, 2005 08:20
To: Chris Lee
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Forcing Pools for upgraded jobs
Chris Lee wrote:
Good morning everyone,
Can a backup job which has been upgraded to Full be forced to use a
different Pool in the director config
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 12:35, Alan Brown wrote:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote:
By the way, you all might be interested to know that Microsoft has filed
a patent application for what are essentially smilies :-) ;-) :-( ...
The patent is on converting them to graphics. If it
Kern Sibbald wrote:
By the way, you all might be interested to know that Microsoft has filed a
patent application for what are essentially smilies :-) ;-) :-( ... The
patent is on converting them to graphics. If it passes, my program Kmail
would be in violation of their patent for having
Good morning everyone,
Can a backup job which has been upgraded to Full be forced to use a
different Pool in the director config?
Example situation:
1) A new client is added to the director config in the middle of the month.
2) Full backups occur at the beginning of the month.
3) The new client
Chris Lee wrote:
Good morning everyone,
Can a backup job which has been upgraded to Full be forced to use a
different Pool in the director config?
Example situation:
1) A new client is added to the director config in the middle of the month.
2) Full backups occur at the beginning of the
-users] Forcing Pools for upgraded jobs
Chris Lee wrote:
Good morning everyone,
Can a backup job which has been upgraded to Full be forced to use a
different Pool in the director config?
Example situation:
1) A new client is added to the director config in the
middle of the month
