Re: [base] update issue from 2.14.0 to 2.16.1

2010-11-24 Thread philipp-1 . kaiser
Oh, silly me. Thanks for pointing at the right direction. Obviously I forgot to set the right environment for the update procedure. For Solaris it's necessary to have this old java version for some os components, otherwise I would have updated the java completely. Thank you for BASE

Re: [base] update issue from 2.14.0 to 2.16.1

2010-11-24 Thread Olivier Lefevre
I guess we really should change the compilation to use '-target 1.6' Or simply omit it. In general I can think of few scenarios where you'd want to target an older VM than the one you are working with (one reason might be compiler fixes that were not back-ported): that invites the sort of

Re: [base] update issue from 2.14.0 to 2.16.1

2010-11-24 Thread Nicklas Nordborg
On 2010-11-24 15:10, Olivier Lefevre wrote: I guess we really should change the compilation to use '-target 1.6' Or simply omit it. In general I can think of few scenarios where you'd want to target an older VM than the one you are working with (one reason might be compiler fixes that were

[base] update issue from 2.14.0 to 2.16.1

2010-11-23 Thread philipp-1 . kaiser
Dear team, I got a weird error during updating my base2 installation from 2.14.0 to 2.16.1. Tomcat is shut down, I run sh updatedb.sh password. See the output below. Any advise or idea whats going on? Thanks in advance, /philipp [0%]--System information- BASE

Re: [base] update issue from 2.14.0 to 2.16.1

2010-11-23 Thread Olivier Lefevre
Java     : Java(TM) Platform, Standard Edition for Business; 1.5.0_16-b02; Sun Microsystems Inc. java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.util.Arrays.copyOf([Ljava/lang/Object;I)[Ljava/lang/Object; You're running Java 1.5 but the Array.copyOf methods were introduced in Java 1.6:

Re: [base] update issue from 2.14.0 to 2.16.1

2010-11-23 Thread Olivier Lefevre
That line of code (IntensityFormula.java:91) was changed in 2.16 so it is not so strange. I meant I was surprised that this 1.5 VM didn't immediately reject classes obviously compiled against 1.6. Did you use the -target 1.5 option in compilation? -- O.L.

Re: [base] update issue from 2.14.0 to 2.16.1

2010-11-23 Thread Nicklas Nordborg
On 2010-11-23 21:22, Olivier Lefevre wrote: That line of code (IntensityFormula.java:91) was changed in 2.16 so it is not so strange. I meant I was surprised that this 1.5 VM didn't immediately reject classes obviously compiled against 1.6. Did you use the -target 1.5 option in compilation?