thanks a lot :)
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 20:08, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
Dmitry S. Vlasov wrote:
Hm
I decide to wait and got this after ~38 minutes:
JobId: 47
Job:RestoreFiles.2005-08-23_18.24.28
Client:
Hi all
First - huge thanx for trying to integrate VSS with bacula. For more
than three weeks I've been runing a Linux test machine to backup Windows
XP clients. Totally i have 16 Windows XP PC. In the beginning only 2
clients always failed to generate VSS snapshots with an error:
Generate VSS
Hello,
I'm having a problem restoring files from a windows disk. I've read the
section on 'cd to windows disks' and it says 'c:' is treated like a
normal directory, still i can't seem to access them while trying to
restore files. I've tried anything with caps, colons, slashes and
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 09:31, meska wrote:
Hi all
First - huge thanx for trying to integrate VSS with bacula. For more
than three weeks I've been runing a Linux test machine to backup Windows
XP clients. Totally i have 16 Windows XP PC. In the beginning only 2
clients always failed to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kern Sibbald wrote:
| 1. Please help encourage Landon Fuller implement data encryption by
| contributing to EFF. If you haven't seen the announcement about this,
please
| visit: http://www.bacula.org/?page=news For those of you who have
|
Just a few badly organized comments that came into my mind follow:
but I am very reluctant to create a Bacula entity in the US
In addition, some Europeans may object to the US government
having information on funds transfers to them.
As a consequence, I would like to exhaust the
Hi,
From my experience, and I'm sure someone's already said this... the
best was to get money, at least where I work, is to consider the money a
support contract. My superiors like running software without a support
contract even less than they like paying for things. ;)
I will stand in
Bacula gives me this error:23-Aug 14:06 camus-sd: Job camus-weekly-tape-job.2005-08-23_14.05.34 waiting. Cannot find any appendable volumes.Please use the "label" command to create a new Volume for: Storage: tape-storage Media type: DDS-4 Pool:
Hi,
Joe Stump wrote:
Bacula gives me this error:
23-Aug 14:06 camus-sd: Job camus-weekly-tape-job.2005-08-23_14.05.34
waiting. Cannot find any appendable volumes.
Please use the label command to create a new Volume for:
Storage: tape-storage
Media type: DDS-4
Pool:
Hello,
I have a second partition mounted as /var. Despite Bacula should backup all (/)
it does not include /var.
Both root partition and var partition are ext3.
The relevant file set is:
FileSet {
Name = Full Set
Include {
Options {
signature = MD5
compression=GZIP
}
Hello,
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 21:16, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
Just a few badly organized comments that came into my mind follow:
but I am very reluctant to create a Bacula entity in the US
In addition, some Europeans may object to the US government
having information on funds transfers
Hi !
Trying to understand pools volumes
Setup:
Let`s say i only have a Default-Pool defined. Two Clients and two
seperate jobs. Also two (File-)Storage locations. Each client backups to
a seperate storage location BUT have the default-pool configured.
Does this work ? From the
resent to both lists. Sorry.
On 24 Aug 2005 at 15:34, Kern Sibbald wrote:
José Luis what would the best (least disruptive) way be for me to get
Debian's reaction to this?
I know a Debian committer. What would you like me to ask him?
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
BSDCan - The
Hello,
we have 68 jobs, with 34 clients. In other Backup programs i used before
i switched to bacula i had 2 jobs
with these 34 clients. Now every client must have it´s own job.
I don´t want to read 68 short emails every day. I think it is better to
have 2 long emails in which all clients of
Timo Eissler wrote:
Hello,
we have 68 jobs, with 34 clients. In other Backup programs i used before
i switched to bacula i had 2 jobs
with these 34 clients. Now every client must have it´s own job.
I don´t want to read 68 short emails every day. I think it is better to
have 2 long emails
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote:
[...]
If you want to read about my idea, please visit:
http://www.bacula.org/OpenSourceFunding.html Your comments are welcome.
Hi.
Can you say with few words what the consequences of this are for
(free) packaging projects like Debian, BSD ports,
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 15:49, Dan Langille wrote:
On 24 Aug 2005 at 15:34, Kern Sibbald wrote:
José Luis what would the best (least disruptive) way be for me to get
Debian's reaction to this?
I know a Debian committer. What would you like me to ask him?
Ask him to take a look at the
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 16:42, Alan Brown wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Pal Dorogi wrote:
From my experience, and I'm sure someone's already said this... the best
was to get money, at least where I work, is to consider the money a
support contract. My superiors like running software
On 24 Aug 2005 at 16:45, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 15:49, Dan Langille wrote:
On 24 Aug 2005 at 15:34, Kern Sibbald wrote:
José Luis what would the best (least disruptive) way be for me to get
Debian's reaction to this?
I know a Debian committer. What would you
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 16:41, Matthias Kurz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote:
[...]
If you want to read about my idea, please visit:
http://www.bacula.org/OpenSourceFunding.html Your comments are welcome.
Hi.
Can you say with few words what the consequences of this
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 17:08 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
I would like any such companies to step forward, because the idea here for
Bacula is not to make money, but to cover out of pocket costs of development.
If others can make some money and at the same time help the project, so be
it. I
What my superiors generally mean for software support is that if the
product is broken, there will be some assurance that it will be fixed
and allow us to do business. From what I understand, this already takes
place fairly regularly -- if you report a bug, chances are it will get
fixed (I see
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 16:41, Matthias Kurz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote:
[...]
If you want to read about my idea, please visit:
http://www.bacula.org/OpenSourceFunding.html Your comments are welcome.
Hi.
Hi,
Timo Eissler wrote:
Hello,
i am wondering why my differential/incremental backups are so big.
Does anyone know how i can get a list of files and their sizes for a
specified level of a job?
use the command estimate
With this list i can check if i made a mistake in configuring filesets
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 17:31, Matthias Kurz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 16:41, Matthias Kurz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote:
[...]
If you want to read about my idea, please visit:
While we're talking about this, I just gave it a shot. Unfortunately it
appears as it doesn't work for me, and I don't know why:
#.clients
helios-fd
catalyst-fd
#.filesets
Full Set
Catalog
NJMS Catalyst
#.storage
File
helios_DDS
#.jobs
RestoreFiles
NJMSCatalyst
#.pools
Default
catalyst_FULL
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 17:40, David Boyes wrote:
I would like any such companies to step forward, because the
idea here for Bacula is not to make money, but to cover out
of pocket costs of development.
I'm up for it.
Could you explain in more detail what you feel you could do?
If
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 18:14, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
While we're talking about this, I just gave it a shot. Unfortunately it
appears as it doesn't work for me, and I don't know why:
#.clients
helios-fd
catalyst-fd
#.filesets
Full Set
Catalog
NJMS Catalyst
#.storage
File
Hi,
Kern Sibbald wrote:
2. Bacula Foundation
3. Bacula Funding Idea
http://www.bacula.org/OpenSourceFunding.html Your comments are welcome.
The ongoing discussion is interesting, but I thought of something a
little different after reading your document.
I'm not thinking about the
I'm fine with the way I chose it. There WERE differential backups before
08/22 in the blow example, however. When I try to look at the restore
tree, though, it only will work when I choose Before and the date of
the most recent full backup.
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ |
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 18:12 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Yes, but none of those organizations or any other packager uses our source
rpm. Also, please note very carefully the word probably in the above
sentence -- that means, I am unsure about what I am saying or undecided.
Ok, but somebody
Hello,
I use the default schedule:
Schedule {
Name = WeeklyCycle
Run = Full 1st sun at 3:05
Run = Differential 2nd-5th sun at 3:05
Run = Incremental mon-sat at 3:05
}
All generations should be store on the same volume. But every full backup
should take a new volume. One way to do this is
Sorry for the last post ... I guess I'm missing something now. I've changed my volume retention to 5 days (I run tapes Mon-Fri and have a different pool for the weekend when I'm not around) and bacula still refuses to write over the data. Am I missing something? Doesn't "Volume Retention = 5 days"
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 19:12, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
Kern Sibbald wrote:
2. Bacula Foundation
3. Bacula Funding Idea
http://www.bacula.org/OpenSourceFunding.html Your comments are welcome.
The ongoing discussion is interesting, but I thought of something a
little different
Can someone explain to me the use of Use Any Volume? What I want is for
bacula to use the tape with the lowest ID that is writable. I definite
writable as any volume that is in a state that will allow it to be
written to (including a tape that contains data but whose retention time
has
Hello,
I am having a problem with bacula 1.37.30 and restoring large(?) 150MB+
files. But it seems to be only some of the files (see extract from the
log below) and the files were *not* being used, they are self-extracting
archives being stored for download.
The system is Solaris 9 and bacula
On Di, 23 Aug 2005, José Luis Tallón [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Volker Sauer wrote:
On Di, 23 Aug 2005, Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any chance you can upgrade to version 1.37.36 at least for this
machine? I'm 99% sure I've resolved all these kinds of lockups in the
Hi,
Michael Dauer wrote:
Hello,
I use the default schedule:
Schedule {
Name = WeeklyCycle
Run = Full 1st sun at 3:05
Run = Differential 2nd-5th sun at 3:05
Run = Incremental mon-sat at 3:05
}
All generations should be store on the same volume. But every full backup
should take a new
Hello,
Joe Stump wrote:
Sorry for the last post ...
I guess I'm missing something now. I've changed my volume retention to 5
days (I run tapes Mon-Fri and have a different pool for the weekend when
I'm not around) and bacula still refuses to write over the data. Am I
missing something?
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 19:53, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 18:12 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Yes, but none of those organizations or any other packager uses our
source rpm. Also, please note very carefully the word probably in the
above sentence -- that means, I am
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 20:34, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
Can someone explain to me the use of Use Any Volume?
That directive is obsolete and if I am not mistaken not used anywhere.
The rest is in the manual, or I leave the list to respond.
What I want is for
bacula to use the tape with
Now it wants tape-0001 ... I want it to take the tape I put in there and recycle it. Why is this so hard for bacula to understand? If the tape that is in there is stale it should nuked it and label it to its liking. Instead it's just sitting there wanting me to put last Monday's tape in on
If you are using PostgreSQL, and it involves multiple tapes, and the tapes are
not read back in the order that they were written, it is possible that you
have run into a rather obscure bug.
That bug is fixed in 1.37.36, but the fix corrects a problem with writing the
JobMedia records, so it
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 20:47, Phil Stracchino wrote:
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
Can someone explain to me the use of Use Any Volume? What I want is for
bacula to use the tape with the lowest ID that is writable. I definite
writable as any volume that is in a state that will allow it to be
Joe,
can you give us the output from the bconsole command llist volume=xxx
where xxx should be the name of the tape already in the drive?
Arno
Joe Stump wrote:
Now it wants tape-0001 ... I want it to take the tape I put in there and
recycle it. Why is this so hard for bacula to understand?
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 20:53 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Yes, anyone can create anything from the source.
Ok, cool.
I'm not sure about the requirements for Fedora Extras and CentOS
Extras.
Yeah, wasn't questioning that, I'm somewhat familiar w/ them.
I'm not trying to restrict anyone any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arno Lehmann wrote:
Josh Endries wrote:
Is it possible to have multiple clients back up nightly to a bacula
server with one autochanger?
Yes.
Okay, that's good news...now to just get it working. ;)
Should be in the manual. You're on the
Hello,
I'm trying to test out the latest bacula 1.37.36 beta on freebsd. I've
disabled my running 1.36 system, which was installed from ports and
downloaded the source tarball. I'm using the below configuration command,
already having mysql installed as a port, but configure won't pick it up.
Hello,
Well, this Open Source Funding idea has generated some interest that is for
sure. I'm surprised that the email is so positive (or maybe I should say not
negative depending on how one wants to look at it). In all the emails, there
was only one gripe, no flames, a fair number of I don't
Kern,
I mistyped the directive. It is Accept Any Volume. Am I to understand
that this is obselete, or did I merely accidentally refer to an old
name? I read it in the manual:
*Accept Any Volume = yes|no*
This directive specifies whether or not any volume from the Pool may
be used for
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 21:18, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 20:53 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Yes, anyone can create anything from the source.
Ok, cool.
I'm not sure about the requirements for Fedora Extras and CentOS
Extras.
Yeah, wasn't questioning that, I'm somewhat
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 21:27, dave wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to test out the latest bacula 1.37.36 beta on freebsd. I've
disabled my running 1.36 system, which was installed from ports and
downloaded the source tarball. I'm using the below configuration command,
already having mysql
Hi,
Josh Endries wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arno Lehmann wrote:
Josh Endries wrote:
Is it possible to have multiple clients back up nightly to a bacula
server with one autochanger?
Yes.
Okay, that's good news...now to just get it working. ;)
Should be in
I setup Bacula to e-mail every report on each job, this way I can tell which
ones failed. But it doesn't work properly.
In this case, the job runs completely, but a file had an Error: Read error on
... ERR=Data error (cyclic redundancy check), but Bacula said in the subject
line of the e-mail
Back to my original question: If I have LabelMedia=yes in my storage resource then why do I need to label this tape? I'll check out the purge/delete commands I guess.--JoeOn Aug 24, 2005, at 1:26 PM, Arno Lehmann wrote:If the label is removed, you can recreate it with the btape program. In this
Hi,
I send this to the list, too.
Joe Stump wrote:
Okay, I deleted all of the volumes and bacula is still asking me to
label the media. WHY?! Am I wrong is or is bacula simply unable to label
and rewrite to a blank tape?
Definitely not.
But, as I pointed out in the beginning, I can't
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 22:05 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
That would be nice.
however my time is pretty taken up with Legacy and with a book Im
writing,
so we'll see (:
If I can't get to it myself, I'll toss it up there for somebody else who
wants to help out.
Good luck with your book.
I'm currently using 1.36.2 successfully, but am looking at the features coming
in 1.37, and am particularly interested in the scratch pool feature. I
understand this allows me to put all my tapes in the scratch pool, and they
will be moved into daily/weekly/monthly pools as required. What I would
On Thursday 25 August 2005 03:40, Craig Holyoak wrote:
I'm currently using 1.36.2 successfully, but am looking at the features
coming in 1.37, and am particularly interested in the scratch pool feature.
I understand this allows me to put all my tapes in the scratch pool, and
they will be moved
59 matches
Mail list logo
