www.tvplanner.co.uk - or www.uknetguide.co.uk/TV/
Cheers,
Rich.
On 3/29/07, Angelo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not even Safari compliant, yet. Does anyone have a better
alternative with Freeview listings?
On 29/03/07, John Wesley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/03/07, Richard Lockwood
On 3/30/07, Angelo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not even Safari compliant, yet. Does anyone have a better
alternative with Freeview listings?
http://www.mightyv.com/ which has even won a backstage competition, IIRC.
--
cheers,
Jakob.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To
Andy wrote:
I can see how it got Netscape, FireFox is derived from the Netscape
code base, but how it got from the word Linux into the word Mac I
don't know. And this was for a user agent that was stating it's OS as
Linux.
Simple - Not Windows probably means Mac OS. In a tiny amount of cases
I think that it depends on what your demographic is. If you are
talking about people who barely know how to switch on a computer,
then you are going to get windows users. For people who actually use
a computer for what it is intended, then, for instance in the
scientific community, 50%
For
people who actually use a computer for what it is intended,
Wow. That's quite some statement.
I'd compose an elegant riposte if I didn't have to go off to IKEA post
haste, because I've just noticed on their website that the chair and
desk I want to set up my desktop PC is in, and I
At 10:00 +0100 30/3/07, Jason Cartwright wrote:
bbc.co.uk uses ActiveX
Where?
Hm, my mistake it was on a BBC site but not under the bbc.co.uk
domain, I could look for other examples on bbc.co.uk but for now this
will suffice.
On 29/03/07, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even 10% is significantly higher than 0.4%
I was using 10% as an upper limit. If the true value was over 5% I
would not be surprised. The next round number above 5% is 10% and over
that would surprise me.
No - this is not evidence.
On 3/30/07, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/03/07, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even 10% is significantly higher than 0.4%
I was using 10% as an upper limit. If the true value was over 5% I
would not be surprised. The next round number above 5% is 10% and over
that would
Oh and before I go you used the term significant portion, how many
would be considered significant?
No, I didn't. I used the phrase significant PROportion. I believe
Significant Portion is either a pub rock band from Kings Lynn, or
some kind of euphemism.
Less frivolously, you stated that
Matthew Lamont wrote:
I think that it depends on what your demographic is. If you are talking
about people who barely know how to switch on a computer, then you are
going to get windows users. For people who actually use a computer for
what it is intended, then, for instance in the
I'd take issue with that sweeping stateent - pretty much all of my student
friends have laptops, some have both. I live in a house with five other
people - in total there's three mac users and three windows users. Me, I'm a
Windows expert, one of my housemates is a Mac expert. The other three are
11 matches
Mail list logo
