may i be forgiven both being woefully behind on my reading,
and sadly, finding disagreement with people on this list i respect.
to briefly recapitulate an issue from august:
there was discussion on the Primal Point, Who had Things to Do,
taking the time to deal with the issue of
In a message dated 10/30/2003 1:59:48 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
could it be as the beloved Guardian said (since he did in fact deal with the issue,
findable in lights of Guidance) that fantasy debilitates from intimacy (that's a paraphrase, one influenced
I think you
Has anyone else noticed the House's use of the word "race" in the April
2002 letter to the religious leaders of the world? Sometimes the word
is used for species, as if there is only one race in the world, yet
"races" are mentioned elsewhere:
Dear Tim,
What became of these people who took notes? Does anyone know?
I believe they all died.
David
_
Surf the net and talk on the phone with Xtra Jetstream @
http://www.xtra.co.nz/products/0,,5803,00.html !
--
You
If you accept the evidence for the Eve or the out of Africa theory,
science has already confirmed the origin of our present species 100,000
years ago.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 10,000 to 100,000 year mentioned by the Master seems to
indicate the beginning of human race around that time in
If you accept the evidence for the Eve or the out of Africa theory, science
has already confirmed the origin of our present species 100,000 years ago.
Dear Marlene,
I think even without the 'Eve' theory Homo Sapiens are supposed to emerge
about 100,000 years ago aren't they?
The Agricultral
