her way will
> do.
>
> Martín.
>
> --
> From: ferrari_mar...@hotmail.com
> To: mansi.sh...@gmail.com; basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 16:35:33 +
> Subject: Re: [basex-talk] Finding document based on filenam
(), but it
seems it does not pick up indexes.
Martín.
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:52:37 -0400
From: mansi.sh...@gmail.com
To: basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
Subject: [basex-talk] Finding document based on filename
Hello,
I would be having 100s of databases, with each database having 100 XML
documents. I
;
>
>Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:52:37 -0400
>From: mansi.sh...@gmail.com
>To: basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
>Subject: [basex-talk] Finding document based on filename
>
>Hello,
>I would be having 100s of databases, with each dat
Oh, I've also tried using starts-with() instead of contains(),
> but it seems it does not pick up indexes.
>
> Martín.
>
>
> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:52:37 -0400
> From: mansi.sh...@gmail.com
> To: basex-
; basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 16:35:33 +
Subject: Re: [basex-talk] Finding document based on filename
Hi Mansi, I have a similar situation. I don't think there's a fast way to
get documents by only knowing a part of their names. It seems you need to know
Hello,
I would be having 100s of databases, with each database having 100 XML
documents. I want to devise an algorithm, where given a part of XML file
name, i want to know which database(s) contains it, or null if document is
not currently present in any database. Based on that, add current
6 matches
Mail list logo
