I'm now using a workaround: I generated a list of big files and defined a
separate fileset for the base job. With that approach I don't reduce the
necessary space that much but the full backup only takes 0:45 (which is about
½ of a full backup without base job).
Still I think base jobs with lots
Hi Landon,
Am 19.11.2012 18:16, schrieb Landon J Fuller:
On Nov 10, 2012, at 10:10 AM, Felix Schwarz felix.schw...@oss.schwarz.eu
wrote:
Somehow my console can't query the SD status. If I start the sd with '-d100'
I
only see this output:
SSL routines:SSL3_GET_CLIENT_CERTIFICATE:no
Hi,
I'm trying to debug a TLS verification issue:
Somehow my console can't query the SD status. If I start the sd with '-d100' I
only see this output:
SSL routines:SSL3_GET_CLIENT_CERTIFICATE:no certificate returned
authenticate.c:190-0 Unable to authenticate Director at client.
I assume this
Hey,
Am 05.11.2012 16:27, schrieb Marco van Wieringen:
strace is about the worst way of determining what is going on. If you really
want to know what is going on I would say run the fd/sd/dir with a -f -d 100
to debug it.
Did that and I found out that Bacula was somehow busy adding all the
Hi Gary,
PostgreSQL is supported. The README.Fedora file in
/usr/share/doc/bacula-common-5.2.11/ contains all the details.
fs
--
LogMeIn Central: Instant, anywhere, Remote PC access and management.
Stay in control,
Am 05.11.2012 11:12, schrieb Marco van Wieringen:
Looks like its busy updating the sqlite database with backup info.
You probably have configured the system with attribute spooling which
means that after the backup is done the director needs to update the
database with all the file data to be
Am 05.11.2012 15:20, schrieb Felix Schwarz:
Btw: What does 'Spool Attributes = yes/no' do? I wasn't able to find much info
in the docs on that.
Scratch that, I found it (SpoolAttributes) after I remembered that white
spaces are not significant in the option names.
fs
Hi Luis,
Am 03.11.2012 12:57, schrieb Luis H. Forchesatto:
Quantos arquivos são backupeados?
How many files are backed up?
(I used Google translate, let's hope I understood you correctly)
I checked the base backup job and that one had ~700k files with a total of ~65
GB (uncompressed). That
Hey,
Am 01.11.2012 22:16, schrieb Domen Kožar:
Can you show configuration? Do you have compression enabled?
Here's the fileset:
FileSet {
Name = data
Include {
Options {
signature = SHA1
compression = GZIP
portable = yes
Hi,
I'm running Bacula 5.2.12 (RPMs distributed by Simone Caronni on
repos.fedorapeople.org) on CentOS 6 (x86_64) with a sqlite catalog.
I defined a base backup job and a regular backup job. The base job worked fine
after the subsequent full backup the bacula director hangs: It consumes all
CPU
Joseph L. Casale schrieb:
The sigs for the gpg key on the sourceforge download don't
match the sigs on the el5 rpms, anyone know where to get the
proper key?
To me everything looks good. The CentOS/el5 RPMs should be signed with my key
0xFAF24CCA which is available as
Jet Wilda schrieb:
File not found: /var/tmp/bacula-root/usr/sbin/bat
File not found: /var/tmp/bacula-root/etc/bacula/bat.conf
bat does not build on CentOS 5 because bat requires QT 4.3 (iirc) and CentOS
only ships QT 4.2. Either upgrade QT or send a patch to make bat working with
Hi Devin,
Devin Reade schrieb:
It doesn't appear that the bacula-bat RPMs are up on sourceforge in
the fschwarz directory as they were with previous releases. I'm assuming
that this is related to the qt problems described in April and May
on this list.
Exactly.
Is there a plan to release
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Anyone know of plans to add Bacula 2.2.8 to Extra Packages for
Enterprise Linux (EPEL) ?
While there are plans (and partially SPEC files) to upgrade Fedora's bacula
to 2.2, I wouldn't bet that EPEL's bacula will be rebased to 2.2.
Generally, EPEL tries to avoid
Mike Seda schrieb:
were your rpms based on an --enable-batch-insert option to ./configure ?
As far as I can see, this option is not set in the RPM spec file
(bacula.spec in Scott's SRPM). If --enable-batch-insert is not set by
default, you can mail Scott to change this setting. All packagers
Dave wrote:
What is the latest bacula rpms available for centos 5.x?
I will upload these early next week.
If you don't need Bacula's latest features, I recommend using the bacula
rpms in Fedora EPEL. That way you get easy upgrades (yum update) and don't
have to download rpms manually.
Stephane Baziak wrote:
First of all, many thanks for the good job with the maintenance of
bacula Fedora rpms. I was in the process of redeploying bacula on a FC5
system but I could not locate the file
bacula-gconsole-2.2.6-1.fc5.i386.rpm on SF. May be you can help?
FC5 ships with a version
Brian A. Seklecki schrieb:
Does anyone know why Fedora 8 YUM repo is stuck back on Bacula 2.0.3? I
thought we were supposed to be beta-testing new development branch code
for Redhat clients :)
AFAIK the only reason is that Andreas Thienemann is too busy currently to
update
Bacula to 2.2.
Just a short update: Fedora 5 RPMs are online since last week. RPMs for Fedora
8
are currently blocked due to a glibc 2.7 issue. I'm still investigating this
(help welcome as always ;-).
fs
-
SF.Net email is sponsored
As you may have noticed, I uploaded rpms for Fedora {6,7} {i386,x86_64} and
CentOS/RHEL FC {4,5} {i386,x86_64} today. RPMs for Fedora 8 and (as a test how
many users need it) Fedora Core 5 will follow in a few days.
fs
Mark,
Mark Nienberg wrote:
Sourceforge shows that your version 2.0.3 for fedora 5 had:
312 downloads for the client,
221 downloads for mysql,
130 downloads for postgre, and
140 downloads for sqlite
for a total of 803 (combining i386 and x86_64).
But these RPMs were built in April 2007.
Hi,
as you might have noticed, I published RPMs for Bacula 2.2.4 on Fedora {6,7}
and
CentOS {4,5} on i386 and x86_64.
Attention: Do not use the RPMs packages if you installed Bacula from the
official Fedora repositories or Fedora EPEL! You will need to uninstall these
RPMs before installing
Adam Cécile schrieb:
I don't understand at all where I can grab bacula rpms.
I saw fschwarz announce but can't find any RPM anywhere...
What distribution do you use?
For Fedora {6,7} you can just do yum install bacula-client (do yum search
bacula to see the other available packages).
For
Dave schrieb:
I've downloaded the bacula src.rpm and installed it on a Centos 5
machine. I want to build binaries but am only seeing build options for
rhel4, i know there's a way around this i just can't remember what it is.
any help appreciated.
The fastest method getting a CentOS
Alan Brown schrieb:
There's an RFE (Feature request) in with Redhat for inclusion of Bacula in
RHEL4 and 5. I filed that in January.
Short update: Fedora EPEL is not RHEL but Bacula is now in Fedora EPEL 5 so if
you use RHEL 5 or CentOS 5, there are binaries for you :-)
fs
FI just noticed that the new Bacula RPMs made it into Fedora 7, too. Therefore,
I won't upload F7 RPMs to Sourceforge.
Please note that the Fedora RPMs have a different structure than the RPMs
provided on Bacula's Sourceforge page.
The bacula fd can be found in the 'bacula-client' package.
To
Hi *,
Andreas Thienemann's bacula RPMs for Fedora finally were accepted so Fedora 8
will ship Bacula! Fedora EPEL (aka RPMs for CentOS/RHEL 4/5) does not come with
all required packages at the moment, so Bacula is not into EPEL yet. According
to Andreas this should be solved soon.
Bacula on
Wes Hardaker schrieb:
I can supply the current RPM and patches to anyone else that wants to
take the task on though if anyone wants to do it instead.
Thanks for your offer but Andreas Thienemann already completed that task:
Bacula
will be in Fedora 8 :-)
fs
Dimitrios schrieb:
Are there any plans to create Fedora 7 rpms on one of the popular fedora
repositories, like Freshrpms.net, Livna, fedora extras, etc?
Yes, definitely.
Sorry for the long delay in creating F7 bacula rpms, I needed bigger hard drives
to create new virtual machines for
Alexandre Bunn schrieb:
I pretend test the Bacula Software and I would like a tip of Cook Book
to configure bacula for a backup using a Hard Disk.
What about
http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/Automated_Disk_Backup.html ?
fs
Dave schrieb:
I was on the bacula sourceforge site looking for rhel5 rpms for CentOS5.
I found several rpm areas all for 2.03 but with different contributors. I
was wondering what the difference was between the various rpms?
All RPMs listed on Sourceforge are built from the same source
Dave schrieb:
Thanks for your reply and clarification. Do you compile encryption
support in to your rpms?
Yes.
fs
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2
Arno Lehmann schrieb:
I'm also not a guru - and even cmpletely inexperienced regarding Bacula
TLS - but that would be a bug... It must be possible to tell the DIR to
only accept console connections initiated by a client which can identify
itself through TLS. Otherwise, the whole console
The CentOS team released the RHEL 5 clone a few days ago. Therefore I created
some some virtual machines for building bacula rpms and just uploaded rpms for
i386 and x86_64 (see rpms-contrib-fschwarz package on the bacula sourceforge
page).
Please note that these packages were built with the
Hi Tim,
(I'm sending this mail to the public list as this may be of interest for
others,
too)
Tim Schoellhammer wrote:
Gibt es einen Speziellen Grund das diese rpms nicht in die jeweiligen
repositories committed werden?
(English/short: Why aren't these RPMs not part of the {Fedora, RHEL}
Fedora {5,6} + EL 4 RPMs are released, too.
Please note that there are efforts getting bacula into mainline Fedora. Andreas
Thienemann did a great job there. I think that these RPMs (once accepted in
Fedora) will find their way into Enterprise Extras which is good news to all EL
users out
Jason King schrieb:
On another note, what packages are required to install and run the
bacula client. The RPM requires some dependencies but it is requiring
some .so.# files and I don't know what package those libraries would be
under.
I suggest using yum or something similar and put the
Ryan Novosielski schrieb:
RHEL4.1 and RHEL4.4 are not even that similar as pertains to version
numbers.
Furthermore, all RHEL-RPMs assume a fully patched system that has the highest
update level currently available (e.g. update 4 for RHEL 4). If you do use
older
versions of RHEL with the
Mike Seda schrieb:
I wish to install bacula 2.0.0 on my el4 system. I just have a
question... What is the difference between the rpms and
rpms-contrib-fschwarz links at
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=50727 ? Is there a
reason why these links are separated?
Due to
Alan Brown schrieb:
One of the other posters has commented on the updatedb problem if a mysql
root/bacula password is set.
As locking down mysql access is essential for security, I think it would
be best if the script asked for login/pass before touching mysql
This is one of the
Kern Sibbald schrieb:
That and the fact that their upload process is *extremely* insecure -- it is
trivial to modify anyone's code, and it would be super trivial to substitute
a root kit or any other attack without the knowledge of the person releasing
the files. I informed Source Forge of
Hi Kern,
I'm seeing the compression problem here, too. Interestingly, a WinXP laptop
with an 1.38
fd DOES compression while my 2.0 fds on {CentOS x86_64, FC6 x86_64} do not
(they did
before the update).
fs
-
Take
Michael Nelson schrieb:
I am nervous though. If 2.0 doesn't work out, will I have a way to get
back to what does work (1.38.11)? If I just make copies of all the stuff
in /etc/bacula and /var/lib/mysql/bacula and /var/bacula will that be
enough to let me get back to where I am now?
Instead
Jaime Ventura wrote:
I got a bit confused with your email.
Does this mean from now on you will release the rpm packages of bacula?
Scott is the official RPM packager. He writes the bacula.spec file which
controls the RPM
creation. Besides Scott, there are some package building
Hi all,
my build infrastructure is in place now, so I released new RPMs for FC5
(x86_64), FC6
(i386 and x86_64) and CentOS/RHEL 4.4 (x86_64). You can find them in the
package
rpms-contrib-fschwarz. All RPMs are signed by my new RPM signing key (ID:
0xFAF24CCA). The
rpmkey package contains a
Arnaud Mombrial wrote:
Does anyone knows if there would be (or is there already ??) an fc6 package
for bacula-client ?
Sorry for the delay, I was *extremly* busy last month. I will build an fc6 x86
this week.
x86_64 as soon Xen is working on my new, shiny Dell build monster ;-)
fs
PS: fc5
Timo Neuvonen wrote:
So, the question: Does 1.38.11-3 source rpm really contain
support for the build_python option, or has that just been added to
the documentation in advance while preparing to future releases?
There is a bacula-python.spec file which has support for the build_python
option.
Georg Lutz wrote:
Can anyone confirm this problem?
yes, seeing this problem too. Unfortunately I have very little time now to track
down the problem...
fs
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
Scott Barninger wrote:
This release carries an updated spec file for the 1.38.11-3 srpm
released to add python support. Currently there is not a lot of useful
python functionality in 1.38 but it is expected to be present when 1.40
is released. I'm looking for some build testing on various
Hi Kern,
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Bottom line, unless Scott decides to load a FC5 system, there will no
longer be any FC5 rpms other than the source rpm. Since I have pity on
FC5 users (guinea pigs for the RedHat cowboys -- I *was* one), over time
(perhaps a month) I'll try to bring up an FC5 on
Hi all,
I have some trouble with volume labeling (Bacula 1.38.5 on CentOS 4.2
with the latest patches). I do my backups to disk only and defined two
jobs that use different storages and pools but the same label format. Do
the following the reproduce the behavior:
Do 10 backups only with the
Hi,
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Volume names must be unique.
May I suggestion some additions to the documentation? I did not found
a note regarding this issue in
http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/Getting_Started_with_Bacula.html#SECTION00092000
or
Hi all,
the Bacula releases include some Python example files (DirStartUp.py,
FDStartUp.py, SDStartUp.py). These examples use Python old-style
classes which do not inherit from object. This has some consequeneces
when using inheritance and you may get into trouble when the old-style
classes are
Hi all,
(sorry, if this message will be posted twice.)
I have some trouble with volume labeling (Bacula 1.38.5 on CentOS 4.2
with the latest patches). I do my backups to disk only and defined two
jobs that use different storages and pools but the same label format.
Do the following the reproduce
Hallo Landon,
Landon Fuller schrieb:
Win32 support for transport encryption requires a small amount of code
to implement entropy gathering using Microsoft's Crypto API. I'm the
blocking factor there -- building the win32 file daemon is complicated,
and while I can run Windows via kqemu, I
Craig White wrote:
Looking to install on CentOS 4
I see 1.38.0-1 rpms for RHEL 3 and other rh/fc versions.
Should I just install 1.31 from tarball or get source rpm and rebuild?
I built CentOS 4 RPMs with TLS and Python support which are working fine
although I did not have the time to
Hallo Thorsten,
Thorsten Huber schrieb:
is there somewhere a downloadable archive of the bacula-users and
bacula-devel mailinglists? I cannont find such a service on
sourceforge or any hints in recent mails in the sourceforge
webinterface to the bacula archives.
have a look at:
Hi all,
I'm experiencing some configurations issues enabling TLS on 1.37.38.
bacula-dir.conf
Director {# define myself
Name = maindirector
TLS Enable = yes
TLS Require = yes
TLS Certificate = /etc/bacula/certs/server1.schwarz.local.crt
TLS Key =
Hi Landon,
Landon Fuller schrieb:
Which at least provides some indication that a certificate validation
failure occurred. Does your client not print that full message?
It does but the SSL error seemed to be more meaningful to me when I
saw it the first time (because the error during the TLS
Hi all,
I just wanted to tell about some features I would like to see
implemented in/with Bacula.
These features came to my mind after experimenting with a new business
idea: Many people and small enterprises don't have real backups right
now. My idea is to give them older PCs (currently small
Hi,
Gerd Mueller wrote:
backup-sd: Ready to read from volume full0019 on device
/var/backups/bacula/File.
kliniken-data-fd: -rwxrwxrwx 1 00 19456 2005-02-24
09:21:41 /tmp/bacula-restores/e//Meddok/2004 - Entbindungsf[1].
Gnzburg.doc
Are you shure that
Hi Vini,
sorry Vini, hit the wrong button... :-/
Vini wrote:
What I am trying to understand is the differences between incremental
and differential backup. They both are meant to backup the modified
files since the last full backup so what is the difference between them?
IIRC incremental
Hi Arno
Arno Lehmann wrote (30.03.2005):
Felix Schwarz wrote:
I'm experiencing some problems restoring a file with bacula 1.34.6.
The file was originally stored on a win2k Client before bacula saved
it on my linux box.
(...)
everything looks ok to me...
Select the Client (1-2
63 matches
Mail list logo
