On 24/07/07, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, to summarise; we couldn't implement the player on all popular
platforms then (which we realise is a problem), but we are working to
do it now, and we'll get the system out to the majority of users now,
hitting our initial target launch
BBC staff/execs
have talked about on the list many many times.
We really don't mind talking about this...
thanks
Jem
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of vijay chopra
Sent: Tue 7/24/2007 7:37 PM
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Over 10,000 sign BBC
At 08:45 +0100 25/7/07, vijay chopra wrote:
On 24/07/07, Richard Lockwood
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So, to summarise; we couldn't implement the player on all popular
platforms then (which we realise is a problem), but we are working to
do it now, and we'll get the
On 25/07/07, Jeremy Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We really don't mind talking about this...
thanks
Jem
I know that you guys don't mind talking Jem; the intent of my FOI request
was to get full, detailed *documentation* behind many of the important
decisions behind iPlayer.
I have to say
You won't get anything, the FOI Act makes provision for the witholding of
documentation relating to commercial negotiations.
On 25/07/07, vijay chopra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25/07/07, Jeremy Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We really don't mind talking about this...
thanks
Jem
On 25/07/07, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You won't get anything, the FOI Act makes provision for the witholding of
documentation relating to commercial negotiations.
The whole point of the BBC is that it's not a commercial entity (at least
domestically). Besides, if I don't
] Over 10,000 sign BBC iplayer petition
On 25/07/07, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You won't get anything, the FOI Act makes provision for the witholding of
documentation relating to commercial negotiations.
The whole point of the BBC is that it's not a commercial entity (at least
The whole point of the BBC is that it's not a commercial entity (at
least domestically)
Although it would find it mighty hard to put anything on the screen if
it didn't have confidential commercial negotiations with the companies
who rent buildings, make cameras, do transmission, provide
At 13:04 +0100 25/7/07, vijay chopra wrote:
On 25/07/07, Jeremy Stone
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We really don't mind talking about this...
thanks
Jem
I know that you guys don't mind talking Jem; the intent of my FOI
request was to get full, detailed *documentation*
Gosh. And let's say there are, as a round figure, ten million
computers in homes across the country. So that's, let's see, 0.1% of
computer users (assuming just one person uses each computer) who are
bothered. Hardly a groundswell of public opinion, is it? More people
than that vote for the
On 24/07/07, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More seriously, if there's no announcement about (at the least) a
release date for a version for Mac by the end of the year, they may
have a point, but at the moment I still say the BBC are doing
absolutely the right thing, given the
OK. You've picked and chosen what you see as relevent. Let's read the rest.
At the time, the only two solutions deployed at scale on the internet
were Microsoft's DRM, and Apple's Fairplay DRM. Fairplay did not
include the ability to expire content, and therefore could not meet
the minimum
12 matches
Mail list logo
