Did the Godfather quote scare you off? :)
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Roshan Mathews rmath...@gmail.com wrote:
I [shall carefully reply to] you because I had
[searched my mail and found] that you were a serious
man, to be treated with respect. But I must say no to
you and let me give you
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:23 PM, varunthac...@aol.in wrote:
I just heard about Google Go.My first reaction was of excitement.But when i
read about it i'm clueless as to what is it aiming for?
What do every feel about it?
Did you see the video [1] linked from that link? They say it's for
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Noufal Ibrahim nou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Mahadevan R mdevan.foo...@gmail.com
wrote:
[..]
By Robert Griesemer, Rob Pike, Ken Thompson, Ian Taylor, Russ Cox,
Jini Kim and Adam Langley - The Go Team
[..]
That caught my eye too
[snip]
Also this line is funny.
The company says that Go is experimental, and that it combines the
performance and security benefits associated with using a compiled language
like C++ with the speed of a dynamic language like Python
Heh, speed of Python and security of C++ ? I thought it
But I don't see the Python connection at all here.
Yeah! I jumped the line without reading. Actually going through now and
downloading the stuff I cant see much from Python perspective, that bloody
language is full of braces, but yes syntactically its more sugary and clean
I guess it might
On 11/11/2009 04:17 PM, Ramdas S wrote:
But I don't see the Python connection at all here.
Yeah! I jumped the line without reading. Actually going through now and
downloading the stuff I cant see much from Python perspective, that bloody
language is full of braces, but yes syntactically
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
abpil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Noufal Ibrahim nou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
abpil...@gmail.com wrote:
[..]
The company says that Go is
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Ramdas S ram...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
abpil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Noufal Ibrahim nou...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
Go combines the development speed of working in a dynamic language
like Python with the performance and safety of a compiled language
like C or C++.
It could just be the cynic in me, but this looks a lot like the
marketing MS did to sell VB.Net to VB devs. Vague phrases that aren't
precisely
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
abpil...@gmail.com wrote:
Upon 2nd reading, I also thought they did, but not a very good
disambiguation there I daresay. But security benefits associated to
a compiled language - I fall flat there since I don't see any
correlation
I found out yesterday that the application has to be developed on a proven
technology like Java,C++ or C#. When I spoke to the gentleman he said his
consultant said that dynamically typed languages are not safe for mission
critical work. The work is far from being mission-critical is another
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Darkseid lorddae...@gmail.com wrote:
I do hope you snidely pointed out to him that half of Google runs on Python?
:D
Which half? :)
http://groups.google.com/group/unladen-swallow/browse_thread/thread/4edbc406f544643e
--
Roshan Mathews
http://teamtalk.im
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
abpil...@gmail.com wrote:
The point is that so called compiled languages provide more security
loop-holes than interpreted ones. C++/C for example provide liberal
scope for buffer overflow exploits due to use of pointers and manual
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:18 AM, steve st...@lonetwin.net wrote:
On 11/11/2009 04:17 PM, Ramdas S wrote:
But I don't see the Python connection at all here.
Yeah! I jumped the line without reading. Actually going through now and
downloading the stuff I cant see much from Python
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Roshan Mathews rmath...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
abpil...@gmail.com wrote:
Upon 2nd reading, I also thought they did, but not a very good
disambiguation there I daresay. But security benefits associated to
That's what the big boys of the world wants you to believe. I had met a very
senior official in the government a techy himself and spent 3 hours showing
him virtues of Python and Django, hoping that they will change the RFP
terms.
I found out yesterday that the application has to be
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Darkseid lorddae...@gmail.com wrote:
I found out yesterday that the application has to be developed on a
proven
technology like Java,C++ or C#. When I spoke to the gentleman he said his
consultant said that dynamically typed languages are not safe for
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Roshan Mathews rmath...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
abpil...@gmail.com wrote:
The point is that so called compiled languages provide more security
loop-holes than interpreted ones. C++/C for example provide
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
abpil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Roshan Mathews rmath...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
abpil...@gmail.com wrote:
Upon 2nd reading, I also thought they did, but
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:23 PM, varunthac...@aol.in wrote:
I just heard about Google Go.My first reaction was of excitement.But when i
read about it i'm clueless as to what is it aiming for?
What do every feel about it?
this is the link to the blog post announcing Go.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Dhananjay Nene dhananjay.n...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:23 PM, varunthac...@aol.in wrote:
I just heard about Google Go.My first reaction was of excitement.But when
i read about it i'm clueless as to what is it aiming for?
What do every feel
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
abpil...@gmail.com wrote:
[..]
Upon 2nd reading, I also thought they did, but not a very good
disambiguation there I daresay. But security benefits associated to
a compiled language - I fall flat there since I don't see any
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Shashwat Anand
anand.shash...@gmail.com wrote:
Go - a son of C++ and python .. ??
to me it looked like verbose C .. first impression..not good. I mean it's
ok..but not to the level of Google. We expect better from mythical Google
engineers.
Well, more than
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
abpil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Roshan Mathews rmath...@gmail.com wrote:
The looks like Python, runs like C++ is more than just marketing
speak.
If you haven't noticed, Looks like Python, runs like C++ has
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Noufal Ibrahim nou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
abpil...@gmail.com wrote:
[..]
Upon 2nd reading, I also thought they did, but not a very good
disambiguation there I daresay. But security benefits
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Roshan Mathews rmath...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
abpil...@gmail.com wrote:
The point is that so called compiled languages provide more security
loop-holes than interpreted ones. C++/C for example provide
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Balachandran Sivakumar
benignb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Shashwat Anand
anand.shash...@gmail.com wrote:
Go - a son of C++ and python .. ??
to me it looked like verbose C .. first impression..not good. I mean it's
ok..but not to
Javascript is weakly
typed but you don't have buffer overflow problems there.
That's something I've never understood even though the all powerful
wikipedia says JS is weakly typed. Can someone give me an example to
illustrate the weak typing?
I would assume that people are arguing for strong
Harish,
I [shall carefully reply to] you because I had
[searched my mail and found] that you were a serious
man, to be treated with respect. But I must say no to
you and let me give you my reasons. It's true I have a
lot of friends in [software], but they wouldn't be so
friendly if they knew my
29 matches
Mail list logo
