a=summary
Matthieu
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek
j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr wrote:
There's nothing obviously wrong. Here's an example of a source-specific
TLV (the one at time 06:20.362230 in the wifi capture):
So this does imply some sort of memory corruption issue on parsing
that
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek
j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr wrote:
There's nothing obviously wrong. Here's an example of a source-specific
TLV (the one at time 06:20.362230 in the wifi capture):
So this does imply some sort of memory corruption issue on parsing
that
I'm sure Dave can deal with our dirty rebasing habit.
There is one other major user of babels over on homewrt I know of that
would be surprised if you rebased without warning.
We're not rebasing the babeld trunk. We have a private branch that we
intend to merge, and that branch is being
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek
j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr wrote:
I'm sure Dave can deal with our dirty rebasing habit.
There is one other major user of babels over on homewrt I know of that
would be surprised if you rebased without warning.
We're not rebasing the
8 matches
Mail list logo