On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 07:44:18PM -0700, troy engel wrote:
Chris, are you aware of any problems - other than more battery usage
on a laptop e.g. - with disabling USB suspend? A quick Google
I know of no such problems... actually the only problems I've had
are with leaving it on. :-)
Obviously
On 9/29/07, Chris Frey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It works great in my tests here. I'm letting it sit for a while to make
sure the kernel stays in on mode. So far so good.
Chris, are you aware of any problems - other than more battery usage
on a laptop e.g. - with disabling USB suspend? A quick
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 01:35:53AM -0400, Chris Frey wrote:
I'll update bcharge
soon to try to handle this automatically, but I'm not sure it will
work in every case.
Ok, CVS has been updated with a fix to bcharge.
If your system has the file level or autosuspend under
On 9/29/07, Chris Frey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know of no such problems... actually the only problems I've had
are with leaving it on. :-)
Heh. I was more thinking like with a USB mouse and so forth, but your
below comments clarified that we're only disabling it at runtime for
the single
Hi folks,
Well, I spent a chunk of tonight researching the practical ways of
controlling CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND, or as we'll call it below: autosuspend.
Here are the results:
Kernels:
Version 2.6.21 behaves with autosuspend=0 meaning off, while 2.6.22
and higher needs autosuspend=-1 to
