On 12/14/07, Martin Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See lsusb-v-2.txt attached. It's now 0004. When I run bcharge I get
the following however,
The error isn't expected I don't think, but the mode has changed;
perhaps there is something different about your model of phone. So did
the phone
See lsusb-v-2.txt attached. It's now 0004. When I run bcharge I get
the following however,
The error isn't expected I don't think, but the mode has changed;
perhaps there is something different about your model of phone. So did
the phone start charging correctly?
You can try to run btool -l
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 12:30:59PM +, Miles Sabin wrote:
I have the udev rules installed (via the Fedora 7 RPM), but I still
have to manually run bcharge -o to get sensible results from btool -l
... without doing that first I get a timeout with the following
message,
[EMAIL
On 12/3/07, Martin Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, use the udev rules to run bcharge for you when you plug the
device in; with my blackberry pearl I don't have to run -o, just
bcharge will do.
I have the udev rules installed (via the Fedora 7 RPM), but I still
have to manually run bcharge
On Nov 30, 2007 10:32 PM, Chris Frey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Binary packages for the following distros are available:
Fedora 6 and 7
OpenSuSE 10.2
Debian stable (should work on Ubuntu as well)
I've made Barry 0.10 available to Gentoo users in the portage tree.
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 04:27:04PM -0500, Simon Ruggier wrote:
I think it would be slightly better to version a new release as 0.10.1
instead of 0.11, to reflect that this is a bugfix release.
For bugs like these, it would probably make more sense to have different
versions and binary releases
w00t w00t! testing now!
On 11/30/07, Chris Frey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Forgot to mention that there has been a change to the behaviour of
the Probe class in version 0.10 that affects backward compatibility.
There is no guarantee of backward compatibility during the devel stage
of
Eww, looks like ubuntu only has opensync 0.19 in the repos. That sucks :-(
On 11/30/07, Chris Frey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ho! Ho! Ho!
What better way to start December than with some yuletide Barry cheer?
I can't think of any, so pour a glass of eggnog and point those browsers
at the
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:11:20AM -0500, Zach Stern wrote:
Bad news, at least for me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ barrybackup
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
I'm out of devel juice for today, but it would help to get a backtrace.
Grab the dbg packages from sourceforge (they are in a separate
Hi,
Forgot to mention that there has been a change to the behaviour of
the Probe class in version 0.10 that affects backward compatibility.
There is no guarantee of backward compatibility during the devel stage
of Barry of course, but worth mentioning:
Before, when Probe would encounter
10 matches
Mail list logo
