Hello Eddie,
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Eddie Appel wrote:
> Ana,
>
> Thanks for the response, answers inline...
>
You're welcome :).
>
>
> On 03/24/2016 06:46 PM, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote:
>
> Hello Eddie,
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Eddie Appel
On 03/25/2016 11:14 AM, Heitor Faria wrote:
Having the same media type between the two changers actually
produced a scenario wherein bacula became confused with slot
numbers and pool inventory. If memory serves, it was Kern who
suggested I use LTOa and LTOb as media types
> Having the same media type between the two changers actually produced a
> scenario
> wherein bacula became confused with slot numbers and pool inventory. If memory
> serves, it was Kern who suggested I use LTOa and LTOb as media types between
> the changers to avoid this contention.
Hello,
Ana,
Thanks for the response, answers inline...
On 03/24/2016 06:46 PM, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote:
Hello Eddie,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Eddie Appel > wrote:
Hello List,
Forgive the long post, but I have a situation here
Hello Eddie,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Eddie Appel wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> Forgive the long post, but I have a situation here that requires some
> help...
>
> My current setup...
> -- NetApp filer containing ~35TB of data to be backed up to tape
> -- Quantumi40 w/
Hello List,
Forgive the long post, but I have a situation here that requires some
help...
My current setup...
-- NetApp filer containing ~35TB of data to be backed up to tape
-- Quantumi40 w/ 2 LTO-5 drives
-- Quantum SL3 w/ 1 LTO-5 drive
-- HP DL-380G5 with 16GB RAM and 3 x spool hdd
-- CentOS
Op 2013-03-27 om 13:12 schreef Paul Mather:
On Mar 26, 2013, at 11:44 PM, Bill Arlofski wrote:
On 03/26/13 22:33, Wood Peter wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to use Bacula to do file level backup of about 15 Linux
systems. Total backup size is about 2TB.
For Bacula server I'm thinking to
Thanks all for the help.
To use the space more efficiently what I decided to do is use vtapes, limit
the file size to 10GB and after a full backup just scp the related files to
a server in the office. I still have to do the proof of concept setup but
from what I'm reading this should be doable.
On Mar 26, 2013, at 11:44 PM, Bill Arlofski waa-bac...@revpol.com wrote:
On 03/26/13 22:33, Wood Peter wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to use Bacula to do file level backup of about 15 Linux
systems. Total backup size is about 2TB.
For Bacula server I'm thinking to buy Dell PE R520 with 24TB
Hi,
I'm planning to use Bacula to do file level backup of about 15 Linux
systems. Total backup size is about 2TB.
For Bacula server I'm thinking to buy Dell PE R520 with 24TB internal
storage (8x 3TB disks) and use virtual tapes.
- I'm backing up mostly text configuration files.
How many full
On 03/26/13 22:33, Wood Peter wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to use Bacula to do file level backup of about 15 Linux
systems. Total backup size is about 2TB.
For Bacula server I'm thinking to buy Dell PE R520 with 24TB internal
storage (8x 3TB disks) and use virtual tapes.
Hi Peter. First,
All,
I'm using bacula to backup desktop and laptop clients. The desktops work
well with a schedule, but laptops are another story. Does anyone have a
strategy to backup laptops? Is it possible to have the user trigger a
backup?
Any feedback is welcomed.
Anthony Avarca
aava...@anl.gov
Hi Anthony,
Avarca, Anthony wrote:
All,
I'm using bacula to backup desktop and laptop clients. The desktops work
well with a schedule, but laptops are another story. Does anyone have a
strategy to backup laptops? Is it possible to have the user trigger a
backup?
Any feedback is
We back up about 200 workstation clients currently backing up, I would
say out of that; 80 of them are laptops. I found that rescheduling the
backup on failure seems to work with a 10 hour window. This is added to
a JobDefs as such:
This way, when a user comes in later on in the day and missed
Hi,
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010, Avarca, Anthony wrote:
I'm using bacula to backup desktop and laptop clients. The desktops work
well with a schedule, but laptops are another story. Does anyone have a
strategy to backup laptops? Is it possible to have the user trigger a
backup?
It's not the
Gavin McCullagh wrote:
1. Start bconsole
2. Type runreturn
3. Type exitreturn
4. The messages are emailed to the user so they know when the job is
finished.
Assuming the laptop is running a Debian based Linux distro: can't this
be automated by running a backup script from
Hi,
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010, Avi Rozen wrote:
Gavin McCullagh wrote:
1. Start bconsole
2. Type runreturn
3. Type exitreturn
4. The messages are emailed to the user so they know when the job is
finished.
Assuming the laptop is running a Debian based Linux distro: can't this
be
Hi,
we use bacula a long time(6 years) to backup linux and windows server.
It works create!!!
Now one harddisk (Raid5) is defect in the bacula server and we consider
to buy a new server.
I think we can buy a large server with tapelibrary (DELL TL2000 LTO3).
Our consideration are:
- We want to
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 7:56 AM, thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
we use bacula a long time(6 years) to backup linux and windows server.
It works create!!!
Now one harddisk (Raid5) is defect in the bacula server and we consider
to buy a new server.
I think we can buy a large server
Thanks verymuch for then explanation Martin. I see your point. In fact,
we are not so worried about disaster recovery, since this files I mention in
this backup are text documents.
And generally, users ask restore of some files in particular, not
folders. Besides, they usually don't tend
. 04.50.64.11.46 - Fax. 04.50.64.23.83
http://www.alpes-controles.fr
- Message Original -
De: Marek Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: lundi 19 novembre 2007 10 h 30 (GMT+0100) Europe/Berlin
Sujet: Re: [Bacula-users] backup strategy
David is right
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:55:30 -0300, Augusto Camarotti said:
Nowadays we have a backup strategy like this :
Daily Backup = Monday-Thursday = Full Backups with individual tapes for each
weekday.
Weekly Backup = 2nd-5th Friday =3D Full Backups with individual tapes for 7
Fridays
Montly
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:14:24 -0300, Augusto Camarotti said:
Hi Mark, thanks for the reply
When I was saying the generally 3 GB of data was added, I was counting on
data changed, since new data is being added when a change is made. I just
don`t express it right.
Ah, OK.
I didnt
. 04.50.64.23.83
http://www.alpes-controles.fr
- Message Original -
De: Marek Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: lundi 19 novembre 2007 10 h 30 (GMT+0100) Europe/Berlin
Sujet: Re: [Bacula-users] backup strategy
David is right. Bacula is not able to clear
Nowadays we have a backup strategy like this :
Daily Backup = Monday-Thursday = Full Backups with individual tapes for each
weekday.
Weekly Backup = 2nd-5th Friday = Full Backups with individual tapes for 7
Fridays
Montly Backup = 1st Friday = Full Backups with individual tapes for 12
months
This
Hi Sebastian,
I'm only a newbie to this but looking at your director config settings
it looks like you haven't expressed a maximum volume size. Therefore
Bacula will keep filling up a volume until your disk runs out. To force
Bacula to stop filling a volume and look around for another one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
DVD's are 4.7GB no? Could get some more data on there, probably.
Lucas Di Pentima wrote:
Hello all,
I'm thinking about creating a backup strategy using DVD-R's and
harddisk, maybe you can help me sorting out the strategy.
Scenario:
*
Hi Ryan,
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
DVD's are 4.7GB no? Could get some more data on there, probably.
DVD's are really 4.4 I think, but my concern is if my proposed
configuration is correct, or convenient.
Regards,
--
Lucas Di Pentima - Santa Fe, Argentina - Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LUNIX
Hello all,
I'm thinking about creating a backup strategy using DVD-R's and
harddisk, maybe you can help me sorting out the strategy.
Scenario:
* Bacula 1.38.x
* Debian Linux director
* Debian Linux Windows clients
* Two schedules: ServerCycle (at night) and WorkstationCycle (start at
Hi,
I want to backup 2 of our server to tape (AIT-2, 50GB native, 65-70GB
compressed, TLS-4210 12 slot autochanger). bacula 1.36.3 (debian sarge,
maybe I'll build bacula 1.38.4 from source...) is running and I'm already
able to backup to tape.
Both machines are also backed up to disk by an other
Hello,
On 1/19/2006 12:08 PM, Ralf Gross wrote:
Hi,
I want to backup 2 of our server to tape (AIT-2, 50GB native, 65-70GB
compressed, TLS-4210 12 slot autochanger). bacula 1.36.3 (debian sarge,
maybe I'll build bacula 1.38.4 from source...) is running and I'm already
able to backup to tape.
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Using volumes from more than one pool in one autochanger is not supported
with 1.36, and you will probably run into problems sooner or later.
That's not quite right, I have 4 pools loaded in my autochanger and have
had for several years.
The problem
On Thursday 19 January 2006 15:10, Alan Brown wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Using volumes from more than one pool in one autochanger is not supported
with 1.36, and you will probably run into problems sooner or later.
That's not quite right, I have 4 pools loaded in my
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
The workaround for pool contention is to disable multiple simultaneous
backups, which unfortunately defeats the purpose of having multiple
drives, but is better than having backups aborting.
A better workaround is to upgrade to 1.38.4 or 1.38.5, where
Hi,
On 1/19/2006 3:10 PM, Alan Brown wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Using volumes from more than one pool in one autochanger is not
supported with 1.36, and you will probably run into problems sooner or
later.
That's not quite right, I have 4 pools loaded in my
Hello,
On 1/19/2006 3:11 PM, Ralf Gross wrote:
...
Determining the right strategy is, obviously, up to you. (You wouldn't
be the first to discover that your autochanger doesn't fit your needs,
though.)
At the moment, tapes are the only way to archive data and put them into a
safe here.
Arno Lehmann schrieb:
On 1/19/2006 3:11 PM, Ralf Gross wrote:
[snip]
At the moment, tapes are the only way to archive data and put them into a
safe here. 200GB+ disk are still more expensive and need more space than
tapes.
No, I wouldn't recommen to use disks as backup media *shudder*...
I have set up Bacula's director to manage about 50 GB of daily changes
out of 200 GB of disk space expected to grow to 1 TB this year as
follows:
1) It uses disk i.e. storage=file (instead of tape) for the actual backups.
2) The disk is actually an NFS mount point that gets backed up (think
dd)
Alan Brown wrote:
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
- nominally, the next tape would be taken into use in the beginning
of every
month
Reasons behind this are minimal manual handling of the tapes,
knowing there
will be loss of up to one month's data if the current tape gets
On Sunday 25 September 2005 00:24, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
After some occasional experiments with Bacula, I finally started reading
the manual (my printed version is for 1.36.0) page by page, my goal being
to set up a decently working backup strategy instead of occasional backups.
So far, my
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
- nominally, the next tape would be taken into use in the beginning of every
month
Reasons behind this are minimal manual handling of the tapes, knowing there
will be loss of up to one month's data if the current tape gets destroyed. I
believe my tape
After some occasional experiments with Bacula, I finally started reading the
manual (my printed version is for 1.36.0) page by page, my goal being to set
up a decently working backup strategy instead of occasional backups.
So far, my idea is roughly the following:
- pool of 12 tapes, each of
I have 10 systems to be backed up evenly
divided into linux and windows boxes (5 5). I want to maintain two
pools one for each type and have separate volume for each job. So Pool-A
will have vol-001, vol-002 and so on for the 5 linux machines and similarly
for the windows machine pool. Each pool
I have 10 systems to be backed up evenly
divided into linux and windows boxes (5 5). I want to maintain two
pools one for each type and have separate volume for each job. So Pool-A
will have vol-001, vol-002 and so on for the 5 linux machines and similarly
for the windows machine pool. Each pool
Aditya Ivaturi wrote:
and so on. In this case Lun11 and Lun12 are the two partitions defined
by individual storage configs. Thus this should create 5 volumes labled
LIN-0001 and so on for linux boxes on Lun11 and recycle them right? Well
the jobs ran fine the first day and created those
What is the output of a List Volumes command?
Little background - Default Pool was set
up initially when I was just getting everything set up. Then I moved things
around to have a more structure. Default is not in use any more but the
catalog is still the same. The jobs for windows boxes
Well, right away it's apparent that there's no volumes in your Win-Pool
(therefore, no appendable volumes); all the volumes in your Lin-pool
are
used (all on the same day), but not recycled -- presumably they have
not
reached their retention date; and all the volumes in your Default
pool
Hello,
Aditya Ivaturi wrote:
I have 10 systems to be backed up evenly divided into linux and windows
boxes (5 5). I want to maintain two pools one for each type and have
separate volume for each job. So Pool-A will have vol-001, vol-002 and
so on for the 5 linux machines and similarly for
Hi,
theres no need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
the To-addresses. I admit that sometimes I forget to trim the addresses,
but usually you will never have to deal with that address...
Aditya Ivaturi wrote:
...
So if I am understanding it correctly, my config was default i.e 0
which means
Pool {
Name = Lin-pool
Pool Type = Backup
Recycle = yes # automatically
recycle Volumes
AutoPrune = yes # Prune expired
volumes
Volume Retention = 6 months
Accept Any Volume = yes # write on any volume in the pool
Maximum Volume Jobs = 1
Label Format = LIN-
Aditya Ivaturi wrote:
The Volume Use Duration directive defines the time period that the
Volume can be written beginning from the time of first data write to the
Volume. If the time-period specified is zero (the default), the Volume
can be written indefinitely. Otherwise, when the time period
Hi,
Aditya Ivaturi wrote:
...
I was actually thinking the same thing what you pointed out, but I
followed the example that was given in Using Pools to Manage Volume
http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/Using_Pools_Manage_Volumes.html. If you
see the example there, you'll notice that I did
Might be :-)
The examples given seem to be right - you have to consider when jobs
are
run to go to the pools in the example.
There will, for example, be a Diff pool for differentials. These are
run
once a week, and they expire after 40 days - and there is only one
job
in he
Hello,
Now am trying to plan my backup strategy. I have about 1TB data and in server i
have 5 harddrives (200Gb), now they are configured as RAID-stripe. But it is
not good, because if one of hard will die then i will loose all my backups, so
i want to configure these 5 drives as different
Hello,
viktorija wrote:
Hello,
Now am trying to plan my backup strategy. I have about 1TB data and in server i
have 5 harddrives (200Gb), now they are configured as RAID-stripe. But it is
not good, because if one of hard will die then i will loose all my backups, so
i want to configure
Dear List!
I try to to implement Bacula for a small company. I have succesfully
installed and configured bacula (congrats to all, who writed the
manual), but I need a little help, to develop the backup strategy.
I plan to do the backup to 200 MB IDE disks, and I think, that I have
enough space,
Hello,
Sza'sz Endre Istva'n wrote:
Dear List!
I try to to implement Bacula for a small company. I have succesfully
installed and configured bacula (congrats to all, who writed the
manual), but I need a little help, to develop the backup strategy.
I'll see if I can suggest something...
I
57 matches
Mail list logo