Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

I think users got the idea we are moving again, by now. I think we should stop clogging the users ML, which should be reserved to help users. Please move to the devel list, or, better, open a issue on github and continue discussion there with whoever is interested to setting up a nice CI / AT.

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Anyone have any thoughts about using buildbot? http://buildbot.net/ Looks like a pretty straightforward CI and testing tool that also integrates with github. This would seem to be a good tool for local testing of backuppc functionality with various xfer methods after the build. -Rich

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Hey Les, Travis-CI is just the integration point, it runs in the cloud, not on a client machine. The actual tests would be some perl testing framework, whatever is chosen, and those tests could be launched locally by the developers as well. Ideally the test-running would be built into the code

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Hi, On 18/05/16 18:50, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Richard Alloway wrote: >> I do have some lab resources available to me for standing up and tearing >> down VMs of various OS flavors. >> The resources are not limitless, but more than I have on my

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:58 AM, David Cramblett wrote: > Another options is travis-ci which has great integration with GitHub. > Basicly we can configure the project so that when a user makes a pull > request (submits a patch), tests are run automatically. Every

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Another options is travis-ci which has great integration with GitHub. Basicly we can configure the project so that when a user makes a pull request (submits a patch), tests are run automatically. Every person (not just admins) can see right on the pull request page if the tests passed or failed.

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Richard Alloway wrote: > I do have some lab resources available to me for standing up and tearing > down VMs of various OS flavors. > The resources are not limitless, but more than I have on my personal > machines. > > We've been using puppet

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

I haven't encountered this particular IP requirement before. I am located in the US and will inquire about the explicit transfer of copyright with my management. I'd be happy to give patch reviewing a shot. If I get approval to do this through work, I can try to set aside time each week for

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

I do have some lab resources available to me for standing up and tearing down VMs of various OS flavors. The resources are not limitless, but more than I have on my personal machines. We've been using puppet and ansible for some of our internal test automation. One or both may be candidates for

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Thanks for the offer Richard, we are getting organized, but it seems positive we are moving to github (see: https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc). comments below. Il 18/05/2016 17:01, Richard Alloway ha scritto: > I have the following available: > > 1) Perl programming > 2) C programming > 4)

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Richard Alloway wrote: > I have the following available: > > 1) Perl programming > 2) C programming > 4) Git/CVS/Development skills > > If I can get approval to do any of this on work's dime (which I think I can > do, since contributing to

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

I have the following available: 1) Perl programming 2) C programming 4) Git/CVS/Development skills If I can get approval to do any of this on work's dime (which I think I can do, since contributing to Open Source projects is part of my job), I should be able to get a little of 5: 5) Time Is

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On 16/05/16 20:39, Norm Legare wrote: > Where/when/who/how does the regression testing get done for this project? We have no CI set up yet. Maybe Travis could work. I'm not sure we even have a test suite. We should work on that, definitely. -- Best regards, Lars Tobias

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On 05/16 07:41 , Mauro Condarelli wrote: > Please see:https://danielmiessler.com/study/git/ That's a really good link. Thank you. -- Carl Soderstrom Systems Administrator Real-Time Enterprises www.real-time.com --

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 Norm Legare wrote: > Can I assume that github is very similar to Clearcase? Git is not equal to Github, as Github is a web site that is hosting projects using Git, while Git is the actual version control system. I guess one of the bigg

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 Hi Norm, comments inline. Il 16/05/2016 18:46, Norm Legare ha scritto: > Can I assume that github is very similar to Clearcase? > Not really. Github is built around git, which is philosophically different from Clearcase

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Norm Legare wrote: > Can I assume that github is very similar to Clearcase? Git is not equal to Github, as Github is a web site that is hosting projects using Git, while Git is the actual version control system. I guess one of the biggest differences with clearcase is that git is a distributed

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Hi Norm, comments inline. Il 16/05/2016 18:46, Norm Legare ha scritto: > Can I assume that github is very similar to Clearcase? > Not really. Github is built around git, which is philosophically different from Clearcase, even if there are some similarities. Please

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Can I assume that github is very similar to Clearcase? From: Kris Lou Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 12:32 PM To: General list for user discussion, questions and support Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 I'm glad to see this get off the ground -- with no disrespect to the great

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

I'm glad to see this get off the ground -- with no disrespect to the great work that Craig has done over the years. Just a couple more suggestions (and I'm sure this list will grow as the project does): * It might be worth contacting and inviting the individual maintainers of the primary

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On 05/16 10:50 , Adam Goryachev wrote: > I would definitely suggest that the lack of FTP backup support in v4 is > a non-issue. I have to agree. After 10+ years of using BPC I've not found many situations where it would be really useful. Better to get other functionality out sooner. As Voltaire

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Hi, I've trawled through my inbox, and submitted a few issues that I was able to find. Right now, I would suggest the highest priority issues are 1 and 4. If you are knowledgeable with C, then please take a look at issue 1, I suspect this could be as simple as an uninitialised variable/etc,

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On 2016-05-16 07:50 AM, Adam Goryachev wrote: > > On 16/05/2016 22:05, Stephen Joyce wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Thanks to Lars and Mauro. It's great that you've taken this on. >> >> FWIW, I contacted Craig directly last week and received a reply over >> the weekend. It sounds like he's quite busy, and

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On 16/05/16 15:33, Adam Goryachev wrote: > Ideally, anyone can submit a patch > Ideally, any "approved" person can commit a patch, as long as it isn't > their own > > Could that be done? Yes, this is done using Pull Requests. The process is described in this article:

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On 16/05/16 14:56, Juergen Harms wrote: > Username: I dont remember (-, sorry - found the confirmation mail when I > first joined the list in 2008, but that has no reference to a user name > I used at that time. > > My email address is juergen.ha...@unige.ch - in the past I normally used >

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On 16/05/2016 23:06, Alexander Moisseev wrote: > On 16.05.2016 15:50, Adam Goryachev wrote: >> Finally, I've created a github account for myself, I can't promise to do >> much, but if I can at least have the ability to submit patches, then I'd >> appreciate it. Having never worked with github

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Chime in for encouragement. Great to see this picking up such momentum. It was time. On 05/15/2016 11:15 AM, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote: > On 05/14 05:53 , Ib H. Rasmussen wrote: >> Although I'm not a contributor, and I don't think i'm cabable of being >> one, I have been using BackupPC for

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On 16.05.2016 15:50, Adam Goryachev wrote: > > Finally, I've created a github account for myself, I can't promise to do > much, but if I can at least have the ability to submit patches, then I'd > appreciate it. Having never worked with github before (other than > checking out code to use), is

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Thanks Lars. Il 16/05/2016 13:35, Lars Tobias Skjong-Børsting ha scritto: > On 16/05/16 13:23, Mauro Condarelli wrote: >> My current plans are: >> >> 1) bring github up to date. > I have now finished bringing it up to date and have published it on github: > > https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Hi Stephen, comments inline below. Il 16/05/2016 14:05, Stephen Joyce ha scritto: > Hi, > > Thanks to Lars and Mauro. It's great that you've taken this on. > > FWIW, I contacted Craig directly last week and received a reply over the > weekend. It sounds like he's quite busy, and does not

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On 05/16/2016 01:35 PM, Lars Tobias Skjong-Børsting wrote: > Please post your username if you would like to join in. Yes, please put me on the list. I had mentioned areas of technical skills - I should add that I also have experience in proposing, running and reviewing projects and motivating

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On 16/05/2016 22:05, Stephen Joyce wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks to Lars and Mauro. It's great that you've taken this on. > > FWIW, I contacted Craig directly last week and received a reply over > the weekend. It sounds like he's quite busy, and does not regularly > read these lists, but he still

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Hi, Thanks to Lars and Mauro. It's great that you've taken this on. FWIW, I contacted Craig directly last week and received a reply over the weekend. It sounds like he's quite busy, and does not regularly read these lists, but he still hopes to be able to contribute more in the future (ie,

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On 16/05/16 13:23, Mauro Condarelli wrote: > My current plans are: > > 1) bring github up to date. I have now finished bringing it up to date and have published it on github: https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc-xs https://github.com/backuppc/rsync-bpc > 4)

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Il 16/05/2016 12:21, Juergen Harms ha scritto: > Things appear to shape up nicely, there are positive replies to many of > the pending issues. Given the response of Lars - thanks - my biggest > preoccupation has gone away: contact with Craig would still be nice, but > is not essential any more,

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

> -Original Message- > From: Juergen Harms [mailto:juergen.ha...@unige.ch] > Sent: den 16 maj 2016 12:22 > To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 > > Things appear to shape up nicely, there are pos

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Things appear to shape up nicely, there are positive replies to many of the pending issues. Given the response of Lars - thanks - my biggest preoccupation has gone away: contact with Craig would still be nice, but is not essential any more, and between Mauro and Lars there are now two persons

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Hi Adam, comments inline Il 16/05/2016 01:43, Adam Goryachev ha scritto: > I had intentions of trying to pick up the project and start fixing Welcome on board! > 1) Send the email to Craig, and expect that no reply will be received. I am waiting for a usable address for that; I strongly doubt

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

> -Original Message- > From: Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom [mailto:chr...@real-time.com] > Sent: den 15 maj 2016 17:16 > To: General list for user discussion, questions and support us...@lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 > &g

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

> -Original Message- > From: Mauro Condarelli [mailto:mc5...@mclink.it] > Sent: den 14 maj 2016 13:13 > To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 > > > Concerning what I can contribute: I am 19 years beyond t

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

It’s going to be hard to find all 5 in one person. I have 1, 2, and 4, which I suspect is the combination most of us possess. 5 is in terribly short supply for a lot of us too, so someone with 3 in particular, who can organize the efforts of many people who could contribute small bits of work

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

I had intentions of trying to pick up the project and start fixing bugs/etc, but swiftly reached the end of my C programming experience, and then time. I honestly think it might be near impossible to find anyone to lead the project that has all the needed assets: 1) Perl programming 2) C

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On 05/15 11:29 , Mauro Condarelli wrote: > if anyone has (or finds) a reasonably recent address please share. > I can be reached directly at mc5...@mclink.it and I am on Freenode/#backuppc, I remember getting personal mail from him many years ago, but I can't find the archives of thos messages.

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

I’ve been using BackupPC for many years and would really hate to see it die. It’s the best solution I’ve found in a very long time. If we can encourage Craig to pick it up, or pick it up and run with it ourselves, or both (help Craig with it), whatever keeps this excellent tool alive and

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Il 15/05/2016 16:14, Les Mikesell ha scritto: > On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 5:23 AM, Raoul Bhatia wrote: >> Second, maybe we have some Googlers lurking on this list who might know >> a better way to reach out to Craig? > Yes, it looks like Google might be keeping him busy these

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

> On 15 May 2016, at 17:15, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom > wrote: > > On 05/14 05:53 , Ib H. Rasmussen wrote: >> Although I'm not a contributor, and I don't think i'm cabable of being >> one, I have been using BackupPC for more than 10 years, and i'm >> absolutely for this

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On 05/14 05:53 , Ib H. Rasmussen wrote: > Although I'm not a contributor, and I don't think i'm cabable of being > one, I have been using BackupPC for more than 10 years, and i'm > absolutely for this initiative and i'm looking forward to the success of it. Same here. -- Carl Soderstrom

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 5:23 AM, Raoul Bhatia wrote: > > Second, maybe we have some Googlers lurking on this list who might know > a better way to reach out to Craig? Yes, it looks like Google might be keeping him busy these days:

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On 15.05.2016 11:29, Mauro Condarelli wrote: > Il 14/05/2016 22:19, Juergen Harms ha scritto: >> On 05/14/2016 07:36 PM, Mauro Condarelli wrote: It's not hijacking, it's a fork and there are good reasons for that. Don't you think it might be a good idea to change the project name then

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Il 14/05/2016 22:19, Juergen Harms ha scritto: > On 05/14/2016 07:36 PM, Mauro Condarelli wrote: >>> It's not hijacking, it's a fork and there are good reasons for that. Don't >>> you think it might be a good idea to change the project name then and just >>> leave the original project intact? >

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Hello Juergen May I suggest some edits to your letter, below. On 05/14/2016 11:19 PM, Juergen Harms wrote: -- Original Message -- Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On 05/14/2016 07:36 PM, Mauro Condarelli wrote: >> It's not hijacking, it's a fork and there are good reasons for that. Don't >> you think it might be a good idea to change the project name then and just >> leave the original project intact? I appreciate the idea to try and contact Craig Barret

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Il 14/05/2016 19:16, Alexander Moisseev ha scritto: > On 14.05.16 13:04, Juergen Harms wrote: >> active again once new contributors show up? how to avoid that the >> initiative that hopefully will get started by this discussion can be >> mis-interpreted as hijacking? I do not suggest to get lost

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On 14.05.16 13:04, Juergen Harms wrote: > active again once new contributors show up? how to avoid that the > initiative that hopefully will get started by this discussion can be > mis-interpreted as hijacking? I do not suggest to get lost in It's not hijacking, it's a fork and there are good

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On 14-05-2016 13:13, Mauro Condarelli wrote: > Il 14/05/2016 12:04, Juergen Harms ha scritto: >> That sounds positive - tres facent collegium - but I doubt whether three >> is enough as soon as doing succeeds to talking. > VERY true. > >> I see a formal issue: what any future activity will be

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Il 14/05/2016 12:04, Juergen Harms ha scritto: > That sounds positive - tres facent collegium - but I doubt whether three > is enough as soon as doing succeeds to talking. VERY true. > I see a formal issue: what any future activity will be based on (e.g. > the mailing list, the contents at

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

That sounds positive - tres facent collegium - but I doubt whether three is enough as soon as doing succeeds to talking. I see a formal issue: what any future activity will be based on (e.g. the mailing list, the contents at sourcefourge) has been established by predecessors: who are, for

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Hi all, Going back a bit, also check this message: https://sourceforge.net/p/backuppc/mailman/message/34753750/ On 2016-05-14 11:18, Mauro Condarelli wrote: > Il 13/05/2016 23:13, David Cramblett ha scritto: >> If the group was interested in GitHub, then services/platform for items 1 - >> 4

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Il 13/05/2016 23:13, David Cramblett ha scritto: > If the group was interested in GitHub, then services/platform for items 1 - 4 > would be available for free with good tools. Also, GitHub is somewhat of an > industry standard for open source projects now. It also allows for easy > patching

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

If the group was interested in GitHub, then services/platform for items 1 - 4 would be available for free with good tools. Also, GitHub is somewhat of an industry standard for open source projects now. It also allows for easy patching from interested parties via pull request, forking for those who

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Il 13/05/2016 17:44, Juergen Harms ha scritto: > On 05/13/2016 03:04 PM, Mauro Condarelli wrote: >> We*NEED* to move beyond v3.3.1/4.0.0pre, otherwise bitrot will disgregate >> this nice Project. > "Bitrot": I agree - the only question is whether in n or in n+5 years. > "It is a nice project":

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On 05/13/2016 03:04 PM, Mauro Condarelli wrote: > We*NEED* to move beyond v3.3.1/4.0.0pre, otherwise bitrot will disgregate > this nice Project. "Bitrot": I agree - the only question is whether in n or in n+5 years. "It is a nice project": I dont agree - it is much more, it offers so much

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On 13.05.2016 16:04, Mauro Condarelli wrote: > > > Il 13/05/2016 11:49, Juergen Harms ha scritto: >> On 04/22/2016 01:45 PM, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: >>> Someday, when the need arises, someone will pickup the banner and run >>> with it. Post the fix to whatever script needs a line change and

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Il 13/05/2016 11:49, Juergen Harms ha scritto: > On 04/22/2016 01:45 PM, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: >> Someday, when the need arises, someone will pickup the banner and run >> with it. Post the fix to whatever script needs a line change and we the >> users will continue to enjoy the benefits.

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On 04/22/2016 01:45 PM, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: Someday, when the need arises, someone will pickup the banner and run with it. Post the fix to whatever script needs a line change and we the users will continue to enjoy the benefits. Here is a fix that has become necessary with the

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Les Mikesell wrote: v3 uses its own perl implementation to be able to compare to the compressed archived copy.. v4 uses the server's native version. The docs for v4 say: * A modified rsync 3.0.9, called rsync_bpc, is used on the server side, with a C code layer that emulates all the

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:47 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: >> From: Moorcroft, Mark (ARC-TS)[Analytical Mechanics Associates, INC.] >> >> Theproblem is that it replaces modern rsync with some ancient embedded >> version. If that one thing could be "patched" I would hardly care

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

)[Analytical Mechanics Associates, INC.] [mailto:mark.moorcr...@nasa.gov] Sent: den 10 maj 2016 20:12 To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 Theproblem is that it replaces modern rsync with some ancient embedded version. If that one thing could

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

I'm not a perl guy, but does anyone know how embedded the perl rsync is? Could it be replaced with the system rsync? Gerald On 2016-05-10 01:12 PM, Moorcroft, Mark (ARC-TS)[Analytical Mechanics Associates, INC.] wrote: > Personally, I have only one fundamental issue with BackuPC 3.x, that we

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

> -Original Message- > From: Moorcroft, Mark (ARC-TS)[Analytical Mechanics Associates, INC.] > [mailto:mark.moorcr...@nasa.gov] > Sent: den 10 maj 2016 20:12 > To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Personally, I have only one fundamental issue with BackuPC 3.x, that we rely upon to back up all of our linux clients (including a 3000 core cluster). The problem is that it replaces modern rsync with some ancient embedded version. If that one thing could be "patched" I would hardly care about

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

> -Original Message- > From: Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom [mailto:chr...@real-time.com] > Sent: den 22 april 2016 14:05 > To: General list for user discussion, questions and support us...@lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 &

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

> -Original Message- > From: Michael Schumacher [mailto:michael.schumac...@pamas.de] > Sent: den 22 april 2016 13:16 > To: General list for user discussion, questions and support us...@lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupP

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

On 04/22 01:15 , Michael Schumacher wrote: > Some weeks ago, I installed BackupPC on a Banana Pi based on a Centos7 > OS environment. The support for that ARM-platform is still very > basic, but even if the EPEL-repo is not available, I managed to get all > necessary perl components installed.

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

I could be completely wrong but, I have v4.0alpha and v3.31(?) running on two different machines and both are just doing their job. Backing up clients at their locations. Backuppc (IMO) has always been a simple frontend for rsync with some scripts that guide rsync (and other programs) to store

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Hi Sorin, Friday, April 22, 2016, 11:53:27 AM, you wrote: SS> I'm just looking ahead and mulling over what to do whenever, and if, e.g. SS> CentOS 6/7/8+ stops BPC from working because of missing libs and/or other SS> dependencies. Some weeks ago, I installed BackupPC on a Banana Pi based on a

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Hi Michael! When it will become too mature, it will fall down! The World outside IS evolving! Today BPC is a great piece of software and I use it and I like it, but in a few year without development it will be good for a place in a OSS Museum! Regards FCR SIGNATURE

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

> -Original Message- > From: Michael Schumacher [mailto:michael.schumac...@pamas.de] > Sent: den 22 april 2016 11:04 > To: General list for user discussion, questions and support us...@lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 &g

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Hi Sorin, Friday, April 22, 2016, 9:34:11 AM, you wrote: SS> I hope it's not off-topic on this particular list, but what alternatives do SS> we have, that are as easy to install and maintain as BPC? why would you need an alternative? BackupPC is a mature product. I do not miss any features.

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

> -Original Message- > From: Mauro Condarelli [mailto:mc5...@mclink.it] > Sent: den 22 april 2016 09:30 > To: General list for user discussion, questions and support us...@lists.sourceforge.net>; Sorin Srbu <sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se> > Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Sad news. My personal opinion is the Project is effectively dead because none (interested) has write access to the official repositories. There are several clones floating around (several on github, including a semi-official one), but without a central aggregation point there's no way this can

[BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

Hi all, I installed a new BPC-server yesterday and noticed on http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/, that the version 4 is still alpha and has been so since 2013. Might I inquire on how the work is progressing? Is anybody in the know perhaps? Thanks. -- BW, Sorin