Re: [Babel-users] babel export routes from bird to routing table?

2017-01-02 Thread Christof Schulze
Hello Juliusz, At a later stage I would like to announce different default-routes at different places in the mesh network. Why? I am working on integrating babel into gluon, which is a framework for building freifunk-firmwares. Freifunk is a project where large, mostly wifi, mesh networks are

Re: [Babel-users] babel export routes from bird to routing table?

2017-01-02 Thread Benjamin Henrion
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Christof Schulze wrote: > Hello Juliusz, > >>> At a later stage I would like to announce different default-routes at >>> different places in the mesh network. >> >> Why? > > I am working on integrating babel into gluon, which is a

Re: [Babel-users] [babel] some thoughts towards babel-1.9

2017-01-02 Thread Dave Taht
I added a todo list for my "rabel" branch of babel covering some of the stuff I'd like to try. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dtaht/rabeld/master/todo.org ___ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: [Babel-users] some thoughts towards babel-1.9

2017-01-02 Thread Dave Taht
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 6:28 AM, Benjamin Henrion wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Dave Taht wrote: >> I've long been testing a few out of tree patches for babel and long >> have had the intent to try a few more once the first phase of the >>

Re: [Babel-users] some thoughts towards babel-1.9

2017-01-02 Thread Dave Taht
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >> For the wired link case, I am surprised babel considers it "interfering"! > > It doesn't. > > https://github.com/jech/babeld/blob/master/interface.c#L210 If that is the only error in two highly speculative documents

Re: [Babel-users] some thoughts towards babel-1.9

2017-01-02 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
> If that is the only error in two highly speculative documents then I'm > winning. :) You'll be helpful (I prefer this to "winning") when you implement some of your ideas and provide us with hard data to show that they are useful. (For the record, CS6 and unicast IHU have both been implemented,

Re: [Babel-users] some thoughts towards babel-1.9

2017-01-02 Thread Benjamin Henrion
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > I've long been testing a few out of tree patches for babel and long > have had the intent to try a few more once the first phase of the > make-wifi-fast work was completed - which it mostly is, so far as lede > is concerned