Re: [BackupPC-devel] BackupPC_Admin C wrapper and apache hell

2017-03-22 Thread Kenneth Porter
On 3/22/2017 5:37 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > No, pretty sure that's not the case. There is a straightforward error > in apache's error_log saying it's not allowing access due to the > configuration and when I use a Directory directive to allow access to > /usr/sbin it works, but I don't want to

Re: [BackupPC-devel] BackupPC_Admin C wrapper and apache hell

2017-03-21 Thread Les Mikesell
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: >> >> > The problem is that a compiled binary doesn't belong in /usr/share/... >> > (although that's where the current package put it) so I have migrated it >> > to /usr/sbin/BackupPC_Admin. >> >> Would it make more sense

Re: [BackupPC-devel] BackupPC_Admin C wrapper and apache hell

2017-03-21 Thread Juergen Harms
The Mageia BackupPC 3 package puts BackupPC_Admin (the suid executable) into /var//backuppc/, next to BackupPC_Admin.cgi - and Apache does not complain. Normally Mageia is configured along the same lines as Fedora. Could this be a viable alternative for BackupPC 4? Juergen

Re: [BackupPC-devel] BackupPC_Admin C wrapper and apache hell

2017-03-21 Thread Richard Shaw
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 9:36 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote: > --On Sunday, March 19, 2017 6:41 PM -0500 Richard Shaw > wrote: > > > The problem is that a compiled binary doesn't belong in /usr/share/... > > (although that's where the current package put