Re: [base] Offline files

Nicklas Nordborg writes: Giovanni Coppola wrote: Hi everybody, I have two questions: 1) is there a way to download images or raw data files in batches? No. yes but there is a zip file unpacker (in BASE 2) I haven't used it, but doesn't this cut down on the GUI clicking if you

Re: [base] Offline files

The zip up-loader is meant to be used for uploading bulks of files, and is working well. For retrieving files from the server there is no batch support. Jari Bob MacCallum wrote: Nicklas Nordborg writes: Giovanni Coppola wrote: Hi everybody, I have two questions: 1) is

Re: [base] Offline files

What does mean to move offline ? Is it the same as: Delete THEN Empty trash ? -- Emmanuel COURCELLE[EMAIL PROTECTED] L.I.P.M. (UMR CNRS-INRA 2594/441) tel (33) 5-61-28-54-50 B.P.52627 - 31326 CASTANET TOLOSAN Cedex - FRANCE --

[base] submission to arrayExpress...

Hi, With MAGE-ML export for ArrayExpress in mind, when will BASE 1.2.18 be available? Best regards, Mark ** Dr Mark Alston, Computational Biologist, Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Colney, Norwich NR4 7UA, UK. Tel +44 (0)1603

Re: [base] Offline files

Emmanuel Courcelle wrote: What does mean to move offline ? Is it the same as: Delete THEN Empty trash ? No it is not. A file exists in two places. As an entry in the database and as a file on the disk. The Move offline feature is used when you want to delete the file on disk but keep the

Re: [base] Offline files

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:basedb-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob MacCallum Sent: 29 November 2006 10:15 To: BASE ML Subject: Re: [base] Offline files [...] At some point, someone will come up with a bulk loader which will batch/bulk/mass upload

Re: [base] Offline files

Hi Micha, i would love to see how you accomplished this. after having put in over 100 RawBioAssays plus affiliated biosources, samples, extracts, labeled extracts, hybridizations, and scans by hand.. i am strongly motivated to program an automated solution. -keith Micha Bayer wrote:

Re: [base] Offline files

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Micha Bayer Hi Micha, I have just finished writing one. The user uploads a zip file, a new directory is created in the user's raw data directory (with the same name as the zip file) and the files are

Re: [base] Offline files

Hi all, Just a thought, I think the best choice to trigger a large import like this is to create a plug-in instead of adding extra tabs to the file browser. The plug-in should start by requesting the zip file/directory to import. If the zip file is not already uploaded the user will have an

Re: [base] Offline files

Hello everybody, thank you for you replies. I'll transform my questions in suggestions: 1) data batch downloading would be great, since this is a pretty basic task, many experiments have 30+ arrays, and right now the user needs two clicks for each. 2) it is extremely misleading, to have a

Re: [base] Offline files

Hi Jari, That sounds perfectly reasonable when you put it like this, but I was put off going down that route by a post to the list from Nicklas (http://www.mail-archive.com/basedb-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00228.html) where he says that it is best to not use a plugin to do this because of

Re: [base] Offline files

Jari Häkkinen wrote: Hi all, Just a thought, I think the best choice to trigger a large import like this is to create a plug-in instead of adding extra tabs to the file browser. The plug-in should start by requesting the zip file/directory to import. If the zip file is not already

Re: [base] Offline files

Ah, even better ;-) Nicklas Nordborg wrote: Jari Häkkinen wrote: Hi all, Just a thought, I think the best choice to trigger a large import like this is to create a plug-in instead of adding extra tabs to the file browser. The plug-in should start by requesting the zip file/directory to

Re: [base] Offline files

Micha Bayer wrote: I am just talking to my boss about code ownership issues but I can probably offer up my stuff one way or another, and people can then either cannibalise it and turn it into a plugin, or adopt it (or a modified version) into the core etc etc -- happy with any solution

Re: [base] Offline files

Micha Bayer wrote: Hi Jari, That sounds perfectly reasonable when you put it like this, but I was put off going down that route by a post to the list from Nicklas http://www.mail-archive.com/basedb-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00228.html) where he says that it is best to not use a

Re: [base] Offline files

Micha Bayer wrote: Hi Jari, That sounds perfectly reasonable when you put it like this, but I was put off going down that route by a post to the list from Nicklas (http://www.mail-archive.com/basedb-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00228.html) where he says that it is best to not use a

Re: [base] Offline files

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:basedb-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicklas Nordborg Sent: 29 November 2006 14:40 To: BASE ML Subject: Re: [base] Offline files Jari Häkkinen wrote: Hi all, Just a thought, I think the best choice to trigger a

Re: [base] Offline files

It looks like I let the cat out of the bag on this one... Some discussion among the community would be good to establish what we want from a bulk loader. For example, I would like all objects created and linked, from samples (with annotations) right up to raw bioassays (grouped into an

Re: [base] Offline files

I think a bulk importer is essential. We have found that all users enter data in bulk. They set aside some time to enter a set of data, usually from the same experiment. Having the user enter each chip individually leads to user frustration and clerical errors. We created a bulk uploader which